<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Have Airlines Removed from Aircraft to Save Weight?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinetravelreview.com/2008/07/15/what-have-airlines-removed-from-aircraft-to-save-weight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinetravelreview.com/2008/07/15/what-have-airlines-removed-from-aircraft-to-save-weight/</link>
	<description>Airline News and Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinetravelreview.com/2008/07/15/what-have-airlines-removed-from-aircraft-to-save-weight/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/?p=2342#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>OK.  This is just mean.

"In removing seatback phones from its MD-80s and B737-400s, another airline shed 200 pounds per airplane, translating into 3,400+ gallons saved annually"

average passenger + 1 bag = at least 200 pound
3400 gallons of fuel @ 3.19 a gallon (what AA paid last Q = $10,846
10.846 / 365 = $29 a day
number of passengers on a MD-80 plane:  about 140?
 capacity:  probably around 80%
number of paying seats:  lets say 110
average price of  a segment on a MD-80 medium haul ticket:  about $175
what the airline pulls in on that plane per segment:  $19250
number of times a day that plane is used: around 10?
revenue per day:   about 200K per plane

so, by pulling the seatback phones you are saving .01 percent of the revenue you are bringing in.

Basically, if you had managed to raise the ticket price  by a one tenth of one penny, that would have been the same fuel saving.

I realize it is a competitive market, but I think an airline could raise the fare by a penny and get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.  This is just mean.</p>
<p>&#8220;In removing seatback phones from its MD-80s and B737-400s, another airline shed 200 pounds per airplane, translating into 3,400+ gallons saved annually&#8221;</p>
<p>average passenger + 1 bag = at least 200 pound<br />
3400 gallons of fuel @ 3.19 a gallon (what AA paid last Q = $10,846<br />
10.846 / 365 = $29 a day<br />
number of passengers on a MD-80 plane:  about 140?<br />
 capacity:  probably around 80%<br />
number of paying seats:  lets say 110<br />
average price of  a segment on a MD-80 medium haul ticket:  about $175<br />
what the airline pulls in on that plane per segment:  $19250<br />
number of times a day that plane is used: around 10?<br />
revenue per day:   about 200K per plane</p>
<p>so, by pulling the seatback phones you are saving .01 percent of the revenue you are bringing in.</p>
<p>Basically, if you had managed to raise the ticket price  by a one tenth of one penny, that would have been the same fuel saving.</p>
<p>I realize it is a competitive market, but I think an airline could raise the fare by a penny and get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey, airline, have you lost weight? &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinetravelreview.com/2008/07/15/what-have-airlines-removed-from-aircraft-to-save-weight/#comment-4866</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey, airline, have you lost weight? &#187; Upgrade: Travel Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/?p=2342#comment-4866</guid>
		<description>[...] what else have airlines cut to reduce weight? Jared Blank points us to an interesting synopsis of what&#8217;s been done to shrink the aeronautic waistline. Check it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what else have airlines cut to reduce weight? Jared Blank points us to an interesting synopsis of what&#8217;s been done to shrink the aeronautic waistline. Check it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tj</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinetravelreview.com/2008/07/15/what-have-airlines-removed-from-aircraft-to-save-weight/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>tj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onlinetravelreview/?p=2342#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>fair article, but tacky comments.  i would not return to that site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fair article, but tacky comments.  i would not return to that site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
