A collection of Star Alliance transatlantic routes

Posted by Seth Miller on March 7, 2013 under frequent flyer, Wandering Aramean Travel Tools | 19 Comments to Read

Seems to me that, in the interest of being able to more easily find awards, having a listing of all the long-haul routes, by alliance and region, would be useful. And I haven’t ever found a good collection of them so I decided to start building one. Shocking, right??

I’m sure you’ll also be shocked to learn that I started with Star Alliance and the transatlantic (TATL) routes. I’m defining TATL in this context as between North America and Europe. I know there are more flights than just these but I’m going to have a series of posts in the coming days breaking it down and adding to the collection. And I had to start somewhere. So here it is.

There are, by my count, 172 173 route/carrier combinations across the North Atlantic Ocean operated by  one of the thirteen Star Alliance members with at least one flight in the regions. Some are seasonal but, if you’re looking for seats, this is probably a good place to start.

Putting them all on a single map is actually pretty useless, other than just to show how massive the coverage footprint is:

To make it slightly more useful here’s a collection of maps split up by carrier. Still sortof sloppy in some cases, but better.

Air Canada

Lufthansa

Air New Zealand, Austrian, LOT

Singapore Air, TAP Air Portugal, Turkish Airlines, Brussels Airlines

US Airways

United Airlines

Swiss, SAS

And, if you prefer the data in a less graphical format, it is also available in a table format here.

If you can see any I’ve missed let me know and I’ll update the tables.

Unique North American Gateways:

  • ATL
  • BOS
  • CLT
  • DEN
  • DFW
  • DTW
  • EWR
  • IAD
  • IAH
  • JFK
  • LAX
  • LAX
  • MCO
  • MEX
  • MIA
  • ORD
  • PHL
  • SEA
  • SFO
  • YEG
  • YHZ
  • YOW
  • YUL
  • YVR
  • YYC
  • YYT
  • YYZ

Unique European Gateways:

  • AMS
  • ARN
  • ATH
  • BCN
  • BFS
  • BRU
  • CDG
  • CPH
  • DME
  • DUB
  • DUS
  • EDI
  • FCO
  • FRA
  • GLA
  • GVA
  • HAM
  • IST
  • LGW
  • LHR
  • LIS
  • MAD
  • MAN
  • MUC
  • MXP
  • OPO
  • OSL
  • SNN
  • STR
  • TXL
  • VCE
  • VIE
  • WAW
  • ZRH

How far can a Dreamliner go with a 60 minute leash?

Posted by Seth Miller on March 6, 2013 under Flying, News | 11 Comments to Read

Among the many rumors circulating about the return of Boeing‘s 787 Dreamliner to the skies is one which involves the suspension of the ETOPS rating on the plane pending a significant number of flight hours to validate the proposed fixes. The plane entered service with certification to fly a long way from diversion airports; with the GE engines the rating was 330 minutes, more than 5 hours. And while the engines may still operate safely for that long there are concerns about the batteries and just how far from a diversion airport the planes should stray. Without any special ETOPS ratings the limit would be 60 minutes, roughly 400 nautical miles. That limits a lot of routes including many which the 787 was already flying or slated to operate. Here’s a map of (most of) the announced 787 routes showing 60 minute ETOPS blackout zones:

What is most surprising to me is actually how many of the routes DO work, even with this limitation in place. Service between North and South America has a couple small no-go zones but many routes would actually work pretty well. And any deviation from the optimal routings wouldn’t be too significant distance-wise. Between North America and Europe there is a path which allows for 60 minute ETOPS travel, crossing over the southern tip of Greenland as part of the trip. The route is already commonly used, especially eastbound to take advantage of the jetstream, though westbound traffic uses it less often. LOT’s Warsaw-Chicago route could make a go of it with minimal adjustments.

United Airlines‘ planned Denver-Tokyo route doesn’t quite work perfectly, but the diversion required to make it happen isn’t all that bad; Los Angeles to Tokyo would not work so well. And the east-bound versions of these flights typically fly much further south to take advantage of the prevailing winds.

Similarly, Qatar’s planned Europe service would be OK with minor deviations, as would Air India’s.

And most of the Asia service being run by JAL and ANA would be permissible. There are a few routes which will just not work. Houston-Lagos and Santiago-Madrid have chunks of the routes which won’t allow for easy adjustments to meet the non-ETOPS rules.

But, despite my concerns when I started reading about this last night, it seems that the 60 minute limit could actually still fly, so to speak.

No doubt that these “alternate” routes will affect the efficiency of the flights and will take away from the ability to realize the lower operating costs and other benefits that the 787 was supposed to bring to the airlines. That said, having the planes in the air is better than having them grounded. And if the rumored 250,000 hours of no-incident flying to regain ETOPS certification is true then these slightly longer routes might actually help get things back to normal sooner than not.

Assuming the batteries cooperate, of course.

United’s response to the premium cabin earning rates changes: better than I expected

Posted by Seth Miller on January 3, 2013 under frequent flyer, points | 12 Comments to Read

Well, the bad news is that United Airlines has confirmed the new earning rates for premium cabin fares on many partner airlines. In posts today on FlyerTalk and MilePoint the company offered up an explanation and a full listing of the affected fare classes (which pretty much matches the list I had produced) and also an explanation. Apparently the old rates were a mistake:

In March 2012, when we migrated to a single system, we unintentionally increased PQM and PQS earnings for some of our partners to our former OnePass levels, instead of taking them to their intended MileagePlus levels.

While these higher earning levels remained in effect for the remainder of 2012, we are now reinstating the PQM/PQS earning rates for the following carriers and fare classes to 100% as of Jan. 1, 2013:

  • Air New Zealand (NZ): A, B, C, D, E, J, O, U,Y, Z
  • Asiana (OZ): A, B, C, D, F, J, Y, Z
  • Croatia Airlines (OU): A, B, C, D, F, Y, Z
  • Egyptair (MS): A, B, C, D, F, J, Y, Z
  • LOT (LO): A, C, D, P, Z
  • Singapore (SQ): A, C, D, F, J, P, R, S, Y, Z
  • South African (SA): B, C, D, H, J, K, M, Q, S, Y, Z
  • TAM (JJ): A, B, C, D, F, J , Y, Z
  • TAP (TP): B, C, D, J, Y, Z
  • THAI (TG): A, B, C, D, F, J, P, U, Y, Z
  • Turkish (TK): C, D

I’m not entirely sure I buy that it was a mistake, particularly given how often they changed things around right when the initial announcement was made for the new program. Still, in a rather unprecedented move, the company has agreed to honor previously ticketed flights at the old earning rates:

We realize that some of you booked flights on these partners prior to Jan. 1 and were expecting the higher PQM/PQS earnings. In this particular case, given the circumstances, we will honor the higher rates regardless of your travel date. There are a few complexities involved with posting miles at the higher rates, so please bear with us. Specifically, if you booked your ticket through United, we will proactively adjust amounts after their initial posting (typically within a few days of when the original flight is credited). However, if you booked through someone other than United (like another airline or travel agency), you will have to contact the MileagePlus Service Center after your miles have initially posted in order to make the adjustment.

This will actually net me a few extra miles on my upcoming Bangkok-Haneda flight on Thai Airways so I’m pretty happy about that.

Related Posts:

United guts premium fare earning rates on multiple partners

Posted by Seth Miller on January 2, 2013 under frequent flyer, points, Wandering Aramean Travel Tools | 24 Comments to Read

What I originally thought was just a “fixing” of an obviously overly generous set of elite status earning rules from United Airlines‘ MileagePlus program on partner South African Airways appears now to be a massive change in earning rates for the new year. More than 70 different fare classes across at least 9 partners are affected by these changes. And in every case it is the premium fares – first, business, premium economy and full-fare economy – which are seeing the elite earning rates cut. When the new rules came out for MileagePlus in 2012 there was a rather generous upgrade in earning rates for premium cabins on many partners. Apparently United has decided they were being too generous and they’ve now cut back significantly.

In addition to the previously identified cuts for South African noted here the following fare classes now all earn only 100% of the miles flown towards elite qualification, down generally from 150%:

  • Thai Airways: J, P, U, Y, Z, A, B, C, D,F
  • Singapore Air: R, S, Y, Z, A, C, D, F, J, P
  • TAP Air Portugal:  B, C, D, J, Y, Z
  • TAM: A, C, D, F, J , Y, Z
  • LOT: A, B, C, D, P, Y, Z
  • Croatia Airlines: A, B, C, D, F, Y, Z
  • Air New Zealand: A, B, C, D, E, J, O, U,Y, Z (now showing only 100% again)
  • EgyptAir: A, B, C, D, F, J, Y, Z
  • South African Airways: J, C, D, Z, Y, B, M, H K, S, Q

These changes came without notification from the carrier, either through traditional means or through the online communities they have employees participating in. Quite unfortunate at many levels.

UPDATE:

Also add in:

  • Avianca: C, D, J
  • Asiana: A, B, C, D, F, J, Y, Z