Archive for the 'Virgin America' CategoryPage 2 of 6

A Quick Look at Some Virgin America Financials

I’ve been spending some time over the past couple of weeks with some Virgin America financials – specifically its latest (Q4 2010) balance sheet with the DOT.

Here’s an interesting data point – the value of the carrier’s owned aircraft at the end of 2010 was roughly $40.9 million. That’s down over $60 million than at the end of the third quarter of 2010, and only about $2.1 million higher than the third quarter of 2007, when Virgin began operating.

The latest decrease in this line item appears to be driven by sale-leaseback transactions. According to the carrier’s fourth quarter 2010 cash flow statement, Virgin generated about $59.5 million through sale-leasebacks during the quarter. During the same time period, Virgin saw negative cash flow $55.5 million to pay off notes and also received $35.2 million through the issuance of new debt.

A similar decline in the flight equipment line occurred during the fourth quarter of 2009, according to DOT balance sheet data, though Virgin’s cash flow statement doesn’t mention any sale-leasebacks during that time period.

Other interesting balance sheet data point — Virgin’s purchase commitments (an asset on the balance sheet) were listed at $38.3 at the end of 2010, up from $18.3 million at the end of the third quarter. If I had to make a guess, I would say the increase could have been driven by the carrier’s 60-strong A320 order, which was finalized at the end of December.

Hopefully more on these topics soon – unfortunately the DOT’s release of first quarter financial data is many weeks behind schedule, though supposedly second quarter numbers are still due next month.

 

A Quick Look at Virgin America’s Dallas Load Factors

Last week the DOT released March traffic data, and I figured it’d be worth doing a quick check of Virgin’s load factors at DFW:

Virgin’s loads were pretty weak at the beginning, but the trend is good. The increases seen in March are probably due to Virgin becoming a bit more established along with seasonality. And any sale activity (remember the Groupon deal?) by Virgin may have helped as well.

Which brings me to my next point – we have no idea what fares people were buying until the first quarter DB1B data comes out in a few months. (There is fourth quarter data available, but since Virgin was only in Dallas for a couple weeks of December, I don’t think it’s worth examining.)

It will be very interesting to check out the April numbers when they are released next month. Virgin added a third frequency from both LAX and SFO, so it will be interesting to see what that capacity boost did to loads.

(P.S. – Obviously JetBlue’s order is the big US news today…I hope to have some thoughts tomorrow or Thursday.)

A Few Thoughts On Virgin America’s First Quarter Results

A week ago Virgin America released its first quarter financial results. I was going to write about this on Monday, but decided to hold off and hope the DOT would release fourth quarter financial data this week so I could get some more data (Virgin doesn’t share a balance sheet in the press release, for example), but sadly that didn’t happen.

So, here are a some quick thoughts on the results….and once the DOT releases fourth (and hopefully first) quarter financial data in a couple of weeks, I hope to write a more comprehensive post on this topic. Anyway…

Overall, Virgin’s first quarter numbers weren’t exactly stellar. Its operating loss increased 36.4% year-over-year to $29.4 million, though this loss was on higher revenue, so operating margin stayed constant at -14.7%. The airline’s net loss grew by 25.5% compared to the first quarter of 2009, to $44.6 million.

Net profit margin improved slightly year-over-year, from -24.2% to -22.1%.

These numbers were a bit concerning to me, to be honest. Virign had posted some positive momentum in terms of profitability during the first three quarters of 2010, but that ended in the fourth quarter. The carrier didn’t reach its goal for having a breakeven year in terms of operating profit. I’m hoping this doesn’t turn into a trend.

Total revenue per available seat mile was up 11.6% year-over-year, though Virgin noted that in mature markets – those that have been open for nine months or more – RASM increassed 20%. So one wonders how much of a drag markets like Dallas were on earnings. Virgin said that new markets represented 19% of capacity during the quarter.

Meanwhile, cost per available seat mile also increased 11.6% – and not surprisingly fuel was responsible for much of that. But CASM ex-fuel also rose 5.3%. The company says this was “as a result of cost of idle capacity, primarily new teammates in training and new aircraft being modified to Virgin America standards.”

I think the point Virgin is trying to make here is that growth can be expensive, which is absolutely the case. According to its news release, Virgin is “growing from 28 aircraft in service in the first quarter of 2010 to a projected 52 aircraft by the second quarter of 2012.” 35 aircraft were in service at the end of the first quarter of 2011. So with over 15 more aircraft coming in the next year – how will Virgin perform during this growth phase?

Virgin also reported it has $25 million in cash. That’s $5 million less than the fourth quarter of 2010. Interesting note in this area – Virgin said it sold and leased back two A319s this past December.

As most people reading this blog know – I’m a big fan of Virgin. They have a delightful product and they also seem to have a great company culture. But eventually the business needs to become sustainable.

Fortunately – I think Virgin has some good things going for it. The carrier has a great hard product that really sets it apart from everyone else. And as it adds new markets and boosts schedules in existing ones, Virgin becomes more relevant. But the persistent issue is competition – Virgin continues to enter crowded markets dominated by legacy carriers with much more capacity (e.g. LAX-DFW, SFO-ORD), which means Virgin has very limited pricing power, obviously creating margin pressure.

So we’ll have to see how Virgin’s financial results shape up in response to its growth. I’m especially interested in how Chicago and Dallas develop – though the fact that Virgin is offering triple points on those routes dims my optimism slightly.

As mentioned earlier – these are just my quick thoughts, and I’ll hopefully have more once the DOT releases more financial data.

Virgin America Looking at an Elite Tier

When I was on Virgin America’s inaugural flight to Chicago last week, I had a chance to catch up with their CEO David Cush for about a half hour. One of the topics I was wondering about was if Virgin is looking at adding some form of an elite tier to its Elevate loyalty program.

“We’re putting a lot of thought into that, and you’ll see something on that soon,” said David.

I then asked if Virgin was considering first class upgrades to elites. He replied that “in the coming weeks, you will hear more on this, but what I will say is any elite program that we do will not include upgrades to first class. We’re very protective of our first class…we want everyone to know who buys a ticket in our first class that the person sitting next to them also bought their ticket.”

He later added that, even with no upgrades, “we’ve got some very interesting things that will come along with an elite program.”

I’m sure some might be disappointed to hear that Virgin won’t be doing upgrades to first, but it makes sense. David told me that “we have 90% load factors in first class,” so there’s not much upgrade space to give in the place. Part of that, I’m sure is that Virgin has a small cabin up front – only eight seats on both the A319 and the A320. United and US Airways have 12 first seats on their A320s, while Delta has 16.

The other reasons Virgin has a good load factor in the pointy end? First, I think they have a compelling offering. Second, I’d argue that Virgin advertises first class upgrades pretty heavily. It’s now even possible to purchase an upgrade onboard.

In the future, I should ask David a bit more about that load factor. How many are purchases of first class fares, and how many are upgrades?

Anyway, it will be interesting to see what Virgin offers here in the next few weeks.

A Few Thoughts on Flying Last Week

I was very excited for my travel last week, as I’d be flying out to San Francisco to be on Virgin America’s inaugural flight to Chicago O’Hare. The flight from Boston to San Francisco was great, as was the inaugural flight.

Unfortunately, getting home didn’t work out too well. See, Virgin offered to comp all of my flights, so I decided to try an ORD-SFO-BOS routing. Yes, it’s very much circuitous, but I figured I’d be saving some money and I would actually be productive during my flights thanks to Virgin’s power and Wi-Fi. I did something similar for Virgin’s Toronto launch last summer and it actually worked!

But seriously, next time I try to book a 30-minute connection, someone please talk some sense into me. The O’Hare departure left six minutes late, the flight ended up landing in SFO fifteen minutes late, and I ended up deplaning just as the door was closing on the Boston flight. To make matters worse, the next flight was the red-eye, which had no seats!

Since I had to be home for Friday morning, I began frantically searching for a way home. My best bet, it appeared, was a US Airways itinerary to Providence with a connection in Philadelphia that would get me in around 11:45pm that night. Fortunately, I decided to talk to a US Airways airport agent about it, who said that the SFO-PHL flight was delayed enough that I would end up missing my connection.

I continued looking around for options, and US Airways kept looking like the best one. I ended up booking an SFO-PHL-BOS itinerary. I wasn’t exactly looking forward to a red-eye in the back of an A321, but it would get me home. The flight was much more expensive than I had hoped, but I did arrive as scheduled Friday morning.

So, I’ve learned my lesson. Had I had at least an hour layover, I would’ve been fine. But in the future I shouldn’t let saving a few bucks blind myself from realities. In this case, I should have just booked a ORD/MDW-PVD flight a few weeks before my trip and have been done with it.

Nevertheless, the trip was a very interesting one. Due to the fact of my extreme sleep deprivation during the week, I’m not sure if I have enough details to write up a whole trip report. :D But I will provide a few thoughts on Virgin and US Airways, and hopefully later this week I’ll have some more on the Chicago launch and some of the interviews I did while there.

Thoughts on Flying Virgin Ameirca and US Airways Last Week

  • Virgin America gets the little touches down pat. I was impressed to see that at Boston, the station manager’s business cards were available at check-in and at the gate. That tells me two things. First, Virgin actually cares what its customers think. Second, it’s willing to empower its front-line to deal with issues rather than have everything be dealt with at headquarters.
  • Another nice touch is Virgin’s kiosks, check-in counters, and gate counters. Apparently they’re a bit lower than those at other airlines, which makes them feel a bit more accessible.
  • Little touches are nice, but they don’t matter when the important things are off. For example, I arrived for my flight back from O’Hare a bit after 5 am. The Virgin check-in desk was supposed to be staffed by then, but no one was around yet.
  • Last week I arrived into Boston very early, and got to the Virgin gate area just before the first flight to LAX was set to depart. I was surprised to see the captain walking around the gate area and introducing himself to passengers. I doubt that’s really common an any airline, but that gesture was definitely appreciated by all.
  • The “wow” factor after flying Virgin America wears off after a few flights with them. That’s not a big deal – Virgin sets a high bar and you begin to expect that. (And hopefully, in Virgin’s case, that’s why you become loyal…)
  • When I missed my connection in SFO, the Virgin America gate agent was incredibly apologetic about the whole situation. I bet many employees at other airlines wouldn’t do that.
  • One possible opportunity for service recovery at Virgin – offering up access the Virgin Atlantic clubhouse, even for a fee (the lounge is currently open to First Class, Main Cabin Select, and Elevate members for a fee). That would certainly make a stay at SFO much more enjoyable.
  • I’ve been slightly disappointed with Virgin’s cabin service with my few flights on them. On the non-inaugural flights I’ve flown, I’ve always purchased some kind of snack or meal, and I’ve been a bit disappointed with the delivery. Basically, if Southwest can always deliver free snacks with a smile, I feel Virgin could do the same with a $10+ meal.
  • That said, one of the flight attendants on my ORD-SFO flight deserves mega kudos for trying to help with my connection. When I mentioned I had a connection, she helped me find space for my bag further up on the aircraft. Unfortunately I still didn’t make the flight, but she was very generous nonetheless.
  • I was pleasantly surprised by US Airways’ service on my flights. The flight attendants were…experienced, for lack of a better term. They just did their jobs really well. On my SFO-PHL flight, the three FAs who were mainly helping out in the back (I think that’s where they were stationed, at least) worked really well together, and one was particularly helpful in helping passengers find space in the overhead bins.
  • Somehow, just somehow, I was able to sleep for most of my SFO-PHL flight. I normally can’t sleep while flying, so apparently I was quite sleep-deprived.
  • My SFO-PHL flight was packed. I’m the fact that it was Memorial Day weekend helped, but it got me thinking how much US Airways’ West Coast redeyes feed the first bank of morning departures in Philadelphia.
  • The SFO-PHL flight was operated by an A321 in the Stephen Wolf-era colors. I have some great memories with that livery, and it will be sad to see it finally go away. The dark fuselage is still quite distinctive.
  • One can really sense US Airways’ on-time performance. Both of my flights began boarding earlier than scheduled.
  • The gate agents for the SFO-PHL redeye were announcing before boarding that overhead space would be out by the time the last zone would board, and started offering free checked bags. The fact that some passengers can end up with a free checked bag while others have to pay $25 just doesn’t seem right to me. Granted, I realize the airlines need as much revenue as they can get, but still…
  • Final thought on Virgin America – they have an amazing product, but sometimes the more comprehensive schedule of a network carrier comes in handy. Granted, my issues were completely self-imposed, but I still think my point is valid.
  • And one last thought on US Airways – the airline appears to have the basics down pat. It’s been great to see the airline improve its operation, especially in-terms of on-time performance. Now, it’d be great for the airline to start improving its product a bit, but it needs to be careful here, as the company uses its cost advantage to account for a revenue disadvantage. Either way, catching up to other competitors by adding first class to RJs is a great step in the right direction.

Talking to Virgin America About…er…Everything

A few weeks ago (April 27), I had the opportunity to chat with Virgin America’s CEO, David Cush. Unfortunately, final exams happened and I got way behind on writing up this piece. Better late than never, I suppose.

In the past with executive interviews I’ve bounced between posting them or installments or going in one shot. This time I’ve selected the latter. The post below is pretty lengthy, but I think you’ll find some of the topics covered, such as hedging, growth plans, fleet moves, and distribution pretty interesting.

The interview was prompted by Virgin’s fourth quarter results, though we didn’t talk about those much. The carrier did not achieve a full-year operating profit as it had predicted in the past, though its operating and net income for 2010 improved compared to a year prior. Results for the fourth quarter, however, were slightly worse than a year prior. Virgin’s net loss for the quarter was $25.1 million, compared to $18.8 million one year ago, for example.

Anyway, on to the interview.

My first question for David was on Virgin’s fuel hedging efforts. Virgin’s earnings release mentioned that the airline had hedged for roughly half of its 2011 fuel consumption. The day before I interviewed David, Delta said when it announced its first quarter results that it would be shifting many of its hedging positions away from West Texas Intermediate to Brent crude (and heating oil), saying that it “repositioned its fuel hedge portfolio in response to the dislocation in price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil (“WTI”) to jet fuel.”

David said that Virgin has no plans for a similar move, saying that “the spread is already…pretty wide given its historical averages. Basically, if we moved into Brent now, we would be buying that spread. I certainly wish I had moved into Brent six months ago, but doing it now in our view is essentially…betting on a widening spread between WTI and Brent, and we don’t anticipate that happening, the $12-14 right now we think is about as wide as it will go.”

[Ed. Note – over the past month the spread has roughly stayed in that range.]

Photo Credit: Brandon Farris

Virgin has decided to slow its growth plans, and will be taking six fewer aircraft in 2012 and seven fewer in 2013 than originally planned. I asked David what that meant in terms of new Virgin cities. “What that probably means is two destinations fewer in 2012 and one or two in 2013,” he replied.

The decision to take on thirteen less aircraft does not, however, affect Virgin’s recent order with Airbus for 60 aircraft (30 A320s with sharklets and 30 A320neos). “We’re taking the full orderbook as scheduled from Airbus,” said David. If Virgin was planning to take on those thirteen aircraft in the 2012-2013 time period, it would have reached out to lessors.

Despite slower-than-planned fleet growth in the near-term, Virgin still aims to expand its route map during this time period. David told me it is “highly likely” will add one more destination this year, “likely in the fourth quarter” and “given the aircraft we have coming next year I would imagine we would add one or two destinations in 2012 and one or two destinations in 2013,” he added.

I was wondering what Virgin’s needs for financing in the future would be. David said that “with current fuel prices and current ticket prices, essentially the entire industry is going to be running big operating losses so that will drive some capital needs. But what we expect to happen is either fuel prices will come down or either ticket prices will come up to balance with fuel prices. Assuming we get that balance…in some reasonable amount of time…then at that point we have no additional capital needs going forward, that we’ve arraigned for the capital that we need.”

“The only capital we will end up needing, off course, is for the aircraft coming beginning in 2013,” David added.

Since David mentioned ticket prices, I decided to ask how much of Virgin’s higher fuel prices the airline as able recover. “We think we’ve captured about half of it. The unfortunate thing, of course, is given how rapidly fuel prices have gone up, only capturing half of isn’t great…we’re hopeful that if fuel prices stabilize where they are today or drop, that we’ll still see some pricing traction going forward,” he said.

Photo Credit: Adam Schofield

With that, I moved on to some individual markets. I was very interested in David’s thoughts on Dallas-Fort Worth, especially. DOT traffic data has shown that flights in January were roughly half-full. Granted, it’s a new market that’s a fortress hub, but that seemed low. David told me that DFW is “a tough market. We knew it would be going in. First quarter’s not a great quarter for DFW. What we saw was traffic growth throughout the quarter. We were quite happy with the way March turned out.” (Virgin later told me they had achieved a 71% load factor on DFW-LAX in March.) David also mentioned that Virgin had added a third frequency on both of its DFW routes in April, and that it would “take us a little while to fill the loads backup with that extra frequency.”

I then moved on to Chicago, where Virgin will launch service next week. David told me that Virgin is “quite happy with the way Chicago’s going” and that “it’s booked at about the same level as the rest of our long-haul network, which is unusual for a new market.”

As we approached the end of the interview, I asked about Virgin’s plans to codeshare with V Australia/Virgin Australia. Originally there was talk of a filing with the DOT for that partnership at the end of last year. According to David, however, the deal has been delayed because Virgin America has all “internal resources focused on a successful and uneventful transition” to Sabre, which is slated to be completed by October 2011. This upgrade will make it easier for Virgin America to participate in codeshare partnerships, and “by [the] first quarter of 2012, you’ll see us doing a number of these codeshares,” said David.

Speaking of Sabre, I chatted quickly with David about distribution and why Virgin was pursuing the upgrade earlier in its history than, say, JetBlue. “Knowing the power of distribution, that’s really motivated us to go forward with this…I know what this…can do on the revenue side,” he said.

Since David mentioned the revenue benefits, I figured I’d ask about the distribution issues going on at American, where that carrier is focusing on the costs of using the GDS system. “What they’re doing makes a lot of sense for them, what’s we’re doing makes a lot of sense for us,” said David. He proposed that if you compare the two carriers, a far greater share of Virgin’s tickets are sold by the airline directly when compared to American.

Overall, I was pleased with the interview. I wish I had focused a bit more on financial results, but fortunately I’ll have another chance to catch up with Virgin this week (hopefully).

 

Virgin America Announces Chicago Service

After years of trying, Virgin America will be able to launch service to Chicago O’Hare this spring.

The airline just announced that it will launch five daily flights to the new destination – three to San Francisco and two to Los Angeles - beginning May 25. (Earlier I speculated that it would be the other way around, but I was wrong, apparently.)

According to  Virgin’s website, it appears that all service will be operated with A320s. Here’s the schedule:

I have a couple of thoughts on this. First of all, it’s nice to see a new competitor in these markets. But, while Virgin has an absolutely delightful product, both United and American have much more convenient schedules along with large bases of frequent fliers to boot. That being said, Virgin isn’t exactly new to competing with these airlines.

After the launch of Dallas service in December, Chicago becomes Virgin’s second mid-continent, fortress-hub market. It will certainly be interesting to watch the performance of both.

Virgin America on IFEC

One of the most distinguishing features of Virgin America’s current onboard product is the airline’s Red system, which offers live television, movies, music, and more. The system is also utilized for ordering of drinks, food, and other onboard shopping.

I would argue that Virgin’s entertainment offerings are far ahead of other airlines in the domestic market, but that doesn’t mean the airline is stopping. In fact, Virgin is currently planning on launching an upgraded IFE system next year.

Virgin America CEO David Cush wouldn’t share all the specifics with me when I spoke with him last week, but he still mentioned a few very interesting features.

David said Virgin passengers will find “more entertainment options than you have today” on a “bigger, clearer screen.” He also mentioned new “interactive features” that will allow users to “interact with other guests on the aircraft as well as guests on other flights while you’re in the air.”

Virgin’s current system already has some features to allow passengers to interact with each other, like seat-to-seat chat, but interaction with people on multiple flights is new. “It may be gaming with the person who’s flying on a different airplane than you are,” said David.

Now, obviously interactive features with other aircraft would require some form of connectivity. Virgin America’s fleet is already equipped with Gogo, but I was wondering if Virgin was willing to look elsewhere. David told me that Virgin is “we’re looking…at Row 44 and the satellite providers,” but noted the airline “quite happy with Gogo right now.” He also said that Gogo is “aware that bandwidth requirements expand quite rapidly…they’re aware of that, they’re working hard on it. That having been said, we’re looking at other options in the future.”

Anyway, I’m really looking forward to seeing these changes. I find it very interesting that Virgin is looking at upgrading its system after being around for a few years, but then again Red is one of the airline’s most distinguishing features – might as well enhance a feature that differentiates them from the competition, I guess. (How many of Virgin’s passengers select them because of IFE?  I wonder.) One item I’d love to see added (in addition to what David said) is a new remote – right now the keyboard is a little tough to use. Obviously, space is limited, but I found that the keys weren’t all that responsive.

Virgin America Continues to Pursue O’Hare Service

Virgin America has been looking to launch service to Chicago O’Hare for a couple of years now. The market appears to make perfect sense for them as it’s a very large business market for both Los Angeles and San Francisco. Unfortunately for Virgin, it’s had some trouble forging a deal with the city of Chicago to get access to O’Hare.

But it appears there’s a chance things could change in the near future. Virgin America CEO David Cush told me last week that that he is hopeful that Virgin will have “something positive to announce” over the next few weeks.

“The city is working very hard on it. We are in, I would say, very intense and fruitful negotiations with the city,” said David.

He also noted that Virgin has “been clear with the city and with others that if we can solve this problem we’ll be there in May and we’ll be there with five flights a day.”

I didn’t ask David for a breakdown, but I’d reckon three of those five flights would be from Los Angeles, with the other two from San Francisco.

“It’s kind of an unusual negotiation because we’ve been clear that we will start O’Hare in the first or the second quarter. We just don’t know what year yet,” David said.

He added that Virgin is not not interested in launching service “after the summer peak” or “going into the winter period,” noting that demand to Chicago is cyclical.

Virgin America Boosts Existing Routes, But Cuts Toronto

Virgin America just announced a few network changes occurring in April…let’s take a look.

First, the airline is boosting its still-new service to Dallas-Fort Worth. The airline will add a third frequency from LAX and SFO. Here’s how the new schedule looks, with the new flights highlighted:

I like this change. Virgin America certainly has a much better product than American, but is a little weak in the schedule department, so this helps. I still think if the first LAX-DFW departure was earlier in the morning it’d be a bit more preferable for travelers looking to maximize their time in Dallas.

Some other routes are getting a boost as well. On April 6, San Francisco – Las Vegas will get an additional flight, so six roundtrips will operate during the week.

SFO-San Diego was recently cut to three roundtrips, but on April 6 the route will be restored to four flights. (For historical context, Virgin launched that route with three daily flights in 2008 but it was boosted to five a few weeks later.)

Right now SFO-Dulles is served with two daily flights, though a few times each week there’s a third in each direction. On April 28, a  daily mid-morning IAD depature is added along with a daily SFO departure in the mid-afternoon. So on some days there will be four SFO-IAD flights.

So, where is this capacity coming from? Well, Virgin is still growing its fleet, of course, but Toronto service is going away. It’s always sad to see an airline eliminate a destination, but this make sense. In July the airline’s load factor was just about 70%, and I’m guessing it hasn’t been much better this winter.

Virgin had a great product on its first international route, but its biggest competitor, Air Canada comes much closer to Virgin than other airlines in terms of hard product. I mean, Air Canada has one LAX-YYZ flight with flat-beds! Also, with only one flight each from LAX and SFO, Virgin didn’t have the greatest schedule when compared to Air Canada.

So the Toronto cut makes sense. Personally, I think one of Virgin’s weaknesses is its schedule on some routes, so one would imagine that additional frequencies should make them a stronger competitor in these existing markets.

Updated at 10:39 PM to fix my DFW schedule.