Monthly Archive for August, 2009

Iberia Posts Second Quarter Loss

Iberia recently released its second quarter results, and reported a €72.8 million loss, which compares to a €21.2 million profit during the same period last year.

aug31_2

One major issue for airlines worldwide has been adapting capacity – and Iberia seems to be doing a decent job of this, as it cut ASKs more than RPKs, resulting in a gain in load factor by 1.5 points. The airline says that “further capacity reductions are planned, amounting to 6 per cent for the year, beyond the previous target of 4.3 per cent.”

Iberia has already trimmed its fleet, and ended the second quarter with 15 aircraft less than it did at the same time last eyar. More steps on the fleet side are being taken, as Iberia reports that ”three more short and medium-haul aircraft are to be grounded, adding to the five already withdrawn from service, while delivery of a new long-haul Airbus A-340/600 has been postponed.” Iberia is also making its current fleet fly more often as utilization, is up 4.4% to 10.5 block hours per day.

Operating revenues per ASK were down 16.5%, though operating expense was also down, by 6.7%. One area that is especially weak is cargo, with revenues down 34.6% paired with a 15.7 point decline in load factor.

There will be further labor pain as well, as the airline says there will be “new staff cuts, additional to the 4.7 per cent reduction in the second quarter.”

I’m very excited to watch what happens in the Spanish market in the future. In the past few years, a couple of new LCCs have entered – Clickair and Vueling. Iberia had a 20% stake in the former. These two airlines have merged under the Vueling name. (On a side note, it is sad to see the Clickair livery to go away, which I think is one of the nicest around.) Iberia now owns 45.85% of Vueling, and the parent company of Air Nostrum, which does regional flying for Iberia, owns 4.15%. So, now Iberia has a major stake in one of its competitors. Interesting! :D

Photo credit:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/spotterjohnson/ / CC BY 2.0

NBTA: Virgin Blue’s (Now) Hypocritical Business Cards

The Virgin booth at the NBTA conference was one of my favorites (more on that later), but I noticed something interesting on the back of a Virgin Blue business card that I received – the Boeing logo and “if it ain’t a Boeing, I ain’t going.”

aug31

I found this pretty interesting, considering that the airline operates both the E-170 and E-190. I’ve been told by Virgin Blue, however, that these are the old business cards.

I know – I notice completely random things. :P

JetBlue and Lufthansa Plan to Codeshare

The Financial Times reports this evening:

Lufthansa plans to seek regulatory approval to form a “code-share” agreement with JetBlue Airways, marking the German airline’s latest effort to forge closer ties to the US carrier and its coveted New York hub.

I can’t say the news is entirely shocking, especially since Lufthansa has acquired a significant portion of JetBlue shares – the carrier currently owns 19% of JetBlue, though if Lufthansa wanted to increase its stake it would be limited  by foreign ownership rules.

If this codeshare deal happens, it would be a big step for JetBlue. Currently, the airline only has an international partnership (not a codeshare) with Aer Lingus.

The biggest issue here, I think, is Continental. (I am a bit surprised that the Financial Times report didn’t mention them.) One of the reasons Continental is such a good fit for Star Alliance is that the group is very weak in New York – the best it has is US Airways’ domestic hub at LaGuardia, and if the slot swap with Delta goes through that goes away. Continental’s Newark hub gives Star a wide range of domestic, and more importantly, international flights out of the city.

Granted, Lufthansa has a greater presence at JFK than it does at EWR at the moment, but I’m sure Continental was at least hoping that it would get some connecting passengers from Lufthansa to hop on to domestic flights from EWR, not go to JetBlue’s network out of JFK.

It should also be noted, though the article rightly focuses on JFK, there would probably be some opportunities out of JetBlue’s Boston operation as well.

On another note, does this have the potential to mix up the relationship with United? Is there any chance that this could bring away some passengers who connect in IAD up to JFK? Or am I now just making random guesses? :D

And to take it even further – might we see Star Alliance stickers on JetBlue aircraft? Unlikely in the near-term, but who knows, maybe one day? (Taking it too far here? :D )

Regardless, interesting move here. Looking forward to seeing what happens.

Sunday Video #37

I always love how Virgin makes some kind of sexual reference in so many things. :P (Their slogan at NBTA was “ride us all the way.”)

YouTube Preview Image

Saturday Links #57

  1. Boeing made a 787 announcement this week, so, of course, Jon Ostrower has an excellent write-up.
  2. Ben has started his latest trip report. If past reports are any indication, it’ll be great!
  3. Flight has an update on the CSeries.
  4. V Australia lost money in its first few months of existence – not really surprising.
  5. Air Berlin is mulling a cancellation of its 787 orders.
  6. Will production resume on the Eclipse 500? Perhaps.

Awkward Moment?

From my trip this week, at Midway on Sunday:

aug28

“I’m sorry we couldn’t be together, it wasn’t you, it was me.
We can still hang out, right?”

Virgin America’s Second Quarter Results Show Improvement

Virgin Ameirca, like everyone else, has to file financial results with the DOT, and lately they’ve been giving a preview before the DOT releases them (which will be later in September). It looks like the airline is now making solid progress.

Operating income improved 81.6% year-over-year to a loss of $11.4 million, and net income improved similarly by 75.5%. The statistic that stood out for me was operating margin (operating income divided by revenue), which was up 58.7 points to -8.4%. RASM was essentially flat – down 0.6% – which is pretty good considering the environment we’re in.

On the cost side, CASM was down 35.6% year-over-year, but fuel was very high at this time last year, and Virgin was dealing with startup costs. CASM ex-fuel was down 20.9%.

One concern that remains is the airline’s cash position, which is $10 million lower than the end of the first quarter, at $28 million.

Another interesting statistic: “Take rates for the Gogo In-Flight Internet Service continue to climb with some flights and routes reporting up to 20-25% of guests using the service.” That’s a good number of passengers – how much money Virgin is getting is another question. When I asked Gogo about how much revenue airlines receive at NBTA, they wouldn’t tell me.

But, this is good progress for the airline, methinks. I’ll probably take a closer look once the DOT releases all the numbers in a few weeks.

Revisiting Alaska’s July Revenue Numbers

Earlier this week, I had already discussed Alaska’s July numbers, but I realized I could analyze those a bit more. The airline noted that PRASM (passenger revenue per available seat mile) and RASM (revenue per available seat mile) were affected positively by the first bag fee, and the company estimates it earned $4.9 million from that in July. Meanwhile, Alaska estimates that a new agreement on the company’s Mileage Plan card will give the company an extra $2.5 million each month for the rest of this year.

These items, obviously, give the numbers a bit of a boost, so I decided to play around with them to remove that extra revenue. For RASM, I got 12.72 cents, and I calculated 11.64 cents for PRASM (compared to 13.07 and 11.87 cents, respectively). Comparing my numbers to last years’, I found a 1.99% decrease in RASM and a 3.25% decrease in PRASM (compared to a 0.7% increase and a 1.3% decrease).

Obviously, the removal of those other revenue make the comparisons to last year look a bit worse. Nevertheless, the decreases I calculated are still superior to the double-digit declines that some other carriers have reported.

New Fees From Continental, US Airways

Yesterday Continental and US Airways announced some new fees. This was the day after the airline CEO panel at the NBTA conference. Apparently, last year Delta chief Richard Anderson said at the same panel that Delta wouldn’t be changing its bag policy, and soon after, it did. This year, Continental’s CEO Larry Kellner was a speakers, and now that airline’s policy changed the day after. Hm, maybe its cursed? :D

Continental is launching a second bag fee of $50 for transatlantic flights, which beins on tickets booked today and beyond for travel on or after September 15th. This fee is in line with previous moves by American and Delta. There will be a $5 discount for pre-paying online.

At least US Airways was frank when it announced its new fees, as its press release was titled: “US Airways Matches Competitors’ Bag Fees.” The bag fees for domestic travel are now $20 and $30 for the first and second bags, respectively. US Airways, too, is adding a $50 second bag fee for transatlantic travel. The airline will continue to charge $5 extra for checking the bag at the airport as a way “to encourage customers to continue choosing self-service tools.”

Never fun to see more of these. My question – some have said that Southwest’s no-fees approach isn’t enough to bring new passengers onboard to compensate for the loss in ancillary revnue. Will the higher fees convince more people to  fly Southwest? Or does it just mean that the airline is leaving more money on the table? There was a very good discussion about fees at the CEO panel, and I’ll have more on that later on.

JetBlue and Airtran to Expand Caribbean Offerings

I love the way airline announcements conveniently seem to go out together. For example, both JetBlue and AirTran announced some new Caribbean service yesterday, and, surprise surprise, they’ll be competing on some routes.

JetBlue’s announcement focused on Montego Bay service. The flight from JFK will get some extra frequencies, Orlando will get a daily nonstop, and Boston will get a Saturday-only service. US Airways has been on that Boston route on a seasonal basis, and the flight just ended on the 15th.

AirTran’s announcement was a bit more exciting, at least in terms of destinations, as it intends to launch service to Aruba, Montego Bay, and Nassau. Atlanta, Baltimore, and Orlando will all receive flights to the new cities, but only Atlanta and Orlando will get Aruba flights.

In Baltimore, AirTran will be all by itself on the Nassau route but will compete with Air Jamaica to Montego Bay. The airline will face competition with Delta on all the Delta flights. In Orlando, there’s currently no competition to Aruba, but AirTran will be up agaist JetBlue and Bahamasair to Nassau, and JetBlue and Air Jamaica to Montego Bay. It should be noted, however, that AirTran did not release any specific details about the routes in terms of scheduling.

It’ll be interesting to see how AirTran’s new service works out, especially where it competes with Delta.

Annoying Airline Reporting #6

Greetings, again, from San Diego. It’s about 4 AM here and I’ll be heading to the airport shortly. There was a bunch of cool stuff at NBTA, and I’ll have plenty of things to talk about.

But, today, I have yet some more annoying reporting that I heard behind me in the press room yesterday, where someone was interviewing a representative of Virgin Atlantic. The interviewer inquired about future growth, and the representative mentioned that Virgin has both A330s and 787s on order, which will enable them to expand.

Where does this one get annoying?

Next, the interviewer asked, “You have orders for the Dreamliner too, right?”

Ugh. :D