Archive for the 'JetBlue' Category

Looking at January Revenue Estimates

Quick post today – for one, I’ve been traveling. Second, my main laptop’s battery is broken, so I’m writing with an Asus Eee netbook. It’s a cool little thing, don’t get me wrong, but typing for awhile can be a hassle.

Anyway, here are the PRASM estimates from the carriers who provide them:

And, as always, here’s a graph of Continental’s results, as they provide a final number for the month prior:

So, for each carrier we saw an improvement from the month prior – and that’s great. Of course, Southwest’s results stand out a bit with the double-digit increase, and I think that’s mainly driven by an increase in load factor by over 9 points for the airline. During the airline’s earnings all CFO Laura Wright said that comparisons might get harder as capacity will be down less in future months than in January. But, at the same time, as we move forward, the 2009 numbers that will be used for comparisons for all cariers will be getting progressiviely worse, which can only help the numbers.

On a side note, I wonder how the cutover to Sabre affected JetBlue’s numbers. By all accounts, it went just wonderfully, but during the weekend of the transition load factors were capped at 40-60% on some flights, so that coud’ve had a bit of an effect.



December Revenue Estimates

The carriers that usually report monthly PRASM estimates have done so, and below is a summary of the results. Overall, they’re pretty good, especially when one considers that the comparisons for US Airways, Southwest, and JetBlue were less favorable in December than November.

jan81

Southwest came out with the biggest increase at 7%, and I have to think that a good chunk of that improvement is coming from the carrier’s efforts to optimize its schedule and shift capacity, as Southwest saw the biggest increase in load factor of the four carriers – a 6.5 point increase to 76.2%. Plus, Southwest has not been adding cities with new planes – they’ve cut routes that don’t perform all that well, and that capacity can be shifted into new stations like LaGuardia and Boston.

Since Continental revises its monthly estimates with final numbers, here is a graph of those results:

jan8_2

So, we are absolutely seeing some strong improvements here, and comparisons should turn positive as revenues improve, but also because they will be off 2009’s simply horrendous numbers. But nevertheless, progress is good.

Vote for JetBlue’s New Tail Design!

A few months ago, JetBlue unveiled a new tail design, “Blueberries,” as well as larger billboard titles on its aircraft. Now a new design is in the works for the airline’s 10th anniversary – and passengers get to decide! One gets to choose between five tails, all of which were designed by JetBlue employees, which I think is a great move by the company.

dec30

Personally, I like the one in the middle, “retro-ringlets,” the most as it adds a new color (orange) never seen before on a JetBlue tail. It would be a good move to change things up a bit for a big event like this one.

You can cast your vote here.

Looking at November Revenue Estimates

Well, it’s the beginning of the month, and that means we can now look over the results of the four airlines that provide PRASM estimates: Continental, JetBlue, Southwest, and US Airways. The good news is that all of the airlines mad progress compared to last month. The bad news is that there’s still more progress to be made. Here are the results:

dec7

This month’s results were probably boosted by Thanksgiving – last year, the holiday fell later in the month, making some traffic go into December. It did fall a bit earlier this year, though, which boosts this month’s comparison. Southwest’s impressive 12% increase was also aided by the fact that the PRASM increase in November 2008 was only 1%, providing for an easier comparison here.

Since Continental actually gives revised final numbers, here’s a graph of their performance the past few months:

dec7_2

So, progress is being made here.

Looking at October PRASM Estimates

There are four airlines that come out with monthly PRASM estimates at the beginning of every month, and here are the latest results. They look pretty good – the declines for Continental and US Airways were better than in the past. Southwest and JetBlue’s results were a bit worse, but both of those airlines had strong performance in October 2008.

nov10

Comparisons for this quarter will be a bit tricky, though. For example, Southwest CFO Laura Wright said during the company’s most recent earnings call:

“…last October we were actually up 14% on a unit revenue basis. November was up 1% and December was up 12%. There’s some weird things going on with the holidays, as you are probably aware. Last year Thanksgiving was very late in the month of November with a lot of the return travel in December, so when you look at November and December this year, I think the December comp will be more difficult just because of the holiday mismatch….So I think December is going to be a more difficult comparison and certainly October is a tougher one because of the great results we had a year ago.”

I’d still expect, though that we’ll continue to see better numbers in the coming months as things improve (hopefully) and as more comparisons are made off the crummy numbers of a year ago.

JetBlue Boosts Boston-Baltimore

Last week, Southwest said it would increase its daily service to Baltimore from five to seven flights a day. Now, JetBlue will be adding a fifth flight to the route, which it has been flying since September.

oct20

Could this move be a response to Southwest? Well, the press release certainly makes it sound that way!

“Customers in Baltimore have discovered what those in Boston have known for years: JetBlue offers more than just an unassigned seat and a handful of peanuts to their destination,” said Scott Laurence, vice president of network planning for JetBlue Airways.

The move seems to make sense from a scheduling perspective, as it appears that the aircraft flying the new flights would have just been sitting overnight in Boston anyway – the new BOS-BWI flight is the last of the day, and the new BWI-BOS flight is the first departure of the day. The route will continue to be operated exclusively by E190 aircraft.

Unfortunately, JetBlue only started the route in September so one cannot see how loads have been thus far. But clearly JetBlue has been protective of its hub now that Southwest has entered. Boston, however, remains to be Southwest’s smallest city in New England, though if a couple of more flights are added it will pass Hartford.

So now AirTran will have nine frequencies, Southwest seven, and JetBlue five. I can understand why Delta just decided to abandon this route! :D

Photo credit:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/erussell1984/ / CC BY 2.0

New JetBlue Livery – Not a Huge Change

Update 10:53 PM: Well, the aircraft has been unveiled. You can see some pictures here.

Well, the A320 still has tarps on it, but I think it’s pretty obvious what’s going on here:

oct13

Many thanks to Mario Rodriguez over at NYCAviation for giving me permission to use his photo. You can see the original thread here.

It looks like JetBlue is making the fuselage titles bigger, which is a huge improvement, I think. In addition, it appears that we will be seeing another tail design.

So, not too exciting, but JetBlue is making a positive change here. I’m glad they’re introducing some changes for their 10th birthday!

New JetBlue Livery Coming Tomorrow?

Over the weekend I’ve heard rumblings (and now it’s hit airliners.net) that JetBlue will be unveiling a new livery tomorrow in Orlando. But, that’s just about all we know at this point. From what I’ve heard, though, it appears that a new fuselage design will come out as well as an additional tail. (If that’s the case, I’m glad the different tails are staying.)

oct12_2

I’m glad JetBlue will be changing things up. There’s nothing particularly bad about the JetBlue livery (though I think the fuselage titles are too small), but there’s just too much eurowhite out there these days. To be honest, JetBlue, United, US Airways, Delta, and Continental all look a bit too similar.

Anyway, I’m looking forward to tomorrow. :D

Photo credit:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kathika/ / CC BY-SA 2.0

Are PRASM Improvements a Sign of Recovery?

Well, it’s the beginning of the month, so that means August traffic results! A few airlines give revenue estimates, and on a PRASM basis, things are basically flat, or improving slightly:

sep4

It should all of these numbers of estimates provided by the carriers, except the June and July numbers for Continental, as it provides final numbers the month after the estimate.

But does PRASM (passenger revenue per available seat mile) really give us an indication of improving revenues? Yes and no, as while PRASM can certainly go up when revenues increase, it can also go up as load factor increases, as one way to calculate PRASM is multiplying yield by load factor.

sep4_2

(Click to enlarge)

I think that it’s safe to say here that adjustments in capacity helped boost PRASM so that it’s decrease was less than that in yield (passenger revenue per RPM). Note how that in the second quarter of this year, the decrease in RPMs was less than the decrease in ASMs, yielding a higher load factor. And there are two ways to increase load factor – increase passengers, or decrease capacity. Airlines across the industry have been increasing load factors with the latter.

So, in this case, an improvement in the decline in PRASM shows that Continental is doing a better job of handling capacity, but revenues in terms of yield still aren’t doing too hot. I think if we see an improvement in yields (and previous data shows that we could be hitting bottom), then it would be a good time to say that revenues are truly improving.

There will be more data coming soon that should shine more light on the revenue side of things. Later this month the ATA will release its monthly yield data, and in roughly a month’s time third quarter results will start coming in.

More Thoughts on the JetBLue/Lufthansa Codeshare

The proposed codeshare agreement between JetBlue and Lufthansa, while not entirely surprising, is certainly a very interesting story, and after looking to it more there are a few things to look at. The airlines, according to a DOT filing, “plan to initiate the proposed code-share services on the routes listed in Exhibit 1 on or about October 8, 2009.”

First, the routes. There will be transfers going on at both Boston and New York (JFK).

From Boston:

  • Tampa (TPA)
  • Ft. Myers (RSW)
  • San Juan (SJU)
  • West Palm Beach, (PBI)
  • Buffalo (BUF)

From New York:

  • Ft. Lauderdale (FLL)
  • Tampa (TPA)
  • New Orleans (MSY)
  • Austin (AUS)
  • Raleigh/Durham (RDU)
  • San Juan (SJU)
  • Pittsburgh (PIT)
  • Buffalo (BUF)
  • Syracuse (SYR)
  • Rochester (ROC)

It should be noted that Continental has service to all of these cities, and United serves all of them except West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale.

Next, as I mentioned earlier, what do Lufthansa’s Star partners think? Surely Continental and United aren’t exactly pleased at the loss of potential passengers going to their domestic routes from Lufthansa flights. This issue certainly gets messier as Continental, Lufthansa, and United are part of the “Atlantic Plus-Plus” venture, part of which includes revenue sharing on transatlantic routes. (Air Canada is a member as well, and US Airways does not have anti-trust immunity with its fellow Star carriers.)

Continental and United did not respond to requests for comment on this issue.

Also – what does Delta think about this? A news report mentioned that Delta complained about Lufthansa’s investment in JetBlue a few months ago. I found the filing, which was concerning Continental’s application to join Star. Delta wrote:

JetBlue and Continental both have substantial operations in New York and compete on 38 nonstop routes. The potential for competitive mischief (whether intentional or unintentional) in a situation in which Lufthansa has access to the competitively sensitive information of United and Continental, as well as JetBlue, is a circumstance that was not foreseen or reviewed in connection with the previously-approved JetBlue investment transaction.

Has Delta’s opinion changed at all? Probably not. Delta did not reply to a request for comment. American and oneworld probably aren’t the most pleased, either.

Anyway, this is a big step for JetBlue, but I think if the DOT approves the codeshare application, this could provide many benefits for the airline.

JetBlue and Lufthansa Plan to Codeshare

The Financial Times reports this evening:

Lufthansa plans to seek regulatory approval to form a “code-share” agreement with JetBlue Airways, marking the German airline’s latest effort to forge closer ties to the US carrier and its coveted New York hub.

I can’t say the news is entirely shocking, especially since Lufthansa has acquired a significant portion of JetBlue shares – the carrier currently owns 19% of JetBlue, though if Lufthansa wanted to increase its stake it would be limited  by foreign ownership rules.

If this codeshare deal happens, it would be a big step for JetBlue. Currently, the airline only has an international partnership (not a codeshare) with Aer Lingus.

The biggest issue here, I think, is Continental. (I am a bit surprised that the Financial Times report didn’t mention them.) One of the reasons Continental is such a good fit for Star Alliance is that the group is very weak in New York – the best it has is US Airways’ domestic hub at LaGuardia, and if the slot swap with Delta goes through that goes away. Continental’s Newark hub gives Star a wide range of domestic, and more importantly, international flights out of the city.

Granted, Lufthansa has a greater presence at JFK than it does at EWR at the moment, but I’m sure Continental was at least hoping that it would get some connecting passengers from Lufthansa to hop on to domestic flights from EWR, not go to JetBlue’s network out of JFK.

It should also be noted, though the article rightly focuses on JFK, there would probably be some opportunities out of JetBlue’s Boston operation as well.

On another note, does this have the potential to mix up the relationship with United? Is there any chance that this could bring away some passengers who connect in IAD up to JFK? Or am I now just making random guesses? :D

And to take it even further – might we see Star Alliance stickers on JetBlue aircraft? Unlikely in the near-term, but who knows, maybe one day? (Taking it too far here? :D )

Regardless, interesting move here. Looking forward to seeing what happens.