break
May 13

As has been apparent almost since day one, pilot error caused the Feb. 12 crash near Buffalo of a Continental Airlines flight operated by Colgan Air, in which 50 people died. Hearings this week by the National Transportation Safety Board are making that even more clear.

But there are other basic and extremely troublesome issues, long known in the industry and now being threaded out more fully at the ongoing N.T.S.B. hearings. Those industry-wide issues are chronic pilot fatigue, low pilot pay, inadequate pilot training and poor resume-checking by some regional airlines, all of which are under terrific cost-cutting pressure from the major airlines who use the regionals as subcontractors.

At today’s hearing (which was Webcast by the N.T.S.B.), Colgan Air executives were asked about many of those issues. Their answers are enlightening, to the extent that one can drill down through the palaver.

The basic ugly truth — long known by regional airline pilots and by those of us who follow these things — is that many regional airline pilots work in a culture of chronic fatigue, in a sub-tier of the air-travel industry where captains might make $50,000 a year and first officers might make less than $20,000, and that the official FAA-sanctioned duty-time regulations that supposedly ensure that pilots have enough time to sleep (7 hours, which of course includes the time to get from airport to hotel and back) are a national scandal.

The feckless FAA — which incidentally has been operating without a director for almost two years — is complicit in the grim fiction that safety standards are just fine, evidence aside. The N.T.S.B., to its credit, is digging out the ugly reality, case by case, question by question.

Colgan, a subsidiary of Pinnacle Airlines, supplies regional-airline service to Continental and other airlines. The flight that crashed on approach to Buffalo was Continental Flight 3407 from Newark, operated by Colgan on a 70-seat Dash 8- Q400 commuter turboprop with 49 aboard. (One of the fatalities was in the house the plane crashed into near the airport.}

In the cockpit were Captain Marvin D. Renslow, 47, and First Officer Rebecca Shaw, 24. Renslow had scant experience in the Dash 8; Shaw had more, but had been on the job for only a little over a year. Shaw’s base salary was about $16,000 a year (it could have gone up to around $24,000 with overtime), and Renslow was making around $60,00.

It is n0w known that the plane crashed, in icy, blustery weather, when the captain pulled back on the yoke, rather than pushing it forward, to make a crucial correction, a mistake that sent the plane into a fatal stall. It’s also now known that Renslow and Shaw were engaged in idle job and career-related chatter at the time of the accident, a violation of rules that ban chit-chat in the cockpit during takeoff and landing procedures, below 10,000 feet.

The pilots, the 47 passengers and the victim on the ground paid for those mistakes with their lives.

But what about the underlying culture? What about the problems of operating airlines with badly paid, sometimes inadequately trained pilots who are so overworked that they catch sleep in empty jump seats or crawl up to grab a few hours sleep on a couch or chair in airport crew-lounges? (I’ve even heard from regional pilots who said they know colleagues who have crawled into a row of coach seats on a parked regional airliner at an airport to snatch a few hours of sleep).

At today’s hearings, Colgan officials maintained that the fault lay with the two dead pilots. Period.

Rather than characterize or paraphrase their testimony, I’ll give you some direct-quote examples from this morning’s hearing.

The Colgan executives giving testimony were Harry Mitchel, Colgan’s vice president for flight operations, and Mary Finnigan, the vice president of administration (meaning, she’s the human-resources lady.)

Colgan, incidentally, has in recent years closed about 10 of its regional crew bases, which now number 20 at locations around the country, with the result that many pilots are now commuting (via free hops on airplanes) long distances to reach the airport where they the clock then starts ticking for their official workday. Also, the word “commuting” describes pilots who need to get to one airport to start a new shift from the airport where their previous flight ended. Shaw was based in Newark but had recently moved back to her native Washington state to save money by living with her parents — necessitating the transcontinental commute to work.

***

N.T.S.B member Debbie Hersman asked the two Colgan executives what the average salary was for a captain and a first officer.

Colgan’s Finnigan said, “It really depends on how many hours they fly.”

HERSMAN: “OK, but it sounded like in this case for the first officer [the 24-year-old Rebecca Shaw] it was in the $16,000 range. Is that accurate?”

FINNIGAN: “That would be accurate.”

Later:

HERSMAN: “How many Colgan pilots have second jobs?”

FINNIGAN: “I don’t know.”

H: “Does Colgan have a policy against pilots having second jobs?”

F: “Our policy states that we discourage anyone in the company having a second job; however if for a pilot, if they do, or a flight attendant, it can’t be in the aviation field that would affect their time and duty.”

H: “Were you aware that the first officer worked in a coffee shop when she was in Norfolk?” [Before transferring to the Newark crew base, Shaw had been assigned to the Colgan base in Norfolk.]

F: “No, m’am. I was not.”

H: “Do you have any concerns about people working second jobs?”

F: “I believe that our policy says that they need to give their full-time attention to their duties and responsibilities with Colgan Air, so i really can’t speculate because i don’t know the kind of hours she worked, or any of the details.”

After some questioning about deficiencies in Captain Renslow’s training record and his somewhat spotty resume, Hersman wanted to know what financial and other options Colgan pilots might have when, for example, their crew base was closed and they had to relocate to another, more expensive, area of the country — for example, the Newark-New York area. She pressed Mitchel, Colgan’s flight operations chief, on that.

HERSMAN: “Do you have a locality pay, somewhat like the federal government, where if there’s a higher [cost] of living in certain areas, if they’re based in a high-cost- of-living area, they might get a higher pay rate or a bonus or an incentive?”

MITCHEL: “On the pilot side it’s a straight across-the-board hourly [pay, irrespective of base location]. For management personnel, yes, we look at that equation.”

H: “Do you know kind of what the cost of living in the Newark area is — is it considered high?”

M: “It’s on the high scale.”

H: “And on $16,000 to $20,000, what would that afford you in Newark?”

M: “I’m not sure about that, m’am, but I do know that Colgan Air provides a fantastic opportunity for our crew members. We have plenty of crew members that have come through Colgan Air to the major airlines, so we look at it as a stepping-stone in a career path. Our pilots generally appreciate the opportunity to fly for Colgan Air…”

H: “Mr. Mitchel, when you talked about a 16-hour duty day, were you familiar with the first officer’s schedule the day before the accident?”

M: “Yes, m’am, I am aware.”

H: “So she began the day by waking at 9 or 10 in the morning; she started her commute from Seattle that evening; she commuted from Seattle to Memphis, stayed in a crew lounge in Memphis from midnight to 4 a.m., commuted from Memphis to Newark from 4 to 6.30, and then hung out in a crew lounge in Newark until her 1.30 show-time. The accident occurred that evening. That looks like about a 36-hour clock to me. I think at best maybe there was an opportunity — I’m not sure if she could get it — but there might have been the opportunity for 7 hours’ sleep during that commute. But it sounds pretty horrible to me. It’s not something I would want, to try to achieve my sleep on those legs from Seattle to Memphis, in a crew lounge in Memphis, and then from Memphis to Newark. Do you think this violates kind of the spirit of duty time?”

[My note: The reply from Mitchel is a true gem. Here is where Mitchel slurs the dead pilots for their lack of "professionalism," rather than acknowledging that the system might be flawed. His syntax is a bit difficult to follow, but the drift is clear]:

MITCHEL: “I think it violates the professionalism of a crew member. We can’t dictate to a crew member what they do on their own time. We hire professionals, and those professionals we expect should show up fresh and ready to fly that aircraft, and we provide the adequate rest for those individuals. There is no difference: If my wife has a baby and I’m up all night with my new-born and I get no sleep — same situation. If I am fatigued, I shouldn’t fly that airplane.”

HERSMAN: “Your commuting policy says crew members shouldn’t commute on the day that their shift begins, but she [First Officer Shaw] began the commute on the day before her shift began, but she finished her commute on the day the shift began. How do you monitor this policy and how is it enforced?”

M: “Again, it not a firm hard policy. It’s guidelines to our crew member. … We just give those pilots the guidelines to try to make an appropriate professional decision, and giving those guidelines to our pilots is our responsibility. How that individual or those individuals execute their duties and responsibilities on their own time is up to those individuals.”

Later, another N.T.S.B. member, Kitty Higgins, zeroed in on the extraordinary percentage of Colgan pilots based at Newark who live far away, and thus need to fly to Newark [hopping free crew-rides on whichever flight they can] to start any new “duty time.”

HIGGINS: “A hundred thirty-seven Newark-based pilots are commuting, and if I did the math correctly, 20 percent of those pilots live more than 1,000 miles from the Newark base, and another 14 percent live 400 or more miles. So that’s more than a third of the pilots based in Newark … commuting extensive distances. … How do you define duty time?”

MITCHEL: “Duty time is specifically outlined in the FAA regulations.”

H: “And what does it say?”

M: “Unless it’s in front of me, I do not have it memorized.”

H: “Does duty time include commuting time?”

M: “No, m’am.”

H: “So the fact that the first officer [Shaw] essentially commuted on two flights to get to the crew base … that doesn’t count in terms of duty time?”

M: “That is correct.”

H: “Do you think that affects the issue of fatigue? What is the nexus between commuting and fatigue?”

M: “… it’s very difficult for me to answer that question unless there was a specific issue [My comment: Isn't the Buffalo crash the specific issue at hand??] … We expect fatigue- management of our pilots, and we expect those professional pilots to be able to manage fatigue.”

H: “… I know I’ve flown a red-eye, in a real seat, and it’s pretty tough. And the first thing I want to do when I fly a red-eye is to find a bed someplace. In fact, she [Shaw] commented to one of the pilots that was flying her that there was a couch in the crew-room that had her name on it. … The Colgan policy is [pilots] are not supposed to sleep in the crew-room, but it turns out that they are sleeping in the crew-room. … What are the policies and procedures?”

M — “One of them is sleeping overnight, because it is not an adequate rest facility, is prohibited for our crew members … First Officer Shaw went through our pre-training program, she went through our CRM [Crew Rest Management] program. Within our CRM program, we gave that pilot [Shaw] some fatigue-management tools through her training. … if a pilot was found sleeping in the crew-room, we would discuss it with the pilot about what going on. We are also in complete dialog with our pilots on a crew-scheduling committee to try to adapt and prosper commutable scheduling-legs, to assist in this very challenging environment in Newark.”

H: “In the crew-member policy handbook it says, and I’m quoting: ‘While commuting by flight crew-members is understood and accepted by the company, in no way will commuting be deemed a mitigating factor in the flight crew-member’s scheduling, punctuality and demeanor. Flight crew-members will be fully accountable for their timely arrival and appearance at their base. Any and all expenses incurred because of commuting will be borne by the flight crew-member. Crew-members should not attempt to commute to their base the same day they’re scheduled to work.’ I don’t see anywhere in there where there any mention of the risks of commuting or the effects of commuting, in terms of fatigue … You’ve got a policy that acknowledges that pilots are going to commute … You’ve got a policy that says that crew-rooms are not to be used as motel rooms, but in fact they were — in many instances, that’s what they were being used for, for people to sleep. We’ve got a standard of the company that says that safety is our mission, our most-important objective — but we know from previous accidents that fatigue is a huge factor. … where does that all come together for someone who says, `Wait a minute: What is going on here?’”

M: “We totally agree, Member Higgins, with your assertation. [cq] Together with our vice president of safety, we’re fully engaged on this topic, and i can’t say there is a magic wand to correct that procedure. But with our pilot group, with our flight attendant group, and with management at Colgan Air, we’re going to do our due diligence to ensure we can mitigate this issue of fatigue as best as possible. I also look at fatigue as part of an element to complacency. And the complacency is a key ingredient in this factor.” [I warned you about this guy's syntax!]

Higgins then replied:

H – One of the things I learned since coming here [to the N.T.S.B., investigating aviation accidents] is sometimes the individual does not recognize fatigue. You don’t know how tired you really are. Fatigue has been compared to essentially driving drunk. It has the same effect on an individual as alcohol. … The question is, knowing the consequences of fatigue, what are the policies that are in place, or were in place, to mitigate fatigue? … When you put together the commuting patterns, the pay levels, the fact that your crew-rooms, which aren’t supposed to be used [as motels] are being used [as motels], I think that’s a recipe for an accident. And that is what we have here.”

************

NOTE: Here, via the N.T.S.B. Web site, is the full transcript of the cockpit voice recorder during the doomed Colgan flight.

###

May 12

–Written from on board an AirTran flight from Baltimore Washington International over the East Coast –

AirTran said today it would have all 136 of its 737 and 717 aircraft equipped with the Aircell Gogo Wi-Fi service by mid-summer.

AirTran’s announcement, held until this morning, was preempted, it seems to me, by an announcement yesterday afternoon from Delta Air Lines that it had completed installation of the Gogo Wi-Fi system on half of its 300 planes in its mainline domestic fleet, including all of the MD-88s, with the rest of the fleet to be completed by September.

That would seem to set up a kind of race between Delta and AirTran in their respective promises to be the first to have all domestic aircraft equipped with Wi-Fi by the end of summer. Delta, of course, has a fleet that is twice as big.

Aircell is the leader in in-flight Internet. In 2007, American Airlines and Virgin America became the first U.S. airlines to announce they would install Gogo Wi-Fi, but the rollout has been slow.

Also, bandwidth seems to be limited at times. On this demo flight, a handful of reporters using Wi Fi had to suddenly power down to enable the Today Show to go live with a feed. Television sucks up all energy! (Actually, the demands of broadcasting live television inflight put an extra strain on bandwidth, they tell me.)

One problem with this otherwise sparsely populated demo flight so far: AirTran planted its own executives and a lobbyist in the coach exit-rows and reserved the front of the cabin for TV. Back here in Row 19F, a cramped non-exit-row coach seat on a 737, I find it hard to open my laptop screen adequately on the little tray table to see the keyboard, let alone manipulate the mouse. I can’t imagine doing it in a middle seat wedged between two other passengers.

If every seat were full, this lack of adequate space would be a real challenge for someone using a standard laptop (though of course not a big problem for notebooks, and no problem at all for those with Smartphones and Blackberrys.)

On the other hand, the connection appears to be excellent, including for video-streaming.

###

May 12

As AirTran plans a splashy announcement this morning that it will have its entire domestic fleet equipped with Wi-Fi by summer’s end, Delta Air Lines said yesterday afgternoon that it has installed Wi-Fi on nearly half of its domestic mainline fleet, “making the airline the world’s leading provider of in-flight connectivity.”

Of more than 300 airplanes Delta operates on U.S. routes, 139 are equipped with the Gogo Inflight Internet, including the entire MD-88 fleet. In addition, the MD-90 fleet will be complete by the end of May with the remainder of the domestic fleet scheduled for completion by September.

Delta “is well on its way to offering guaranteed Wi-Fi every time our customers fly a mainline flight within the continental United States,” said Tim Mapes, Delta’s senior vice president for marketing. “We are fully committed to investing in innovative on-board technology that adds value for our customers be it in the form of seat-back satellite TV, on-demand movies or now Wi-Fi.”

Delta decided last year to equip its entire domestic fleet with Wi-Fi. The airline later expanded its installation plans to include approximately 200 Northwest airplanes, which are scheduled for completion next year. Then DCelta will have more than 500 aircraft offering Wi-Fi.

In addition to the MD-88s, Wi-Fi is now available on some 757-200s and MD-90s. Service is offered in both First and Economy class on a pay-per-flight basis. The cost of Wi-Fi access on a single Delta flight ranges from $7.95-$12.95. In June, customers also will be able to purchase month-long, unlimited use passes.

###

May 11

Just in case you were wondering whether airlines think the cost from aggravation to passengers is made up for by the money raised by slapping fees on checked bags, here is how much the domestic airlines collected in checked-bag fees during the fourth-quarter of 2008: $498.6 million. That’s triple the amount they collected in checked bag fees in the fourth quarter of 2007.

This is according to a report today from the Transportation Department’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

Six of the seven network carriers posted a combined loss of $1.7 billion in the quarter compared with $274 million in the 2007 fourth-quarter. Of the seven, only Alaska Airlines reported an operating profit.

Three low-cost airlines, Allegiant, Spirit and AirTran, had the top profit margins among the total 21 airlines — network, low-cost and regional — included in the report. Virgin America, Northwest and United had the largest operating loss margins.

###

May 11

—Starting Monday, American Airlines will allow passengers to use miles to book one-way award flights using half the miles required for a round-trip flight. That’s an innovation among major airlines’ mileage programs. And the airline also has changed the awards program to combine various awards levels on round-trip tickets and combined coach flights with first-class on round-trip awards. American calls the new program One-Way Flex Awards.

—I’m becoming more of a believer in the Priceline.com blind-bid method — assuming I know the general market where I am staying, and based on the assumption that chain hotels in various niches (three-star, four-star, five-star) have built consistency so well into their products. I suddenly had to book this morning for a room tonight near BWI. Went to the Priceline “Name Your Own Price” page and got the airport Marriott Courtyard for $75. Published rate on the Marriott Web site: $179.

Priceline seems to be doing ok in the travel turndown, as some other bookers struggle. Priceline today said its first-quarter gross travel bookings by consumers were $1.9 billion, an increase of 10.5% over the 2008 first-quarter. The company’s profit for the quarter was $208.3 million, up 15 percent.

The number of hotel-room nights it booked was up 36 percent.

###

May 10

Swine flu has now been found in 29 countries, with a total of 4,379 confirmed cases, the World Health Organization said in its latest update today.

While the flu’s affects have been relatively mild, deaths are occurring. Mexico has 45 deaths among 1,626 cases; the United States has the most cases, 2,254, with two deaths. Canada has 280 cases and one death and Costa Rica has eight cases and one death. Those are the only countries among th4e 29 where the flu has been found to report deaths from it.

The W.H.O. continues to state that travel restrictions are unnecessary.

Meanwhile, 300 guests and staff of the Metropark Hotel in Hong Kong were released Friday after a seven-day lockdown in the hotel because a Mexican man confirmed as having the swine flu had stayed there.

While some outsiders had derided the quarantine as an overreaction, Hong Kong officials have been extremely cognizant of their experience during the SARS outbreak in 2002 and 2003, which killed 299 in the city and shut down tourism and much international commerce for months.

###

May 10

SNAFU is an acronym that often misused to express the idea that something unexpected has gone wrong, as in “We have a SNAFU in the operating room.” Actually, SNAFU comes from cynical soldiers, at least as far back as World War II, and the acronym stands for “Situation Normal: All F—– Up.” In other words, poorly run business as usual. Grunts more recently came up with a more precise word to describe a system that suddenly goes all wrong: “Cluster f—.”

Anyway, both terms apply to the current situation involving the hapless Federal Aviation Administration and our antiquated national air-traffic control system, which has recently been shown to have been vulnerable to cyber-attacks as a gazillion-dollar planned revamp of the current system languishes years behind scheduled completion, the date for which is now 2025.

News accounts late last week cited a new report by the Inspector General’s office of the Transportation Department which said, in part, that the air-traffic control system has been hacked into in recent years, and that planned changes as part of the revamp are likely to introduce further openings for even more sophisticated future cyber-attacks, partly because of the dependence on commercial software being built into the new systems, which have already devoured billions and are expected to cost another $40 billion before they are in place.

Here’s a link to the full Inspector General’s report.

By the way, because of haggling over politics and dough, the FAA — responsible, remember, for the safety of our air-travel system — has been operating without an official administrator since September 2007.

###

May 8

The knucklehead at the White House who authorized the idiotic secret April 27 Air Force One flyover of New York City for a “photo op” has “resigned.”

Here, via a link from the New York Times online, is a commendably forthright report from the White House on how this egg got scrambled. The report states that its scope was “limited to White House involvement” in that idiotic stunt, which frightened tens of thousands of New Yorkers who looked up that day to see a great big airplane, flanked by Air Force jets, flying extremely low over the city.

Evidently it did not occur to the people who thought this stunt up — and insisted for some wholly unknown reason that the public not be notified in advance that a great big 747 was going to be flying at 1,000 feet over the city — that a great many people in New York would have a … bad reaction, considering what happened the last time they looked up and saw great big airplanes flying low over the skyline.

Now that the White House official, Louis Caldera, has walked the plank, it’s time to pick off the others involved: the Air Force colonel in charge of the 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews who helped plan it, the nitwit FAA official or officials who evidently were the ones to argue for secrecy and threaten other agencies if they informed the public in advance,and whichever state and local officials had a hand in this.

{In a report today, the CBS affiliate in New York, WCBS TV {{which weirdly has begun referring to itself as CBS 2 HD}}, described the FAA screw-up: “In a memo obtained by CBS 2 HD, the Federal Aviation Administration’s James Johnston said the agency was aware of ‘the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes’ in and around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the N.Y.P.D., the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor’s office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out.”]

There was no excuse for this dumb stunt. No one who had a hand in planning it ought to have a government job.

If these chowderheads hadn’t insisted on secrecy, they could have flown that passenger-less Air Force One all over the city with advance notice and wowed the citizens who paid for the “photo op.” Thousands would have been in the streets to take pictures. It would have been a splendid event, despite the criticism about however much it cost (evidently around $350,0000 total) for this photo-op that could just as easily and way more cheaply been a “Photoshop.”

But nooooo. They had to get out the “Secret” stamp. They just love the “Secret” stamp.

###


May 7

[Above: J. Edgar Hoover, Subversives-Hunter]

[Above: Jack Anderson, Columnist and 'Jackal']

[Above: Jack Anderson, terror suspect, and his Mom, Christine. Photo courtesy of Christine Anderson.]

I’ve done my best to try to straighten out the FBI terrorist watch list story over the last year. Every time I think it’s explained, off we go again into the rat’s nest.

Now comes news that the Inspector General’s Office of the Justice Department has found fault with the sloppy way the terrorist watch lists are maintained by the F.B.I. Terrorist Screening Center. Here’s a link to the news story and, for those of you truly, truly motivated, a link to the full report, in a long .pdf file on the Inspector General Web site.

The news accounts focus mostly on the finding in the report that lapses in the watch list maintenance can allow suspected terrorists to slip into the U.S. because they have not been “nominated” and confirmed to be listed.

But there is also some interesting reading on the various names that appear on the lists that seem to have nothing to do with any international terrorist threat. I give you, again, the case of Jack Anderson — or I should say, the multiple Jack Andersons who routinely get stopped at airport check-in and delayed for questioning because, it seems, some “version” of their identity appears on the official, secret lists, which are maintained by the F.B.I. in two categories — Do Not Fly and Selectee.

The truly bad list is “Do Not Fly,”  which contains the names and detailed information on fewer than 2,000 known terrorist suspects. My guess is that none of them are named Jack Anderson, or a close variant of same.

The jam-up for many people with common names (David Nelson is one) comes with the “Selectee” list, which contains the names and detailed information on people who are suspected of having some terrorist connections, but on whom the evidence is too slight to ban from flying, but sufficient enough, under the guidelines, to have them double-checked at the airports. Several thousand people are on this list, along with details about them. This list has been compiled over recent years from about a dozen various historical government and law-enforcement lists of various people under investigation, supposedly for terrorist connections, that eventually found their way into the FBI master data-bank.

Again, this makes some sense — assuming the master lists are well-maintained, which, as the Justice Department report points out, they are not.

The mess gets even more complicated because, for reasonable security reasons, the actual detailed lists maintained by the FBI are not disseminated to the airlines, whose unwanted responsibility it is to do the flagging at the gate. Instead, the airlines get bare-bones lists of names and variants of names, and (because of privacy concerns long argued by groups like the ACLU) no other personal information to help them match a passenger against a suspect. The airlines hate this responsibility, which leads to many “false positives” among their passengers, and I don’t blame them.

The Homeland Security Department is making a major fix to this system with a program, now being rolled out, called Secure Flight. Once it is fully in place by next year, airline passengers will have to provide enough personal information in advance of flying to allow the TSA (and not the airlines) to compare those names and identities with much more precision against the match with accuracy against the names and other information on the actual secret watch-lists.

In one of several interviews with me before he departed as the director of the TSA late last year, Kip Hawley explained the dilemma the airlines face, though he was also critical of what he regarded as the airlines’ lackadaisical approach to the problem of false positives, meaning the airlines routinely flagging people who really are not on the selectee list.

“The problem is all those people who think they’re on a watch list in fact are flying on airlines that don’t do a very good job of sorting out who is actually on the real watch-lists and whose name might be similar to someone on the No Fly or Selectee watch lists,” Hawley said.

“Let’s suppose a real person named Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed is on the [real] Selectee list. Well, if your name is Mohammed Mohammed Smith or Joe Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed, or Mohammed Bob Mohammed — depending on how the airline filters its list — you may end up with hundreds of other people with names like that getting flagged every time they fly, by an airline saying that you can’t get your boarding pass, you’re on the list, please come over to the ticket counter and prove to us who you are. A lot of those people think the government has them on a watch list because they always have to go over to the ticket counter and answer questions before they can fly. So all those people are going away mad, thinking, what’s the TSA got against me?”

The airlines have argued that they were handed an impossible and expensive logistical problem that forces them to error, when they do, on the side of great caution.

Anyway, Secure Flight will go a long way toward fixing that problem, though at some cost to personal privacy (the government will now know more in advance about every air traveler’s plans). Being able to match you, the innocent traveler, against the actual person on the terrorist list who shares nothing with you except some possible vague variant of name or alias, will solve a problem for lots of fliers with common names who routinely get needlessly flagged, despite their repeated attempts to get their names off the list.

Take Jack Anderson, age 7 when he got the third-degree last year when flying with his mother, Christine, his two brothers and their grandmother on a trip to Disney World. The family thought they would miss their flight till airline security finally cleared Jack about an hour after he was detained.

Christine Anderson did a good job making her case publicly that young Jack, who was first flagged at age 2, is obviously not a terrorist, or someone with known terrorist connections. Under Secure Flight, young Jack will immediately come up as a child whose particulars do not match those of the actual Jack Anderson on the watch list.

Good!

But wait a minute: Why is there a “Jack Anderson” on the watch-list in the first place?

I can only guess here, but I’d say the Selectee list probably contains the name and particulars of Jack Anderson, the muckraking columnist who was on the Nixon White House enemies’ list and who was relentlessly investigated by the FBI under the paranoid J. Edgar Hoover, who in fact referred to Anderson as a “jackal” for unearthing various unpleasantries and scandals involving the agency during the unfortunate (and seemingly interminable) Hoover era.

In its recent audit of the Terrorist Watch Lists, the Justice Department Inspector General’s office reported that over one third of the names and identities on the lists “were associated with FBI cases that did not contain current international terrorism or domestic terrorist cases …” The report continued, “Rather, many of these watch-listed records were associated with outdated terrorism-case classifications or case-classifications unrelated to terrorism, and had been nominated [to the list] by various FBI field offices and headquarters units.”

Hmmm, could it be that Hoover’s and Nixon’s files on Jack Anderson, respected journalist and patriotic American, still linger in the data-banks that make up the Terrorist Watch Lists rat’s nest?

One of Jack Anderson’s sons, Kevin, a Salt Lake City lawyer, certainly thinks so. When I first wrote about the seven-year-old Jack Anderson last summer, Kevin Anderson e-mailed me with this question about the list:

“How come it includes my Dad, a respected journalist, and anyone with the same name, including some little kid? And with all their resources, how come the FBI doesn’t know that they’re looking for a dead man?”

Jack Anderson the columnist died in 2005.

###

May 5

Clobbered by the economy and by extremely poor public perceptions that began when those three Detroit CEOs swanned into Washington on their corporate jets demanding taxpayer bailouts last November, the business aviation industry has now had a frightening look at how badly things can go wrong, and how quickly.

Deliveries of general aviation airplanes fell 41.1 percent, to 462 planes, in the first quarter (compared with the 2008 first quarter), says the General Aviation Manufacturers Association. Industry billings fell 18.2 percent to $4.34 billion.

This from the trade group’s chief executive, Pete Bunce:

“We are dealing first and foremost with the severe negative effects of a worldwide economic downturn, but also with unwarranted criticism focused on the industry. The result has been the cancellation of orders for new airplanes and the loss of more than 15,000 high-paying jobs for American workers over the last several months. The reality is that the U.S. general aviation industry leads the world in innovation and remains one of the few American industries with a positive balance of trade.”

We’re not just talking about business jets here. Deliveries of piston airplanes fell was down 55.1 percent in the first quarter. Turboprops — increasingly popular as trade-downs by corporate flight departments who are afraid of public perceptions with jets, actually grew slightly, with deliveries up 3.4 percent.

Business jet deliveries fell 35.7 percent, to 191 airplanes compared to 297 business jets in the first quarter of 2008.

###

« Previous Entries Next Entries »