Insulin Pumps – TSA Responds

Posted by Marshall Jackson on July 10, 2009 under Safety and Security | 10 Comments to Read

Many of you read my recent post about the downright unnecessary experience I endured at Washington Dulles International last week.  The folks that monitor Twitter.com for TSA were kind enough to provide a link to TSA’s website to submit feedback, and I took them up on the opportunity.  Today, I received what appeared to be a reply crafted by an actual person.  I will post it here in its entirety minus the name of the individual who sent the email.

Dear Mr. Jackson

I am the Customer Service Manager at Washington Dulles International
Airport for TSA. Your message regarding your recent travel through
Dulles was forwarded to me for review.
First of all, let me apologize for any inconvenience you encountered.
Our goal is to provide efficient, effective and courteous screening of
passengers as they pass through our checkpoint. Many of our procedures
can be a hassle for you, and can be looked upon as a nuisance. That is
clearly not our intention. Our main objective is to provide maximum
security for all our passengers, and to do so with understanding and
consideration for the traveling public.

Our screening procedures are specific and do include screening of
insulin pumps. The fact that the process may differ can be attributed
to several factors, including size and location of the device.
Effective December 22, 2005 Transportation Security Officers began
conducting additional screening procedures on randomly selected
passengers. The additional screening procedures created a more complex
and less predictable system for those who wish to circumvent our system.
Passengers are randomly selected for an additional search, even if they
do not trigger an alarm as they pass through the metal detector. This
search could be a hand-wanding, a pat-down, explosives screening or a
search of the person’s carry-on bag. By design, a traveler is not likely
to experience that same search every time he or she files.

We understand and regret any discomfort and inconvenience you
experienced as a result of the additional screening procedures.
Nevertheless, we believe that these security measures are necessary and
appropriate for ensuring the safety and confidence of all air travelers.
Furthermore, TSA continues to develop and deploy new technologies,
including document scanners, trace portals, and backscatter devices to
address the explosives threat.

Again, thank you for sharing your concerns. We take your comments
seriously, and appreciate your feedback . It provides us with an
opportunity to focus our efforts on areas that need improvement and are
of importance to the traveling public.

And there you have it.  I’m still not pleased, but at least I received what I feel to be a response that was not computer generated.  I did reply to the email, because I wanted to make sure the sender knew that it was very clear to me that I was sent to secondary screening specifically because I was wearing an insulin pump.  Perhaps the security officer who performed the additional screening was attempting to fill his quota for explosive trace detection tests for the day, I dunno.  The fact that every square millimeter of my belongings, including the palms of my hands, were tested for traces of explosives just because I wear an insulin pump was overkill, plain and simple.

Bookmark and Share
  1. Victoria said,

    That’s really interesting. When I was screened, I had the impression that they were going to do these extra procedures every time because I had an insulin pump. It sounds like TSA may need to pass on the message to their screeners then that this is to be a “random” process, because otherwise their policy sounds like it *will* be a hassle every time I fly. Thanks for sharing this information!

  2. TSA at Washington Dulles (IAD) Sees Security Threat in Insulin Pumps » Marshall Jackson on Travel said,

    [...] can review my post about TSA’s response here. var addthis_pub = ”; var addthis_language = ‘en’;var addthis_options = ‘email, favorites, digg, [...]

  3. Jeff said,

    Great post.. check out this travel resource through LinkedIn, it has treated me very well. http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=2072193&trk=anet_ug_grppro

  4. Jim Lund said,

    Read the customer service response carefully and it does not say what the standard procedure is. Thus, it still may be that they can pull us out and do what they did to Marshall to all of us.

  5. Ian said,

    Sometimes you have to wonder about airport security… a couple of years ago I worked close to Darwin airport’s terminal and would often wander up to the terminal to get a coffee in the morning when the terminal was quiet. This involved going thru security as the coffee shop was on the secure side. The security officers all knew me as I would come and go frequently, and would often give me the explosives swab so they could get their quota of “random” swabs done when the terminal was quiet so that they didn’t need to do it at peak period. Clever.

  6. Michelle said,

    I have just returned today from San Francisco to LAX. My experience with the TSA search for both the outbound and return trip at both airports resulted in both a wand scan and “pat down”. I had the explosive “swab” on a previous flight. At LAX, before entering the walk thru, I informed the TSA personnel that I was wearing an insulin pump and even held it in my hand to show them before placing it back under my sweater.I was immediately sent to another area between two glass plates and then to the “fishbowl” for the search. Before leaving the walk thru area, was asked if I had other belongings other than what was scanned on the belt and if I was traveling with anyone else. I expected to be scanned but at LAX, I was not initially wand-scanned but physically “patted” down. I asked why was she patting me and not scanning me. The lady replied because they said the alarm went off. I did not go through the walk through so I do not know where the alarm went off. I stood there while she back hand rubbed me between my legs, on my buttocks, under my breasts, down my back under my arms down my legs out in public view. Leaving San Francisco, I again,informed TSA that I was wearing an insulin pump. I was again sent behind 2 glass plates and then moved to the “fishbowl” for the search. This time I was scanned with the wand. I thought to myself, no problem. But once again, the TSA person now begins to back hand pat me down from neck to feet, front and back, between my legs and down my behind and under my breast. Is the “pat down” necessary when a person has already declared they are wearing a medical device? I understand the necessity of passenger screening but I view the actions of these individuals as “overkill” due to lack of training, awareness and a Rambo attitude.

  7. Cindy Leacox said,

    I fly regularly (with my insulin pump), in fact I only spent 4 months at home last year. I have NEVER been asked to step aside for a special screening because of my insulin pump until yesterday (28Jan2010). I offered them information about the device thinking that maybe they did not understand what it was and the person brought over a supervisor who would not discuss it with me nor would she take the information from me. Again, I have not had this experience at any airport prior to yesterday at MLI.
    Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the reasons for the screening processes but in this case it is a waste of my time and our tax dollars. It seems some training about the device would be useful for TSA.

  8. Marshall Jackson said,

    Hi Cindy,

    Thanks for reading. I haven’t had a screening experience like the one I got at IAD since. I have been sent to secondary, had my pump and hands swabbed for explosive trace detecting, and then been promptly sent on my way.

    I believe TSA is randomly selecting insulin pump wearers for enhanced screening, and I guess I’m fine with that….to a point. But that IAD screening experience was over the top, unnecessary, and a waste of my time and TSA’s.

  9. Jan said,

    I had the same long process, but can take it a step further. I was flying out of Eastern Iowa Airport on February 19, 2010. I set off the alarm the first time, and I and my carry-ons were completing searched and swabbed. The flight took off and turned around due to landing gear issues. We were directed back to the airline’s desk to re-set up. We then went back through security, and my pump did not alarm. Unfortunately, the TSA security person saw the pump and pulled my out of line. I had a second full body and carry-on search and swab down. The person doing the carry-on search was the same person who had performed it the first time. When we complained to the TSA supervisor, we were told that it was the rules. The first time that it happened, I accepted it. At least TSA doesn’t try to make me take off my pump (the airline tried that once in 2002). But the second time in less than an hour with the same personnel was insulting and humiliating.

    The next day, we proceeded through TSA in LAX with a great deal of trepidation. Not only did I not alarm, they didn’t perform any additional searches.

    I’m now getting ready to take my return trip home. I was searching to see if there was a way to remove my pump and pass it through for swabbing separately, so that at least I and my carry-ons could be spared.

  10. Marshall Jackson said,

    Jan,

    I think they’ve decided to pull pumpers at random. At least that’s the way it’s been working so far for me. Recently, TSA announced that it would start swabbing the palms of all travelers at random for traces of explosives, so everyone is going to get a taste of the fun.

    Since my IAD experience, I’ve been pulled for limited secondary from time to time with a swab of the pump and my hands. Nothing nearly as intrusive, unnecessary, and wasteful of security resources as I got at Dulles that day.

  11. Add A Comment