Airlines Not Being Entirely Honest About Delays & Cancellations
Yesterday Chris Elliott, a noted consumer advocate and travel blogger … who you should all be reading … wrote a blog post entitled ‘Are airlines bending the truth about weather delays?’, which got me thinking about all my delayed and canceled flights.
I’m not going to go into the rules surrounding passenger compensation, or lack there of, for delays and cancellations and the implications of airlines changing the official reason for these events, as suggested, you should read Chris’ post ‘Are airlines bending the truth about weather delays?’, for that.
What I am going into are two instances Chris’ post reminded me of where airlines blamed a flight delay and flight cancellation on weather when in reality it was apparent weather was not involved. Both situations left me frustrated at the time, but now looking back I find myself laughing over the absurdity of airlines blaming the situations on weather
The cancellation instance involved a United Express Flight, operated by SkyWest, flying from San Francisco to Sacramento. The flight kept being delayed when the gate agent announced the flight was cancelled due to weather. After a few moments I found out the inbound aircraft was arriving from Santa Barbara and that the aircraft was on the ground at the airport there. Another quick check of the weather between Santa Barbara and San Francisco for the previous day and the weather for the coming 12 hours, showed clear skies, no turbulence and unlimited visibility. When I presented this information to the Gate Agent and asked how the cancellation was weather related they excused themselves and called the police saying I was looking and ‘sensitive information.’ The police came, I showed them the info I had from public online sites for tracking aircraft and the weather available publicly from NOAA’s National Weather Service. The officers apologized for the inconvenience and left.
This left me really annoyed with the SkyWest gate agent. I started to call United’s corporate communications folks to ask them to comment on being blatantly lied to by United Express staff, in front of the staff, and what a surprise I was magically placed on another flight to Sacramento leaving a few moments later and handed a voucher for a free round trip flight.
If the gate agents were going to claim “weather” they should have spent 30 seconds to find out if that reason was plausible. Why the aircraft never made it to San Francisco I have no idea.
The second situation, which really makes me laugh, goes back to the days of Northwest Airlines. While waiting for a flight from New York’s JFK to San Francisco, via Minneapolis, I was seated facing a window overlooking the Boeing 757 at our departure gate, when two mechanics showed up, popped open the starboard side engine cowling and began working on the engine. The mechanics began replacing hoses, and inspecting the engine with flashlights. As the mechanics worked on the engine, in plain view of everyone waiting to board the flight, the gate agent keyed up the microphone for the public address system and announced that our flight was going to be significantly delayed due to weather.
Airlines can blame many things on weather, even when weather is not involved, and reasonably expect to get away with that excuse … however … when two mechanics have an engine cowling open and are replacing parts of the engine in full view of all the passengers waiting to board the flight, it is just brazen for an airline gate agent to try and blame the delay on weather. Mechanics worked on the engine, at the gate, for roughly three hours. We boarded the flight around thirty minutes after the mechanics closed up the engine and disappeared from view.
I am sure some of you have some funny, or at least frustrating, stories of airlines being less that transparent (lying right to your face) with delays and cancellations. I’d love to hear your stories.
Happy Flying!
What did the United Website say was the reason for the delay?
Kerwin, When this happened in late 2007 … nothing .
Happy Flying
-Fish
When airlines claim “weather,” it protects them against compensating passengers as it is an act of God. Another in the fine customer service model of US airlines.
If you ask anyone you know who has worked a counter at an airport for airline, they will tell you airlines lie about weather all of the time. This has been happening for decades.
I suspect some of the statements about weather started out, at least, as a white lie. Some passengers don’t like hearing that the plane they are about to fly on has broken down, so a white lie about weather is fairly harmless and doesn’t concern anyone. The problem only comes when they can wriggle out of compensation by lying about the reasons for a delay. But then that’s fraud and should be imprisonable.
More likely is that the information the agent was reading from the system (as input by airline operations) said the delay was due to weather. I have seen airlines use a weather delay in reference to weather that occured in one or two stations upline from my location, but it is unlikely that the carrier would want to leave the aircraft off the planned routing for the day or that gate agents would blatantly lie to passengers about the reason for a delay.
This happened to me 2 years ago from LHR to DFW. We were late because of the delay leaving LHR and we missed the connection going to DFW from ORD; therefore, we had to stay at a hotel overnight. AA would not compensate us for the hotel, because they said the delay out of LHR was ‘weather’ related. It wasn’t weather related at all.
I think this happened to me the other day. It’s a tough call because there was a blizzard coming but our flight was scheduled to leave ahead of the weather. At first I heard an agent tell someone that the plane was getting de-iced (it was a sunny 50 degrees outside) then as the delayed continued for another hour or so we missed our window with the weather and our flight was canceled. Tough call but I can’t help but feel if we had left on time we weather would not have been an issue.
Sometimes, there is weather from an inbound aircraft or crew, or other less-obvious reasons. However, as you say, sometimes it is a lie. I wish a lot of this stuff was more transparent to the passengers as it does affect compensation and rebooking. The DOT/FAA regulates so much, but in this critical experience area, there is little recourse for consumers to get information or dispute the blatantly false statements of employees. Airline employees sadly hide behind the “security” line far too often, and have no consequences for crying wolf.
Basically, we should just remove the act of God clause in its entirety.
Airlines (and insurance companies, etc.) rather than individuals should be compelled to take the risk that their profit margins may collapse because of the weather.
Basically when it comes to corporations versus individuals, good and fair legislation should always, without exception, be in favour of the individual.
We had a Delta connection from MSP to home. We arrived at the gate 10 minutes before departure(plane from LAS was 45 min. late). The plane had already been pushed back from the gate. We had friends that had taken a bump from a earlier flight and were on standby for this flight. They texted us from the plane thanking us for our seats. They new which seats we had on this flight. We asked the agent why the plane was leaving 10 min. early and she just said they were ready? So much for running from one flight to another.
I just wanted to point out in SFO all of the customer service reps are United employees, not SkyWest. SkyWest lost the contract to handle above wing about two years ago. They only handle the ramp functions now.
Chris,
This was in 2007 (maybe 2008?). The gate staff was SkyWest not United at the time.
Happy Flying!
-Fish
Is this the same Chris Elliott who sold the ‘New York Times’ that story about standup seating?