Austrian Airlines today announced a new phase in their attempt to increase efficiencies and profitability that will take place throughout 2013.

After a thorough analysis during the preceding 2 quarters that involved reviews of their administrative and technical operations including those of Tyrolean Airways, Austrian has found ways to further reduce expenses by an additional €10 million above and beyond the savings they’ve already identified this year.

The savings does not come without a price. After the review, it was also decided that 150 administrative positions would be eliminated. This amounts to a 2.3% reduction in personnel. Austrian will have 6170 employees after these actions are taken. Austrian however is working with the “Works Council” to help those that will be affected by the job cuts.

The cuts do not come as a surprise since Austrian was aware of a fair amount of duplicity between the operations of Tyrolean Airways and Austrian. The biggest change will be that Tyrolean’s flight control operations will be merged with Austrian’s in Vienna, and all flight administration operations will be based in beautiful Innsbruck. Additionally, technical maintenance will be consolidated to Tyrolean since they technically hold the Air Operator Certificate that is required for an airline to function.

In the press release by Austrian today, CEO Jaan Albrecht added that “The difficult conditions prevailing on markets do not leave us any choice. We have to increase our organization’s efficiency and to eliminate redundancies in the entire Group. This especially applies to duplications in our organizations, of which we have been aware for a number of years.”

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | No Comments

MySkyStatus is a great tool from Lufthansa that lets you integrate your social communities and let your friends, family, fans and and any other kind of “followers” know when you board a flight anytime and anywhere in the world.

Even though it is a Lufthansa app, you can enter flights from over 1000 different Airlines which really makes this a powerful tool for your travel app toolbox. Once you enter your flights, your social community followers will receive an update once you depart, an update while enroute, and an update when you arrive. This especially comes in handy for letting friends and loved ones that your flight has arrived safely at it’s destination.

You can enter your flight information without signing up for the program and link alerts to your social community accounts or enter the email addresses for the people that you want to receive an email of your flight activity. However, by signing up for the service (it’s free and does not require you to be a member of Lufthansa’s Miles & More) you can enter and manage all of your flights as well as see past flight information. My recommendation would be to sign up for MySkyStatus so that it’s easier for you to manage your flight activity and alert settings. If you are concerned about privacy, the app allows you to block other MySkyStatus users from seeing your flight activity, so you have good control as who does and doesn’t see your flight information.

The MySkyStatus home screen shows current user statistics:

Once you sign up, it’s 2 simple steps to get your flight information entered (click on each image to enlarge):

The first screen will ask you for your flight information:

Next, you can choose your Social Community and Email preferences:

The last screen shows your flight information (clicking the “+” button allows you to edit or delete the flight):

Then as you travel, your followers and email alert recipients will receive the following types of messages:

I know that there are a lot of different apps out there that provide flight information and alerts for you and for those that you want to know of your plans. I would recommend that you give MySkyStatus a try (Click here to go to MySkyStatus.com).

In using it myself, I’ve found that it does actually simplify my workload. MySkyStatus really does help me consolidate my efforts in letting friends and family be aware of my flight information regardless of what social community service they are subscribed to. If you need help figuring it out, or have any other questions, feel free to send me an email or leave a comment on this post.

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | One Comment

In news coming out of India, the Star Alliance has extended an invitation to Indian carrier Jet Airways to become the newest member of Star Alliance and join EVA Air as new member-elects to the world’s largest airline alliance. Though this has been in the news previously, it may be resurfacing again.

According to the “Centre For Asia Pacific Aviation”, the invitation had been extended but the Indian Government insists that it will not allow Jet to join the Alliance unless Air India is accepted first. Yes you read that correctly. The airline that was on the cusp of membership in recent months after a 3 1/2 year application period, who has befallen on disastrous economic times, is being used as leverage and Jet Airways stands to be the biggest loser if Star Alliance does not accept Air India in some quasi-package deal.

To me this is simply a transparent ploy by the Indian government to offload a struggling airline into an alliance in the hopes that membership will cure Air India’s woes. Unfortunately, AI’s problems run far deeper than can be fixed by any membership in any alliance. Operating losses and outdating technology platforms have been the major obstacles to alliance membership.

With Jet being the best positioned to succeed, India is willing to threaten the success of yet another Indian based carrier. Have they not learned their lesson with Air India and Kingfisher?

This development follows a recent meeting that was held recently by Lufthansa’s CEO Christoph Franz and Jet’s Chairman Naresh Goyal ahead of Jet beginning new service to Frankfurt and Munich. Personally, the timing of the meeting was a little bit more than interesting to me at this point.

If I had a crystal ball, I think I would see the capitulation of the Indian goverment, who will remove their demands, and will finally let one of their national carriers join an alliance. Maybe.

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | 2 Comments

This time its NY’s Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer urging legistlation to allow families to sit together without incurring additional fees for premium seats sometimes charged by airlines. He’s reacting to press last week about how families are being “targeted” and are being forced to pay additional fees when trying to sit together.

Airlines in some cases charge premiums for window or aisle seats, and when a family of 3-4 or more travel, they are almost always forced to have 1 or 2 members in this type of “premium” seat, thus creating this added fiscal stress.

The Senator is expected to send a letter to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood urging him to implement rules that would prevent such an affront to the traveling family. Well guess what, should that rule be enacted, fares will go up beyond what the fee would have been (at least thats how airlines have historically reacted). Perhaps airlines will get creative and even charge a higher fare if you are booking more than 2 seats at a time.

I can’t agree with the Senator on this one (or much else that he has proposed in the past) simply because in my opinion, he’s trying to turn this into an entitlement issue that then actually reverse discrimates against those who don’t have children but would still have to pay a premium for sitting in a premium seat on an aircraft.

A family traveling together with a bit of planning can easily accomplish sitting together. Whether its sitting in pairs or using the middle seats on a wide body, it’s easy to accomplish.

Now I expect a fair share of you will disagree with me on this point, but being one without children I am not a big fan of fees being waived for the family who decides to pile into an airplane for their once a year trip to Disneyland while others like myself who fly frequently, and provide far more revenue to the airlines, are forced to pay more for the same seat.

But I am curious, what do you think? Should families be entitled to fee waivers when traveling together, or should they be treated like any other passenger? The polls are open:

Should The Government Force Airlines To Waive Fees For Families Traveling Together For The Sake Of Seating Convenience?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

___

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | 16 Comments

Appearing on Reuters tonight, it appears that union leaders at United Airlines are asking its members to go forward with a vote to determine if United pilots would strike as a response to negotiations breaking down after 2 years of impasse on a new contract.

A vote like this would only authorize the potential of a strike and does not in anyway indicated that a strike would be imminent. In my opinion I think its more of a negotiation tactic being used by the union to bring management back to the bargaining table in an attempt to ratify new contracts for United’s 12,000 pilots.

It would be difficult for any US based airline to have it’s pilots walk out in a strike because the White House would have the ability to “forbid” the strike since it would not be in the best interest of American Commerce.

I really don’t expect United pilots to even come close to walking off the job, but in case you start to see more talk of this in the media, take it with a grain of salt. A lot of things would have to go drastically wrong for the pilots to ever reach the point of walking off the job.

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | 4 Comments

I came across an interesting story today that discussed a recent transaction where Boeing has agreed to accept 5 China Eastern Airbus A340 as a trade-in towards a $6 billion deal that has China Eastern buying 20 Boeing 777′s. At the same time, Airbus will be taking back the other half of the A340 fleet in trade towards the purchase of 15 new A330s.

In the cutthroat business of airliner sales, it is extremely rare for a manufacturer to take in trade-ins of competitor aircraft. No doubt Boeing will want to get these Airbuses off it’s “lot” as soon as possible. You can probably get yourself a good deal.

The Reuters Article:

(Reuters) – Boeing (BA.N) may soon be looking for buyers for long-range passenger jets built by arch-rival Airbus (EAD.PA) under a rare trade-in deal with China’s third largest airline that underscores all-out competition between the planemakers.

The U.S. planemaker has agreed to buy half of China Eastern’s (600115.SS) (0670.HK) fleet of 10 Airbus A340 jets as part of a $6 billion deal to sell 20 Boeing 777s to the airline, the Shanghai carrier said in a stock exchange filing on Monday.

Airbus has itself agreed to take back the other half of China Eastern’s A340 fleet as part of a separate deal to sell 15 A330 jets, but faces likely delays in getting the deal done due to a row between China and Europe over emissions.

The two deals lift a veil on an obscure corner of the jetliner industry, where planes are traded in like used cars.

Just like car dealerships, the world’s dominant aircraft manufacturers sometimes offer to take back their old models when trying to persuade airlines to upgrade to the latest models, in an industry with $100 billion in annual new sales.

But experts agree it is unusual for aircraft to cross over the barrier separating Airbus and Boeing in their combative duopoly, and when they do it stokes up emotions on both sides.

“It sometimes happens but it is not their preferred route at all,” said Karl Bruenjes, managing director of UK-based RPK Capital Management, a specialist in second-hand aircraft.

The deal echoes a move by Boeing to buy A340s from Singapore Airlines in the mid-1990s including some still in assembly. Back then, the aim was to support a blockbuster sale of 777s. When delivery came there was a brief spat over whether Airbus would support the A340s, according to people familiar with the deal.

The subsequent trading spawned a joke inside Boeing headquarters that Boeing had placed more A340s than Airbus that year — a source of irritation for Airbus that may be repeated if Boeing quickly sells the jets it plans to buy this time.

Airbus halted production of the slow-selling A340 last year.

In 1984, according to industry sources and web databases, Boeing bought a handful of brand-new Airbus A310 models assigned to Kuwait Airways to allow the airline to take Boeings instead.

In the European camp, in 2008 Air Algerie told the United States that Airbus had offered to buy its entire Boeing fleet to prise open a key Boeing client, according to an unconfirmed account in a cable marked “sensitive” and released by Wikileaks.

Airbus said its policy was not to buy Boeing airplanes.

“It is very rare in this industry that someone buys their competitor’s aircraft. We do not do it,” sales chief John Leahy told Reuters.

Boeing said it did not comment on specific transactions, but a spokesman added: “In general it is fair to say that at times we do take airplanes in trade, including occasionally non-Boeing airplanes, as part of our orders transactions.”

DIFFICULT SECOND-HAND MARKET

The A340 entered service boasting “four engines for long haul” in 1993, shortly before the 777 ushered in an era of two engines for all but the biggest aircraft or the longest routes.

While the 777 enjoyed record sales last year, Airbus decided to halt production of the A340, which was outsold four to one.

China Eastern’s A340 fleet includes five A340-600s, until recently the world’s longest jetliner and still relatively young at an average age of 8.3 years.

According to UK consultancy Ascend, the notional market value of these jets, which are due to be sold to Boeing, is $55 million each, but some dealers called the figure optimistic.

“The A340 is a difficult market and they will be competing with the manufacturer,” Bruenjes said, noting that Airbus already has nine A340s on its own list of trade-ins for sale.

“The value will mainly be in the engines, not so much the airframe. An existing operator might be interested in getting some at cheap prices, but we wouldn’t pay more than $30 million each, and that’s if we looked at them at all,” Bruenjes said.

Airbus faces an even tougher task if gets the green light from Beijing, since its half of the proposed A340 fleet trade-in is older at roughly 15 years and the model has less range.

Ascend’s market value for those five A340-300 jets is $15 million each, but Bruenjes estimated a seller would be lucky to get much more than the value of the engines — some $4 million.

The A340 averaged $250 million new at list prices before it was taken out of production. In practice jetmakers take trade-ins to facilitate new sales rather than make extensive profits.

Airbus says a future jet, the carbon-composite A350-1000, will leapfrog the 777 and wrest back one of the most lucrative parts of the global airliner market from Boeing. Pending that jet’s arrival in 2017, the smaller A330 is selling well and the 777 is said to compete on occasions with the much larger A380.

Boeing is considering revamping the 777 to protect its grip on the 300-400 seat market and try to pre-empt the challenge from the A350-1000, which is still trying to establish momentum.

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | 3 Comments

Received an email today from United allowing me to enroll into the TSA’s prescreening program. Initially the program will roll out at Chicago’s O’hare and New York’s Newark (Well New Jersey actually, but I won’t give Jersey the the benefit of the doubt!).

According to the program, you will no longer have to remove Shoes, Belts or Jackets or your Liquids (the 3-1-1 bag). Additionally, your laptop can stay in your carry-on as well!

It looks like a targeted email. When I clicked on the link it had my Trusted Traveller Program ID # already prefilled. Several months ago Continental was letting you sign up to be alerted when the Trusted Traveler Program came to the airline. I suspect anyone that signed up at that point was targeted for this email!

FINALLY! :)

The EMAIL:

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | 4 Comments

According FlightGlobal, Lufthansa has accepted the technical delivery of their first 747-8i and is tentatively scheduled to leave Seattle and fly to Frankfurt on May 1. Good news indeed! The inaugural first flight between Frankfurt and Washington DC should happen in early June if all goes to plan. The aircraft will spend time at Technik in Hamburg to have the finishing touches put on prior to entering daily service! I’m thinking its time for this LufthansaFlyer to be in Frankfurt for the “Official” introduction in June!!

The FlightGlobal Story:

Star Alliance carrier Lufthansa today took possession of its inaugural 747-8 Intercontinental, marking the first delivery of the type to a passenger airline.

Certified in December, the GEnx-2B-powered aircraft, list priced at $333 million, features an 8,000nm (14,816km) range and capacity for 467 passengers in a three-class cabin.

Lufthansa will launch services with the 747-8I later this year between Frankfurt and Washington-Dulles, Los Angeles and Chicago-O’Hare. The aircraft will be configured with 362 seats, including 262 in economy class, 92 in business and eight in first class. The carrier was the launch customer for the type, and has 20 aircraft on order.

“After working together for many years, we are very pleased to have the newest generation of four-engine aircraft join our fleet,” says Christoph Franz, chief executive officer of Deutsche Lufthansa AG.

Boeing says Lufthansa employees are conducting “airline-specific preparations” to get the airplane ready for a 1 May flight from Seattle to its permanent home base in Frankfurt.

The airframer in February delivered the first 747-8I to an unnamed VIP customer.

Compared to the 747-400, Boeing says the 747-8I will provide double-digit improvements in fuel burn and emissions and 30% less noise.

Boeing plans to deliver approximately 35 to 43 total Boeing 747-8I and 747-8F freighter aircraft this year. The company certified the 747-8F in August and made first delivery to Cargolux in October.

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | No Comments

Being reported by Bloomberg.com today, United has walked away from discussions with Airbus and will negotiate solely with Boeing for a potential order of 200 737-800 narrow body jets. At retail prices, it would amount to approximately a 16.9 billion dollar sale for Boeing. A portion of the 200 jet order may be an option for aircraft and not a firm order. Nevertheless this will be seen as a significant victory for Boeing over it’s European based rival.

Bloomberg.com’s Article:

United Continental Holdings Inc. (UAL) is negotiating only with Boeing Co. (BA) for an order of about 200 narrow-body jets after dropping discussions with Airbus SAS (EAD), two people familiar with the matter said.

Talks had been under way for at least six months about a mix of current-generation Boeing 737s or Airbus A320s plus variants with new, more-efficient engines, said the people, who declined to be identified because details aren’t public.

A United deal would cement ties to a longtime customer and build on Boeing’s victory over Airbus in winning a 100-plane purchase from Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) in August. Airbus and Boeing, split a 460-jet order with AMR Corp. (AAMRQ)’s American Airlines in July. The list value for 200 737s would be about $16.9 billion, based on the $84.4 million retail price of the 737-800.
“If United goes with Boeing for this order we see this as a helpful market-share gain,” Robert Stallard, an RBC Capital Markets analyst in New York, said in a note to clients. He has an outperform rating on Boeing, which like United is based in Chicago.
Spokesmen for United, Boeing and Toulouse, France-based Airbus all declined to comment about the status of the latest negotiations.

Boeing slid 0.9 percent to $72.86 at the close in New York as U.S. stocks slumped, while United, the world’s largest airline, fell 0.3 percent to $22.85. Airbus parent European Aeronautic, Defence & Space Co. dropped 4.4 percent to 29.25 euros earlier in Paris.

Some of the planes in the 200-jet total may be options for future aircraft, said the people. The value of the order may rise once United settles on terms, because the 737-800 is less expensive than the so-called MAX model with upgraded engines. Airlines typically buy at a discount.

An all-Boeing order would also benefit CFM International, the General Electric Co (GE).-Safran SA (SAF) venture that makes the only engines used on the 737. CFM competes with United Technologies Corp. (UTX)’s Pratt & Whitney unit on the A320neo model.

The 737 is the world’s most widely flown airliner, and Boeing planes account for more than three-fourths of the main fleet of 701 jets at United Continental, which was formed in the 2010 merger between UAL Corp. and Continental Airlines Inc.

Continental had an exclusive relationship with Boeing dating back two decades. The new United is run by Jeff Smisek, who joined Continental in 1995 and was chief executive officer during the merger talks. United’s fleet management group is overseen by Gerry Laderman, senior vice president of finance and treasurer, who joined Continental in 1988.

“It will be a nice win for Boeing and GE,” Jeff Sprague, co-founder of Stamford, Connecticut-based Vertical Research Partners, said in a telephone interview. “Although the new company is called United, it’s really being run by Continental management and they’ve always been a Boeing carrier. It was probably natural for them to go toward Boeing and CFM for fleet commonality.”
Boeing is trying to reclaim the top spot in commercial production lost to Airbus in 2003. Airbus had record orders of 1,419 aircraft last year, while Boeing’s tally was 805. Airbus has said 2012 orders may fall by half as an initial flurry of purchases of its A320neo wanes.

United is refreshing a single-aisle fleet that includes Boeing 757-200s, with an average age of 18.2 years, and 737-500s that average 16.6 years old. Boeing no longer makes either model.

Before the merger creating the new airline, UAL’s United agreed in December 2009 to split an order for 50 wide-body jets between Boeing and Airbus. That deal was for 25 Boeing 787 Dreamliners and the same number of Airbus A350s.

To contact the reporters on this story: Andrea Rothman in Barcelona via aerothman@bloomberg.net; Mary Jane Credeur in Atlanta at mcredeur@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ed Dufner at edufner@bloomberg.net.

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | 8 Comments

With the growing momentum surrounding a potential US Air bid for American Airlines, I’m curious what you are thinking as far as the look of the new company and alliance allegiance should be if the two airlines combine. I know that this is a simplistic approach since there are many variables involved with alliance membership, but I’m sure opinions are out there!!

Cast your vote below!

What would you like to see as the outcome of a potential US Airways / American Airlines Merger?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | 6 Comments

Back in January, I had posted about Turkish’s desire to own LOT and based on reports today out of Warsaw, it looks that Turkish has moved one step closer to it becoming reality.

Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita suggested that Turkish has concluded its due diligence review of LOT’s financial condition. In the newspaper article, it was suggested that LOT carried a value of 2 billion zloty ($630 million dollars).

Additionally a spokesperson for Poland’s Treasury suggested that an adviser will be retained in May to assist with any sale.

I suspect that within 2 years, the European Airline landscape will be radically different. Just in the past few weeks Finnair, SAS and TAP Portugal have all indicated a willingness as a target for acquisition or partnership.

Posted by LufthansaFlyer | No Comments

« previous home top