break
Jul 2

Here’s a pdf link to the interim report on the crash of Air France Flight 447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris that killed 228 when it crashed into the Atlantic Ocean on June 1.

From day one, because of personal history, I have had serious questions about why that airplane was “missing” for so long after it last had contact with Brazilian air traffic control — shortly before the time we now know that it crashed. In fact, the plane was “missing” for almost seven hours after its last communication with Brazilian air traffic control.

Whatever catastrophic equipment failures, combined with severe weather, caused that crash, the loss of contact with that airplane is one of the key ancillary questions — and by all indications the French are determined to dig out the facts on this.

What was the precise role of air traffic control in both Brazil and Senegal, which was the next center to have control? Who knew what and when? Why did it take so long? Where were mistakes made, and who made them? Why was the flight plan not transferred from Brazil to Senegal — or was it transferred and not received? Did a rescue and recovery operation get underway hours later than it should have because of those mistakes?

In that context, I refer anyone who is very interested in these questions to the following pages in the interim report by the French Bureau d’Enquetes et d’Analyses (BEA), that nation’s equivalent of our National Transportation Safety Board. The BEA stresses that this is an initial report.

–Page 45: “1.16.2.1: ATC Messages”

–Page 56-57: “1.17.1.3: Preparation of Flight AF447 on 31 May 2009″

–Page 61: “1.17.4.1: Letters of agreement between the DAKAR [Senegal] and ATLANTICO [Brazil] control centers.

–Page 68: “2: Initiial Findings” … “The flight was not transferred between the Brazilian and Senegalese control centers.”

Something about a miscommunication over the flight plan.

I wonder where I have heard that before.

Anyway, here’s a key passage from the Wall Street Journal update on this report today:

“BEA officials said they were also looking into why the plane was only reported missing almost seven hours after its last radio contact. Another five hours passed before Brazilian authorities launched a search and rescue mission.

Mr. Bouillard [Alain Bouillard, the BEA official leading the investigation] said that when the plane passed from a Brazilian air-traffic control region to a Senegalese zone at 2:20 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time, controllers in Dakar, Senegal, should have contacted Brazil’s Atlantic center to confirm the hand-off. But the Dakar center never received the plane’s flight path [reference is to the flight plan], as it should have, and never confirmed it was tracking the jetliner. The Brazilian center didn’t contact Dakar to check why controllers hadn’t been in contact, Mr. Bouillard said — a lapse that the BEA plans to investigate further.”

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jul 2

After a month of speculation and kibitzing by the civil authorities and the media, we still have very few answers on why Air France Flight 447 crashed in the ocean en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris on June 1, not longer after leaving Brazilian air space.

Here’s an update based on new information from the French air-accident report agency.

From that update via Reuters, here is a section that caught my attention:

“‘The plane was not destroyed while it was in flight. It seems to have hit the surface of the water in the direction of flight and with a strong vertical acceleration,’” said Alain Bouillard, who is leading the investigation on behalf of France’s BEA air accident board.

“Bouillard said control of the flight was supposed to have passed from air traffic controllers in Brazil to their counterparts in Senegal, but that never happened.

He said the pilots of flight AF 447 had tried three times to connect to a data system in the Senegalese capital Dakar, but had failed, apparently because Dakar had never received the flight plan.

“This is not normal,” he said, adding that investigators were also trying to find out why it took six hours after the plane disappeared before an emergency was declared.

[UPDATE: Meanwhile, from the story now running on the New York Times Web site:

"Mr. Brouillard said there had been a “dysfunction” in communication between air traffic controllers in Brazil and Senegal in coordinating the handling of the flight. The report released Thursday makes clear that controllers were slow to realize the plane had been lost. Two hours and 45 minutes after Flight 447 sent its last automated message describing problems on board, controllers were still asking the crew of a different Air France flight to try and contact Flight 447 on their radios."]

Again, I ask: Who? What? When? Where? Why?

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jul 2

Just as the July 4 holiday weekend looms, United Airlines passengers are jammed up at Chicago O’Hare by a computer glitch, source unknown.

[UPDATE: Here's a way better story from the Chicago Tribune Web site.]

The problem is affecting departing United mainline and regional-partner flights. By mid-morning, United mainline flights were departing a mere 15 percent on time, and United Express regional carrier partners were dragging along at about the same rate, according to data from Flightstats.com, which will update throughout the day.

Let’s hope this isn’t a sign of months to come for air travelers.

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jul 1

Hey, psychotics and other crazy people read the papers and get on airplanes too.

So do you think this loon might have read this story?

Just askin’.

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jul 1

The first strategies a young business traveler learns are the ones for avoiding that dread middle seat, at least to the extent possible. There are those of us who have flown an unnecessary several thousand miles or so at the end of the year just to ensure that we re-qualfy for the elite status that gives us the best shot at priority seat choice — that is, avoiding the middle seat.

So here’s an interesting survey today from 3M Privacy Filters, which makes among other things products to protect your laptop-screen privacy from prying eyes in the next seat. (Which of course adds up to two next seats if you’re stuck in the middle).

“… according to a survey commissioned in April 2009 by 3M Privacy Filters, only 1 percent of those polled actually prefer to sit in the middle seat and 80 percent say they go out of their way to avoid it on a full flight. But, what is it about the middle seat that bothers people the most? Is it the cramped quarters? Lack of privacy? Rude seatmates? These survey findings reveal travelers’ true feelings and some insights about the middle seat “experience.”

—A majority of Americans would rather get stuck in traffic (56 percent), go on a blind date (56 percent) or go to the dentist (54 percent) than sit in the middle seat on a full flight.

—People dislike the middle seat so much they go to great lengths to avoid it altogether. Fifty percent of people said they would be likely to take an aisle seat being offered on the next available flight, while one in five Americans (20 percent) say they would actually stay overnight at an airport hotel for an aisle seat on the first flight the next morning!

—Nine percent of Americans report that they would refuse to sit in the middle seat on a full flight if it was more than 1-2 hours.

Top Five Middle Seat Annoyances

1. Having a nosy seatmate peering over your shoulder (84 percent)

2. Crawling over someone to get to the bathroom (83 percent)

3. Not being able to stretch out (83 percent)

4. Having an overweight seatmate on either side of you (80 percent)

5. Not having a place to rest your head (71 percent)

* Despite all the annoyances that come with sitting in the middle seat, nearly nine in 10 Americans are concerned with being a “good” middle seat occupant. After all, who wants to be rude?

Middle Seat Etiquette

—When sitting in the middle seat, you are subject to bad etiquette from neighbors on both sides. With in-flight wi-fi available on many flights, 65 percent of people are concerned about nosy neighbors snooping on personal or work emails and with good reason, since 49 percent of people admit to glancing at strangers’ computer screens.

—However, there seem to be some discrepancies about proper etiquette. While 6 percent of people believe both armrests belong to the person sitting in the middle seat, the rest either had no idea of the proper etiquette (51 percent), believe one armrest belongs to the person in the middle (22 percent) or believe half of each armrest belongs to the person in the middle (21 percent).

—Nearly two-thirds of Americans (63 percent) agree that there is absolutely nothing good about sitting in the middle seat on a full airplane flight. However, some travelers do try to see the silver lining. An optimistic 17 percent say sitting in the middle seat means you do not get hit by the drink cart and 15 percent suggest that sitting in the middle gives you a chance to meet and talk to interesting people.”

***

Myself, I’ll take being whacked by the drink cart any day over being wedged in a middle seat.

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jun 30

From the “You cannot make this stuff up” news and travel beat, South Carolina Gov. Sanford now says he has had liaisons with other women besides the Argentine chickie-chickie he was “visiting” when he said he was hiking the Appalachian trail. (Which assertion, of course, gave new and enduring meaning to the phrase “hiking the Appalachian trail.”)

(And while we’re on the subject, can someone please not ruin the phrase “Crossing the Khyber Pass?”)

Anyway, in this AP account via the WSJ Online today, Sanford says that he had other, uh, relationships with women other than Mrs. Sanford in which he, uh “crossed lines.” But he hastened to add that he “never crossed the ultimate line” with anyone but Maria Belen Chapur, the Argentine woman. Of her, he said, “This was a whole lot more than a simple affair, this was a love story. A forbidden one, a tragic one, but a love story at the end of the day.”

Be still my busting gut! And could someone please explain to me what the hell crossing the “ultimate line” means? That? Or that? Or what? No, not that?? Egad!

[Update] — Wait, it gets weirder. The following bizarre quote comes from a longer version of the AP story than the WSJ one linked to above. The AP had a lengthy interview with the crazy Carolina chatterbox. The governor seems to admit that among his transgressions was dirty dancing. Also he did stupid, although maybe Stupid is someone’s name, as in those tee-shirts that say “I’m With Stupid.”

Said Sanford:

“What I would say is that I’ve never had sex with another woman. Have I done stupid? I have. You know you meet someone. You dance with them. You go to a place where you probably shouldn’t have gone,” Sanford said, declining to discuss details.”

This poor man evidently can’t help himself as he writes his bodice-rippper novel out loud. Listen, Sanford: Stop that dancing! Stop talking! Instead, type! There’s a market for this kind of prose.

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jun 30

Alaska Airlines and JetBlue ranked highest, in the network carrier and low-cost carrier segments respectively, in the annual airline customer-satisfaction survey by J.D. Power and Associates.

Following Alaska in the network rankings were Continental and Delta. Following JetBlue in the low-cost segment rankings were Southwest and WestJet.

On the other hand, the report found that “overall customer satisfaction with airlines in 2009 has declined for a third consecutive year … The decline is driven by decreased customer satisfaction with in-flight services, flight crew, and costs and fees, compared with 2008.”

Uh, wait a minute here. I do think I see a discrepancy. “Decreased customer satisfaction” with “costs?” Wot? Air fares this year have generally been at their lowest levels in memory, as airlines struggle to fill seats and gin up revenue any way they can. Airlines have not been able to cut capacity fast enough to keep pace with the plunge in demand.

Just goes to show you that these “surveys,” while generally useful in an anecdotal way, reflect the fact that some of the respondents don’t know what they’re talking about.

Some airline customers, it seems to me, persist in the absurd belief that they’re being shaken down every time they board a plane for that $180 round-trip flight between, say, Boston and Orlando. There’s a segment of the market, long conditioned by a variety of airline “consumer” writers, that basically believes they should fly somewhere close to free.

I pound on the airlines fairly regularly, but economics are very plain.

This is an industry in dire financial shape, and some deluded passengers are in for a very rude awakening once the surviving carriers manage to cut capacity even more — and raise fares to the point where they can make a profit.

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jun 30

The USA Today newspaper has achieved a degree of status today. It appears to be an Onion parody of itself in its coverage of the crash in the Indian Ocean of an Airbus A310 Yemeni airliner that killed more than 150.

USA Today’s online headline:

“Jet Crashes; 5-Year-Old Rescued”

Always look on the bright side of life. Ta-da-ta-da.

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jun 28
As competitors rush to install AirCell’s GoGo WiFi connections on their domestic fleets, Continental Airlines has been very coy about any plans to improve lagging cabin in-flight entertainment and/or connectivity on its domestic aircraft.

However, Continental says it plans to install DIRECTV seatback satellite TV systems on its newer 737s and on its 757-300s. Here’s the quiet Continental announcement.

So far, Continental has outfitted 10 of 23 737-900 ERs and expects to have all of those models completed by September. Its 108 737-800s will be done by August 2010, with other 737s and its 17 757-300s to follow (by January 2011).

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post
Jun 27

From the NTSB Web site, without comment:

“The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating two recent incidents in which airspeed and altitude indications in the cockpits of Airbus A-330 aircraft may have malfunctioned.

The first incident occurred May 21, 2009, when TAM Airlines flight 8091 (Brazilian registration PT-MVB) flying from Miami, Florida to Sao Paulo, Brazil, experienced a loss of primary speed and altitude information while in cruise flight. Initial reports indicate that the flight crew noted an abrupt drop in indicated outside air temperature, followed by the loss of the Air Data Reference System and disconnections of the autopilot and auto-thrust, along with the loss of speed and altitude information. The flight crew used backup instruments and primary data was restored in about 5 minutes. The flight landed at Sao Paulo with no further incident and there were no injuries and damage.

The Safety Board has become aware of another possibly similar incident that occurred on June 23 on a Northwest Airlines A-330 (registration unknown) flying between Hong Kong and Tokyo. The aircraft landed safely in Tokyo; no injuries or damage was reported. Data recorder information, Aircraft Condition Monitoring System messages, crew statements and weather information are being collected by NTSB investigators.”

###

Bookmark and Share
Print This Post Print This Post

« Previous Entries