<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Airways to Charge Extra for Some Seats; Hold on to Your Hats for Other Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/2008/04/17/us-airways-to-charge-extra-for-some-seats-hold-on-to-your-hats-for-other-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/2008/04/17/us-airways-to-charge-extra-for-some-seats-hold-on-to-your-hats-for-other-changes/</link>
	<description>The Daily Airline News by Jared Blank</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: onlinetravelreview</title>
		<link>http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/2008/04/17/us-airways-to-charge-extra-for-some-seats-hold-on-to-your-hats-for-other-changes/#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>onlinetravelreview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/2008/04/17/us-airways-to-charge-extra-for-some-seats-hold-on-to-your-hats-for-other-changes/#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>True, the US Airways merger was only an operational disaster for a bit, but the bigger issue is the ongoing labor issues there as evidenced by the US Airways pilots kicking their union out in an unprecedented move.  I think you and I both agree that US Airways' management team is fantastic, but another merger in this environment sounds like a distraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, the US Airways merger was only an operational disaster for a bit, but the bigger issue is the ongoing labor issues there as evidenced by the US Airways pilots kicking their union out in an unprecedented move.  I think you and I both agree that US Airways&#8217; management team is fantastic, but another merger in this environment sounds like a distraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iahphx</title>
		<link>http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/2008/04/17/us-airways-to-charge-extra-for-some-seats-hold-on-to-your-hats-for-other-changes/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>iahphx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/2008/04/17/us-airways-to-charge-extra-for-some-seats-hold-on-to-your-hats-for-other-changes/#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>Lots of people think it's 5 bucks for a "choice" seat assignment here.  Nope -- that's only for the short flights.  I think the price goes as high as $30 for long hauls.

FWIW, I like a good seat as much as the next guy, and will go to some trouble to get one.  For instance, as a Continental platinum, I can get "elite seating" on their partner airlines as well, but I usually have to call.  For Delta, that usually means talking to a poorly trained rep in India who's likely not to understand my request.  I still call most of the time.

But to actually PAY for the better seat?  I just don't think I'd do that.  I guess I'm a little cheap, but parting with money to get off the plane a minute or two faster doesn't make sense for me.

The better market is probably corporate customers -- heck, I'd part with somebody else's cash for the convenience!  But I wonder how many corporate travel dept's have provisions that allow reimbursement for this.

I guess enough do, because it's becoming an increasingly popular option.

As far as another merger being "a mess" for US Airways, I guess we'll see.  The last "mess" seems severely hyped by the media, as the "really bad" inconvenience lasted only a couple days, and the "annoying" inconvenience probably a month or two.  I would say it was par with the inconvenience United caused its pax in December when they ran out of pilots to fly their x-mas schedule, and that barely registered a pulse in the media.  US Airways now has one of the best ops in the industry.  You'd think Parker might like to keep it that way, given the history here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of people think it&#8217;s 5 bucks for a &#8220;choice&#8221; seat assignment here.  Nope &#8212; that&#8217;s only for the short flights.  I think the price goes as high as $30 for long hauls.</p>
<p>FWIW, I like a good seat as much as the next guy, and will go to some trouble to get one.  For instance, as a Continental platinum, I can get &#8220;elite seating&#8221; on their partner airlines as well, but I usually have to call.  For Delta, that usually means talking to a poorly trained rep in India who&#8217;s likely not to understand my request.  I still call most of the time.</p>
<p>But to actually PAY for the better seat?  I just don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d do that.  I guess I&#8217;m a little cheap, but parting with money to get off the plane a minute or two faster doesn&#8217;t make sense for me.</p>
<p>The better market is probably corporate customers &#8212; heck, I&#8217;d part with somebody else&#8217;s cash for the convenience!  But I wonder how many corporate travel dept&#8217;s have provisions that allow reimbursement for this.</p>
<p>I guess enough do, because it&#8217;s becoming an increasingly popular option.</p>
<p>As far as another merger being &#8220;a mess&#8221; for US Airways, I guess we&#8217;ll see.  The last &#8220;mess&#8221; seems severely hyped by the media, as the &#8220;really bad&#8221; inconvenience lasted only a couple days, and the &#8220;annoying&#8221; inconvenience probably a month or two.  I would say it was par with the inconvenience United caused its pax in December when they ran out of pilots to fly their x-mas schedule, and that barely registered a pulse in the media.  US Airways now has one of the best ops in the industry.  You&#8217;d think Parker might like to keep it that way, given the history here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
