Last week the AP’s Scott Mayerowitz was tweeting for advice on booking an award stay in Paris. Getting rooms on points for his nights was a bit of a challenge, I did see options but they weren’t for the best or most convenient places that he was looking for.

I used points for my own Paris stay a few months back.

But the advice I failed to offer Scott is that there are often better value ways to get rooms than award redemptions, and that it’s worth running the traps on all of them.

I tend to see my points as currency. Some people view them as “free” and so they want t spend points to get “free rooms” rather than spending money. I won’t spend my points unless I’m getting some minimum amount of value out of them. That’s because I can more or less always turn them into cash by redeeming them for travel that I’d otherwise pay for. I can even buy points and sometimes get more out of those points than paying for a room. So there’s a minimum amount at which I’ll redeem points (certainly not for less than I would buy points at).

With Starwood points it’s probably a smidge over 2 cents apiece, with Hilton points it’s something like two-fifths of a cent, with Hyatt points it’s about a penny and a half.

If a room redemption costs 22,000 Hyatt points, but I can pay less than $330 all-in for that room, I’ll certainly come out of pocket with the cash and save the points. Fortunately, even for the priciest hotels, there’s often a way to do just that: Hyatt Stay Certificates.

Hyatt Will Sell You Stays for Less Than the Price at Hyatt.com

In the olden days I used to make Hyatt certificate stay reservations, and only buy the certificates once I was certain of my plans. The reservations themselves are cancellable. And if I still needed to cancel the stay after buying the certificate, that’s fine, I could always use the certificate on a future stay within a year.

These stays don’t earn elite credit or points, but elite status has been recognized in my experience. And the cost savings can very much be worthwhile.

The cost of many of these stay certificates are less than paying for the room outright. I used to use the Grand Hyatt all the time when it was at the Premier level, then priced at $165 all-in including tax for a room there when rates could be going in the mid-$400s or low-$500s a night. In fact I once booked two rooms for eleven nights at that rate. Those 22 room nices were obtained at nearly a 75% discount to the advance purchase price once taxes were factored. Amazing.

Sadly, Hyatt changed the booking system to require the ‘certificate code’ off of each certificate in order to book a certificate stay. They wanted to clamp down on my practice of booking the room first (ensuring that certificate stay inventory was available) before buying the certificates. Put another way, they were doing their best to avoid undercutting their own web pricing through the sale of these certificates.

Finding Availability With Hyatt Stay Certificates

Hyatt.com now lets you search for gift certificate availability right on the home page, although you still need to enter the certificate code.

Click ‘offers and gift certificates’ and a box pops out to the left. That’s where you pop in the ‘gift certificate code’.

It wasn’t that hard to figure out the certificate codes. These weren’t codes tied to each individual certificate, but rather codes tied to the type of certificate.

Still, I never published the codes here for years. But they were made ‘public’ at the beginning of the year when Lucky published them.

The price of these certificates and the basic corresponding code for each is as follows:

  • Classic ($109.00) – HSCLN1
  • Choice ($152.22) – HSCHN1
  • Premier ($188.89) – HSPRN1
  • Elite ($260.00) – HSELN1
  • Inspire ($325.55) – HSINN1
  • Exclusive ($394.44) – HSXLN1
  • Ultimate ($461.11) – HSULN1

The basic structure is (H)yatt (S)tay (TWO LETTERS TO REPRESENT THE CERTIFICATE TYPE) such as CH for Choice, PR for Premier (N)ight (#) representing the number of nights the certificate is valid for.

You can change the last number in each code to correspond with the number of nights that a certificate is valid for. Although I always used and ordered 1 night stay certificates — because they are combinable (on a five night stay use five one-night certificates, for the 2 room 11 night stay use 22 one-night certificates). They’re more flexible that way, you make a reservation and buy the certificates but if you need to cancel the reservation having one night stay certificates is more flexible for later on when you make other bookings in its place.

Using Certificates in Paris — And Other Big Cities

Hyatt shows which certificates are valid at which properties, although note that this can change at any time. (Once you lock in a reservation you’re good, but one reason I like to do that before buying the certificate is that a hotel might go up in category between the time I buy the certificate and when I make a reservation with it later).

In Paris the ‘value’ property is the Hyatt Regency Paris Etoile (admittedly not the best tourist location). In Nice check out Hyatt Regency Nice Palais de la Mediterranee which looks fantastic. Both accept ‘Choice’ certificates — just US$152.22 all-in per night, including taxes.

The Hotel du Louvre requires an Elite — $260 all-in per night — certificate. Not bad for a hotel that regularly goes for twice that.

In New York, the Andaz Wall Street will take an Elite certificate… often a good deal during the week at $260, not so good on the weekends when rates there drop to $200+tax.

The Hyatt Regency Jersey City on the Hudson — a Path train from the City with a nice view of the Manhattan Skyline — accepts Choice certificates, a good strategy for a cheap New York stay.

Assuming the stay you’re booking is more than a few days away (you need time to order and have Hyatt ship the certificates), this can be a good (albeit non-points or stay credit-earning) way to save on stays with Hyatt at some of their more expensive hotels.

And since you can reserve a stay that’s cancellable before committing to buy the certificate, it’s a strategy with very little risk. Though if you do need to cancel the stay, the certificate of course is non-refundable. You have a prepaid stay for use later.

News and notes from around the interweb:

Over the past week and a half AviancaTaca LifeMiles has made some modest mileage price increases in their award chart and increased the cash component of cash and points awards from 1.3 to about 1.5 cents per mile.

These changes were made without any advance notice (as they’ve made earlier changes to their award chart as well).

Some frequent flyers went rather ballistic on the LifeMiles Facebook page. Their social media reps were at first denying that any changes had been made.

Now, apparently, LifeMiles has sent out an email acknowledging the changes. I haven’t received it, perhaps because I subscribe in Spanish (thinking I’d get more info out of them if they don’t have to first translate to English – guess not).

Here, German frequent flyer site vielfliegertreff.de, with the aid of Google Translate:

Dear partners,

In the last week we have some adjustments to the tables of the redemption of miles for airline tickets. These changes, especially the only Star Alliance member airlines flights to and from Oceania, Africa, Asia and the Middle East operated. We have not made ​​any changes to the tables of redemption between the Americas.

Based on market conditions, these adjustments the miles up to 5,000 Miles for Economy Class Life up to 10,000 Miles Life Business Class and up to 25,000 Miles First Class Life increased required.

Given historical data, the adjustments affect less than 1% of the tickets in Life Miles redeemed.

Apart from the changes mentioned above, for the first time in more than two years, we have a minimal increase in the price of miles that are purchased when our customers flexible use payment option.

This does not affect most of the redemptions in Life Miles. The cost of purchased miles through Flexible Payment is clear in the redemption process and the tool allows our customers until needed, the number of miles that you think is correct to a maximum of 60% of the miles for redemption of a ticket . purchase

Thank you and we always have the feedback that we. Fanpage of our partners and value your preferences

I’m sure it’s more articulate in the original.

And I think it’s actually quite a reasonable note, although for most members the claim that the price of the cash component of awards hasn’t gone up in two years falls on deaf ears as the program has only been a part of the Star Alliance for 11 months.

Still, I don’t see the changes as that draconian though I certainly don’t like them. The real issue is that the changes are made with no advance notice whatsoever, and not even with contemporaneous acknowledgment.

Programs should provide reasonable notice before making changes so that members who have been saving up for awards don’t have the rug pulled out from underneath them. No program should operate like Lucy, Charlie Brown and the football.

I’d have been perfectly fine with things if they had brought these changes to the attention of members in advance.

Instead, it serves as a good illustration and reminder that programs can and do make changes whenever they wish (although in Europe sometimes that generates litigation). And it’s why I don’t like carrying huge mileage balances to save for a future time, or buying miles without a specific immediate purpose.

Uber is the on-demand car service (and in many cities, taxis too — black cars on average run about 50% more than a standard taxi).

You download an app for your iPhone or Android phone, and you can see where cars are at and even track the vehicle as it heads to your location.

They utilization down time that current drivers have, those drivers use the app to pick up extra business, and payment is all handled via either free credits you have on file with them or via your credit card. There’s no transaction at the end of the ride, you just get out of the vehicle.

Here’s the deal:

  • Gilt City is offering a free $25 credit for new Uber members. (Deals We Like‘s referral link, a thank you to her for flagging this deal – but feel free to post your own link in the comments if you’d like.)

  • Sign up for Uber. New members who are referred by an existing member start off with $10 towards their first trip (the referring member also gets $10). This is my referral link, feel free to post yours in the comments for others to use.

The Gilt City voucher may take half an hour to receive. Be sure to add the $25 credit to your account no later than August 22.

These deals should be stackable, but are for new Uber users only.

I first wrote about Uber last summer in Why Taxis Suck and What You Can Do About It. This past week I wrote about the nastygram I received from the Washington DC Taxi Commission after I was critical of their attempts to protect the incumbent taxi cartel in the city from competition.

(HT: Deals We Like)

United is offering a strong discount on purchased miles.

  • Save 20% when you buy less than 25,000 award miles
  • Save 40% when you buy 25,000 award miles or more

As always with United, you can purchase up to 100,000 award miles per calendar year per account.

With this offer you can buy miles at ~ 2.3 cents per mile, which is darned good for United miles considering what they usually ask. I’ve seen sale prices of 2 cents for American miles and a hair under 1.9 cents for US Airways miles of late, but United usually gets more even with its purchase miles promos. Which isn’t entirely unfair since MileagePlus miles for most folks offer the best redemption opportunities.

Here’s the pricing for the top amounts purchasable:

Still, I do not buy miles speculatively. You give up cash now and have to trust that award charts won’t become more expensive and that seats you want will be available.

Instead, I buy miles to top off an account towards a specific award (rather than buying enough miles outright for an award) or because I have a particular use for the miles right away.

If you fall into one of those camps, it’s better to buy miles from United during this offer than at other times.

(HT: Reader John M.)

Now that we’re past New Years Resolutions (and we’ve all broken ours), gym signups are down. Gyms need to incentivize memberships. And they’ll pay companies to get them members, including companies that will kick back miles to you (rebating a portion of their commission).

You can earn 2000 United miles for joining a gym through GlobalFit’s “MileagePlus Fitness” program.

They have offers from Anytime Fitness, Bally Total Fitness, Curves, 24 Hour Fitness, New York Sports Clubs, and more.

The site claims best pricing, better than what you get walking into the gym, but I haven’t verified this.

Hat tip goes to Notiflyer and they did verify one pricing instance:

We checked out the price for a membership with 24 Hour Fitness that earns miles and the cost was a $259 payment for an entire year plus a $39 processing fee. The rate quoted at 24hourfitness.com was $29.99 a month, so the price is cheaper through this offer but you’ll need to buy a full-year membership.

Unsurprisingly, joining online (where you’re more apt to compare prices) is cheaper, and going through what’s effectively a shopping portal to make the online purchase can earn miles.

There are generally two elements to travel insurance – cancellation coverage (you get your money back for non-refundable deposits if you have to cancel for covered reasons) and interruption coverage (the cost to get home if you have to cut the trip short for covered reasons or extra costs due to airline issues along the way). Generally one policy covers both of these things.

And if you book a trip through an online travel agency, or even possibly through your airline’s website, you’ll probably be offered travel insurance.

If you’re booking a trip through a travel agent, they will probably recommend travel insurance. But is it a good idea?

Why Do Travel Agents Recommend Trip Insurance?

There are basically three reasons why travel agents recommend trip insurance:

  1. They make money selling the insurance. The average commission for selling travel insurance is over 40% and go up from there. There’s a financial benefit to the agent who sells you insurance through a third party insurer.
  2. It protects the agent from liability. Agents fear that something will go wrong along the way during your trip, and since they advised you and set it up you’ll go after them — that it will be deemed their fault — and they’ll be out of pocket (or have to make an insurance claim themselves). If you have travel insurance, the claim may be paid by the insurer — from coverage you’ve purchased. And Just as importantly, if they advised you to get insurance and you didn’t follow their advice, how can it be their fault when you’re out of pocket?
  3. They think it’s a good idea. Despite conflicts of interest in the first two reasons, some agents still believe it’s a good idea. And for some people, in certain circumstances, it may be. Read on.

What Is Insurance For?

Traditionally insurance helps you avoid risk of loss that would be substantial to your personal circumstance. A properly run insurer diversifies risks, rather than taking on all one sort of risk, so that they aren’t financially harmed in a material way when paying out claims. An insurance company gets paid to take on risk and by taking on different kinds of risk in different places they’re able to manage that risk. And you pay them to do so — you know that a small amount of money protects you from significant loss.

There are plenty of things that are often called insurance and sold as insurance that don’t really make sense as insurance. The typical dental insurance policy can really better be thought of as ‘prepaid dental services.’ You get a couple of cleanings a year. You get some benefit for major work but the policy usually pays out only half the cost on expensive procedures, and it’s common to see benefits capped at $1500. In other words, that’s the most you’ll ever get from your policy in a year. Rather than insuring against financial ruin, the company is paid to cover your dental procedures up to a specified amount but no higher. They make money on the people who never use it. The biggest benefit to dental coverage (besides that it represents tax-free compensation) is access to negotiated, in-network rates rather than protection against financial ruin.

Similarly buying a policy that will cover you for a hotel night if your flight is cancelled, or cover the cost of replacing your underwear and swimsuit if your baggage is delayed. People do get payouts on these things, but the maximum benefit is going to be pretty limited.

So You Think Something Bad Might Happen, Is Insurance Worth it?

Much travel insurance falls within the same category of coverage as a policy to protect your cell phone or the kinds of electronics you might pick up at Best Buy. There’s a reason the sales folks are so aggressive, the company makes big money on it and the commissions are good.

But that doesn’t mean you won’t ever come out ahead. Some people do drop their phones and get covered through the policies they’ve purchased. On average the insurer makes out, not the customer, but that doesn’t mean no one gets their money’s worth. Just that most people don’t.

Still, a simple calculation might suggest it’s worthwhile. If a typical claim would be for $500, and the policy costs you $100 (over the period of time you’re paying for it, perhaps $4 a month for 25 months and ignoring time value of money), you might that you’ll come out ahead f there’s a greater than 20% likelihood that you’ll make a claim.

And it feels good to be covered. No one likes fear of loss. Plus we notice the $500 loss, we may not feel the $4 a month.

Even so the calculation isn’t so simple. You pay out your $100, and then it turns out you have a claim. It isn’t all that seamless to get paid most of the time. I made a successful claim last year when my cell phone screen cracked (after I dropped it on the sidewalk). You can read about the hoops I had to jump through to get a pay out. There was plenty of paperwork, lots of reasons to deny the claim along the way, and persistence was necessary for the policy to pay off.

There’s a cost to the time, and some measure of likelihood that a policy won’t pay, that has to be factored into the equation. In other words, there’s a discount for reliability risk and customer service risk on the part of the insurer (they make more money when they don’t pay), and even for the insurer’s stability (will they be able to pay in the event of a claim).

Understand What Isn’t Covered

Travel insurance policies are rife with exclusions — often for “pre-existing conditions” (and you get to argue with an insurer later over what those might be, especially if you buy a policy some amount of time after booking a trip where it could look like you’re doing so because you know of a potential existing problem). They also may carry exclusions related to the very sorts of reasons you want to have coverage for, such as a family member’s medical emergency rather than your own, or for an unexpected work obligation that forces you to cancel a vacation.

Policies have different sorts of covered events. If something happens that isn’t listed in the policy, typically the policy won’t pay.

Travel insurance does not mean “protection against any unfortunate circumstance that may arrive” unless the policy explicitly says so and without exclusion. Those policies will, naturally, be more expensive.

What Kind of Coverage Do You Have Already Without Buying a Policy?

Before traveling internationally, it’s a good idea to find out what kind of coverage your health insurance provides. The policy I have through work covers me abroad in a substantially similar way to how it would at home. Not every policy necessarily does, and if yours doesn’t you may want coverage for health abroad.

I also mention that one should insure against catastrophic events. If medical evacuation isn’t covered by your policy, and the cost is something that would cause financial hardship, then “MedJet Assist” or similar offerings may be for you if you’re going to travel somewhere that you won’t have access to state of the art medical care. Medical evacuation from remote locations is certainly something to consider if your standard policy won’t provide for it.

And the advice that private insurance coverage often includes coverage for travel abroad specifically applies to US residents, but may not apply to residents of many other countries. It’s very common for non-US residents to have coverage – either privately or through government insurance – that won’t fully cover them abroad.

In addition to health insurance, may sorts of trip interruption and minor expense (hotel night due to irregular operations, lost luggage) coverage often comes from premium credit cards that you may have used to make your booking. Just as my Sapphire Preferred’s purchase protection paid the cost of a new screen for my phone when I dropped it.

Like many cards, Sapphire Preferred offers:

TRIP CANCELLATION INSURANCE*
Receive reimbursement for travel due to covered cancellations and emergencies when you purchase tickets with your Chase Sapphire Preferred® card.

AUTO RENTAL COLLISION DAMAGE WAIVER*
Receive coverage at no additional cost for covered damage due to collision or theft up to the actual cash value of most rental vehicles. Remember to charge your entire rental transaction to your Chase Sapphire Preferred® card and decline the rental company’s collision damage waiver coverage.

TRAVEL ACCIDENT INSURANCE*
Receive coverage while traveling for covered common carrier accidental death or dismemberment at no extra cost when you charge your travel fare on your Chase Sapphire Preferred® credit card.

TRAVEL AND EMERGENCY SERVICES*
Get help coordinating medical, legal and travel assistance services while you’re away from home.

LOST LUGGAGE REIMBURSEMENT*
Carry-on or checked luggage is covered if lost or stolen when you purchase your common carrier ticket using your Chase Sapphire Preferred® card.

TRIP DELAY*
When a covered trip is delayed more than 12 hours due to a covered event, expenses incurred as a result of the delay, such as meals and lodging, can be reimbursed.

Lots of conditions and exclusions of course, but that’s often the nature of the beast. (One such exclusion often found in credit card-provided coverage is that booking award tickets where you pay the taxes on the card may not generate coverage. Ask, and document the response, before assuming that it will.)

Who Should Buy Travel Insurance?

Cruises often involve substantial deposits or even full payment as much as a year in advance or more. So do safaris and other similar land packages. The fact that they can be both very expensive and also booked far off into the future means that there’s both significant risk of loss (big $) and substantial time during which to incur that loss (plenty of things can happen between time of booking and time of the trip).

So for folks where the loss is big enough, where they’ll really feel it, it makes sense to insure. If it’s a once in a lifetime trip, if it represents a substantial portion of one’s income, or heaven forbid if borrowing the money to take the trip (or if paying for the trip means not paying for something else if an important life event comes along) then by all means take the coverage.

On the other hand, if the amount of money are small, or risk of changing plans isn’t that great, or especially if you’re financially able to eat the loss if something bad comes to pass, then don’t “pass on the insurance” — instead think of yourself as “self-insuring.” You’re basically paying yourself for coverage (by not paying a premium to someone else), and if a cost or loss comes to pass so be it.

You’ll feel the loss. You’ll wish you bought the coverage. Because at the time you see the deposits flushed down the toilet or the extra money coming out of your pocket during a trip delay, but you don’t see the money you saved each time you didn’t buy coverage.

But most people who can afford to take the loss, especially for small losses and especially for trips that aren’t booked especially far out, likely come out better financially overall if they don’t buy that coverage.

Rather than the adverse selection problem identified by economists, that people who are most likely to need the coverage are the ones most likely to buy it, frequently the most risk adverse consumers are the ones most likely to buy coverage. And as much as buying insurance, they’re buying the comfort of knowing they won’t be out a lot of money when unforeseen circumstances arise. They’d rather be out a medium amount of money now instead.

Should YOU Buy Travel Insurance?

You know what? I don’t buy travel insurance. I don’t sell travel insurance. And I don’t actually proactively recommend travel insurance to my award booking clients. I probably should, in case something goes wrong with their flights I don’t want them to argue that I arranged the connections or recommended the airlines and routings (usually out of what’s available…) and thus should be as responsible as the airlines for any costs incurred during irregular operations.

So… if you’re booking an award ticket through me, I highly recommend you get travel insurance. Thank you!

Still, there are five reasons why travel insurance isn’t as good a deal as many people think.

  • What company is providing the service? How reputable are they? Very few people comparison shop.
  • How good a deal is the coverage – cost versus likely payout – there’s a reason the coverage is offered, which is because it’s profitable for the firm making the offer.
  • It doesn’t protect what you think it does. There’s fine print as to what circumstances are covered (not all events you might think trigger coverage in fact trigger coverage), how much coverage is provided (whatever your out of pocket costs are vs a fixed amount per incident), and in what form it takes (cash refund vs travel credit).
  • Followup to actually get a claim paid is costly — time submitting the claim, documenting everything correctly, following up to ensure payment. Sometimes more costly than the payout itself, but almost certainly when factoring collection costs into the risk-adjusted net present value calculation of whether to purchase insurance it tilts against the purchase.
  • Insurance is something you buy against low-risk catastrophic costs you can’t absorb if they were to occur, not relatively low cost events like travel disruption (lost luggage, the need for an extra hotel night).

But if you’re going to buy coverage, and these recommendations are entirely anecdotal as I’ve caveated that I don’t buy it myself, I’ve heard very good things about both TravelGuard and InsureMyTrip.com.

Read the details of the policies you’re buying, make sure they match your needs (that you are covered for the risks you think you are covered for, don’t just assume “you’re covered against bad stuff happening), and be prepared for a claims process — paperwork, delay, and potential hassle — if you do indeed need to make a claim.

And if it’s a trip of a lifetime, real money on the line, and you’ll sleep more soundly with coverage, then by all means! Your travel agent will thank you for helping to take them off of the liability hook, and they’ll appreciate the commission.

Do you buy travel insurance? How easily has it paid out for you?

News and notes from around the interweb:

  • Tnooz carries my predictions about how online hotel booking will change in the near future.
  • Frugal Travel Lawyer tells you how to get free Godiva chocolate every month.

  • A stewardess for Nigerian airline Arik Air was arrested after she was found with six kilos of cocaine at Heathrow. The drugs were discovered “on a bus which had been used to transport air crew following a flight from Lagos.” If it had been a smaller amount of blow I’d have considered it a reasonable defense that one needs mind-altering substances to deal with busing around Heathrow’s underbelly. (HT: uggboy on Milepoint)

  • One Mile at a Time writes that the cash portion of AviancaTaca LifeMiles cash and points awards seems to have gotten more expensive. Whereas it used to be 1.3 cents per mile, it now appears to run at between 1.4 and 1.6 cents per mile. The price increase appeared without any advance notice, but these awards still represent a darned good deal.

On Tuesday I announced a giveaway offer of a bunch of cool stuff from National Car Rental. You still have a day to enter.

And since I don’t take anything myself when I do those, I have two of National’s “Summer On-The-Go” Prize Packs:


  • Package one: Apple iPod Touch, $250 AMEX Gift Card, National-branded swag
  • Package two: Apple iPod Touch, $50 iTunes Gift Card, National-branded swag

I’ve gotten a couple of questions about what the National-branded swag is.

  • National Golf Umbrella
  • National Ultimate Privacy Luggage Tag
  • National 14oz Striped Coffee Tumbler

Since I’m not getting these for myself, I don’t know more than that! But they’re a nice add-on to the iPod Touches and gift cards.

Remember, to enter:

  1. Take a picture of yourself adding leisure to a business trip or business meeting. For instance, renting a car and getting out of the city you’re visiting or doing meetings in a scenic location, or extending a business trip to add time to explore a new city.
  2. Follow @garyleff on Twitter and tweet the photo, mentioning @garyleff and #SummerOnTheGo. Do this no later than Friday, May 24 at 8pm Eastern/5pm Pacific.
  3. I will draw the winners at random early next week from those that meet these guidelines and direct message the winner for an email address so we can get the prize out.

I’ve gotten some really creative entries so far, but there aren’t that many entries, taking a photo and tweeting it is more work than commenting on a blog it seems!

ThanksAgain is the service you link your credit card to and then you earn miles automatically when shopping with participating merchants.

It’s like making purchases through an online shopping portal to earn miles for what you’re buying anyway, only it’s for in-person retail purchases.

And it functions like Rewards Network (formerly known as iDine but which to me will always be Transmedia), you hand over your credit card for the purchase and the miles credit automatically nothing else to do and the store clerk doesn’t see any difference between those who earn miles and those who don’t.

I first wrote about ThanksAgain in 2007 when they were giving 500 miles in your choice of program just for signing up. Back then it seemed like most of their partners were dry cleaners, none of which were near me.

I’ve used them for partner transactions in promotions like the US Airways Grand Slam in the past as well, in that case through one of their online rather than brick and mortar shopping options.

They’ve really grown their retail shopping base, with a focus on airports, and tomorrow are launching across Dallas Fort Worth airport where they expect most purchases will count towards mileage earning.

You can choose to earn miles with Alaska Airlines, American, Delta, Frontier, United, US Airways, or Hilton.

Most merchants offering one mile per dollar spent (or two hotel points), with some merchants restricting earning to specific cards (eg not to higher processing cost American Express cards).

In addition, there’s a bonus based on the amount you spend cumulatively each 90 days.

  • Earn 500 bonus miles/points when you spend $250 or more (2 miles/points per dollar spent)
  • Earn 1,500 bonus miles/points when you spend $500 or more (3 miles/points per dollar spent)
  • Earn 4,000 bonus miles/points when you spend $1,000 or more (4 miles/points per dollar spent)
  • Earn 25,000 bonus miles/points when you spend $5,000 or more (5 miles/points per dollar spent)

With Hilton the bonus points earning is double, but the points are worth less. My own earning choice would be United, followed by American and then Alaska, but your preferences may vary.

There’s currently a 100 mile signup bonus with your choice of program, no transactions required.

Up until 2001, employees of the US federal government were not allowed to accrue frequent flyer miles from official travel and apply them towards personal trips. They were supposed to earn miles and use them to offset the cost of government travel.

This didn’t really happen in practice. Since employees weren’t benefiting from collecting miles, those that weren’t attuned to also earning elite status tended not to bother collecting the miles at all.

There was no good way of tracking the miles earned on government travel, and certainly no good centralized way of monitoring this. It’s difficult to parse out miles earned from one type of activity from miles earned for things like credit card spend, rental cars, hotel stays, transfers in from other programs, etc.

And then actually using the miles for work purposes represents a challenge, since there’s usually far less flexibility and no desire to go through the hassle of getting the seats.

Ultimately the federal government determined that the policy wasn’t actually saving money. So why take away the benefits? Now there’s plenty of data that argues low-skilled federal jobs pay more than comparable work in the private sector, once factoring in all benefits. But those job aren’t necessarily the ones which involve travel. Many high-skill jobs don’t pay as well (though this is a very tough issue to parse well), and there was concern that denying mileage-earning was one way in which federal employment of high skilled workers was at a disadvantage relative to private employment.

If it didn’t actually save money for the federal government to dictate all miles would be used for business travel, why not let employees keep their miles as is standard in the private sector?

Twelve years later, American Samoa has apparently decided that government business travel will accrue miles only to offset government travel costs, according to the Associated Press’ Fili Sagapolutele.

American Samoa plans to take away frequent flier miles from government workers who travel on behalf of the U.S. territory.

Gov. Lolo Matalasi Moliga says the territory will use the miles to help medical patients travel off-island when needed, or help students travel for educational programs.

Moliga says Hawaiian Airlines agreed to the plan that takes effect June 1. Hawaiian is the only carrier connecting the U.S. territory to the rest of the country.

According to American Samoa’s government, they’ve solved the issue of co-mingled miles. Hawaiian will apparently be depositing miles into a separate account for use by the government of American Samoa.

Hawaiian seems especially accommodating, considering that the Samoan govenrment has gone all populist on it in the past over its high fares. Hawaiian is the only carrier service Pago Pago in American Samoa. (independent Samoa on the other hand has service to the US, New Zealand, Australia, and elsewhere). And fares are higher because they can’t fill the planes but continue service with US federal subsidies.

Legislation demanding this has been bandied about in American Samoa since at least 2008, though it would likely have been pre-empted by the U.S.’s Airline Deregulation Act.

Still, I wonder how easy it will be to get saver seats on Hawaiian’s thrice-weekly Pago Pago flights. ‘Coach flex’ awards run 55,000 miles each way from Pago Pago to Honolulu. And who will be tasked with booking the awards? Working with HawaiianMiles can be a vexing task indeed. I suspect this won’t amount to much savings for the U.S. territory.

And there’s as yet no indication how this edict will play out with travel beyond Honolulu on other airlines.

News and Notes from Around the Interweb:

Yesterday I discussed the Supreme Court agreeing to hear the case of the Rabbi whose Northwest account was closed for complaining too much.

Ginsburg sued. His complaint was dismissed in federal district court on the basis that state law can’t be used to address airline price, route or service issues since those are pre-empted by the federal Airline Deregulation Act. A 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling disagreed, and now the Supreme Court will hear the issue.

I asked reader and attorney Eric M. Fraser if he’d share thoughts on the case.

    Mr. Fraser is an attorney with Osborn Maledon and an active flyer. He has written posts about the Supreme Court at SCOTUSblog and has preferred status in US Airways’s Dividend Miles program — status he doesn’t want to see disappear.

His comments follow:

Rabbi S. Binyomin Ginsberg had top-tier status in Northwest’s WorldPerks program.  His wife had Silver status.  Northwest revoked his membership in 2008. 

Ginsberg sued Northwest in federal court in California on a number of theories, including that Northwest breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.  This implied covenant theory, rooted in Minnesota state law, means that he is not suing directly for a breach of the terms of the WorldPerks contract (which allows Northwest “in its sole judgment” to cancel a member’s account).  Essentially, Ginsberg’s theory of the case means that even through the WorldPerks agreement gives Northwest the discretion to terminate his membership, he is entitled to compensation if Northwest abuses that discretion and unjustly deprives him of the benefits of the contract.  This is a long-standing principle: parties to a contract have to act in good faith.  But that principle is from state law, not from the terms of the contract itself.

Ginsberg sought to certify his case as a class action on behalf of all former WorldPerks members whose status was revoked.  (We should wonder how big that class would be!)  The district court dismissed the case quickly, meaning a factual record was never developed.  As a result, we don’t know why Northwest kicked him out.  Of note for the readers of this blog, Ginsberg claims his status was revoked because he complained to Northwest too much and that he booked reservations on full flights with the purpose of being bumped.  Unfortunately the case hasn’t developed far enough procedurally to know whether those were really the reasons.

The court dismissed the case because the Airline Deregulation Act says that a state may not enact laws “related to a price, route, or service” of an airline.  Although the case was brought in federal court, state law applies to Ginsberg’s claim, so the court dismissed the case.

Ginsberg appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed and reinstated his case.  The Ninth Circuit reasoned that the Minnesota implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is not related to prices, routes, or service of an airline.  Minnesota isn’t trying to regulate an airline, in other words.  Northwest then turned to the United States Supreme Court, which accepted the case.

Courts have given us several guideposts about that preemption provision.  States cannot prohibit deceptive airfare advertisements.  But they can forbid employment discrimination under state law.  Passengers may also bring state law claims for personal injury and wrongful death.  And, in the American Airlines v. Wolens case that Gary mentioned, a passenger may bring a routine contract claim, but cannot bring a claim based on a state consumer protection law.

Northwest tries to paint the Wolens case as distinguishing between a state-imposed obligation (preempted) versus an obligation the airline imposed on itself through contract (not preempted).  Ginsberg tries to paint the case as distinguishing between enforcing ordinary contract claims (not preempted) versus state enacted laws that have the effect of regulating airlines (preempted).  Said another way, Northwest suggests that the “good faith” obligation is not a contract claim, whereas Ginsberg suggests that it is a state contract remedy.  To law nerds, these distinctions matter.  Both sides are trying to fit the case into one corner or another of the old Wolens holding.

Gary is concerned about the ongoing vitality of the Wolens principle.  Wolens is unlikely to go away.  That means that passengers will continue to have the right to sue for breach of contract under state law.  The question the Supreme Court will answer is whether passengers may also sue when the claim isn’t defined by the terms of the contract, but instead is based on a state’s principle that parties to a contract must operate in good faith.

It’s important to note that the Supreme Court won’t resolve the question many readers will want answered: whether an airline can close accounts and use the broad, unfettered discretion the frequent flyer programs’ contracts give to the airlines.  If Ginsberg’s case survives, the lower courts will begin to answer that question (unless Northwest settles).  But the Supreme Court will answer the question of whether those claims can even be brought in court at all without immediately being dismissed.

The Supreme Court is not hearing any more cases this term before its summer break, so the case will be briefed over the summer and probably argued in the fall.  The decision will be released before June 2014. 

Thanks to Eric M. Fraser for his perspective!

In almost every category the Ink Bold® Business Card and Ink Plus® Business Card come out as the best rewards cards.

They were #1 (tied) in each of the following lists that I put together:

That’s because these cards earn Chase Ultimate Rewards points which can be transferred at a one-to-one ratio to:

  • Airlines: United, Korean, British Airways, Southwest, Virgin Atlantic
  • Hotels: Hyatt, Marriott, Ritz-Carlton, Priority Club
  • Train: Amtrak

Points can actually even be transferred to Hilton at 1:2 by first transferring to Virgin Atlantic and on to Hilton.

What’s more, the cards offer a 50,000 point signup bonus if you put $5000 in spend on them within the first three months of cardmembership.

And the continued points-earning is exceptionally strong with 5 points per dollar on telecommunications (cable and satellite TV, cell phone, internet) and office supply spending (it’s amazing how much of your shopping can be done at office supply stores for 5x) as well as 2 points per dollar on hotels and gas.

There’s a $0 fee the first year, $95 thereafter.

You should consider adding one of these cards to your portfoliobut which one?

The key difference between them is that Ink Bold is a ‘charge card’ and Ink Plus is a ‘credit card’.

That means with Ink Bold you have you pay your bill in full each month. There is no option to pay over time (while paying interest on the balance).

While with Ink Plus you can pay a minimum payment or more each month if you have to.

Of course, even with Ink Plus you should pay off your balance in full each month whether you have to or not. Functionally, then, for those who handle their credit well there’s little if any difference between the cards.

So which one should you get? Let me tell you what I did. I lucked into this approach because I first got the Ink Bold card before Ink Plus was introduced broadly, but I think it turns out to be good way to proceed.

I got the Ink Bold card. I decided I wanted Ink Plus because, well, I have to have first-hand experience with as many of the products I’m going to write about as possible, right? ;) When I applied for Ink Plus I wasn’t instantly approved, so I called up to speak with Chase and I knew why I wanted Ink Plus. Well, besides “because it’s there.” What’s the salient difference? The ability to pay over time. I wouldn’t have had that as a reason if I held an Ink Plus card and was trying to get Ink Bold instead.

If you don’t yet have either card, it’s a close call because they’re so similar, but I’d start with the Ink Bold® Business Card.

(Note that the cards in this post offer credit to me if you’re approved using my links. I try to offer only the best available cards, and most lucrative deals available for those cards. So if you’re aware of better deals than I’ve featured please do let me know! The opinions, analyses, and evaluations here are mine. The content is not provided or commissioned by American Express, by Chase, by Citibank, US Bank, Bank of America, Barclays or any other company. They have not reviewed, approved or endorsed what I have to say.)

There’s a persistent myth that the best time to book an award ticket is instantly when an airline’s schedule opens — and that the time is 12:01am exactly 330 days prior to travel.

But this isn’t quite right on two levels.

  • Different airlines publish their schedules at different times
  • Different airlines load award seats at different times — not necessarily when their schedule loads

Airlines want to release those seats as (saver / low) awards that they don’t expect to sell for cash. They may load some award seats when the schedule opens but ~ 11 months out they only have a rough idea of what seats are going to go unsold. They may not add a single award seat on a given flight when the schedule opens.

As time passes, as the date of travel for a given flight approaches, airlines adjust availability. They constantly evaluate how the flight is selling. If sales exceed expectations, they may withdraw award availability, thinking they can sell the seats for a higher fare instead of offering the seats as awards. When award availability disappears, it does not mean that someone booked the award. It could just as easily mean that the airline decided not to offer the seat as an award anymore, thinking now that they might sell that seat.

Similarly, an airline might add more award seats, perhaps a flight is selling below expectation or circumstances have changed to make them believe that they won’t sell the seat.

Because of the myth of booking award seats the moment the schedule opens, it’s a very common story for people to stay up until midnight. And when they don’t get the seat they want they’re frustrated because they think that somehow someone else beat them to the seats.

Frequently people who want me to book their award tickets for them are anxious to jump on the seats once the schedule loads, they’re just too frustrated with the process of staying up until midnight and getting ‘beaten out’ by someone even quicker on the draw.

While timeshares may actually work this way, frequent flyer awards rarely do. Most of the time when an award seat isn’t available at midnight when the schedule opens, it’s that the airline didn’t make those seats available yet. It was just too early for them to make a decision.

Some airlines open seats right away, others only a month after the schedule loads, and some airlines vary the pattern by route and even day of the week.

Still, since “right away when schedules loads” is one good time to book awards (although not the only time) it’s worth reviewing when different airlines load their schedules.

So when do airline schedules load?

Here is a sampling of airlines and the number of days prior to travel that their schedules load:

  • Adria Airways – 355
  • Air Canada – 355
  • Air China – 355
  • Alaska Airlines – 330
  • All Nippon – 355
  • American – 331
  • Asiana – 352
  • Austrian Airlines – 355
  • AviancaTaca – 355
  • British Airways – 353
  • Cathay Pacific – 360
  • Croatian – 355
  • Delta – 331
  • EgyptAir – 355
  • Finnair – 354
  • Iberia – 354
  • Lufthansa – 349
  • Qantas – 354
  • Singapore – 350
  • Thai – 338
  • Turkish – 354
  • United – 337
  • US Airways – 330
  • Virgin Atlantic – 336

But there are exceptions…

There are some exceptions and variations in these dates. For instance, while ANA schedules are loaded 355 days out I do not believe you can use the ANA website to search more than 331 days out. And while Thai is currently showing schedules 338 days out, I’ve seen them not load schedules past 260 days … and then add a couple of months all at once.

I didn’t include Etihad in the list above. Right now I’m seeing their schedules 331 days out, though I’m certain I’ve seen them loaded farther out in the past. Perhaps they changed this when they switched reservation systems towards the end of February.

Also not on the list is Air France because of a strange anomaly — they won’t let members book award travel more than 10 months out, even though schedules are loaded further out than that (and thus Delta and Alaska Airlines members can book travel on Air France earlier than Air France’s own members can).

Some airlines load schedules flight-by-flight in the local time zone of departure when the calendar turns. But that’s not universally true. Time zone issues can affect the moment that a schedule becomes available.

The most important date is when the airline whose miles you have loads its schedule

In most cases you can only book as far out as the airline whose miles you are using loads its own schedules (although of course you cannot book on a partner farther than out than that partner loads its own seats).

So even though AviancaTaca loads its own schedules 355 days out, you can’t use their LifeMiles to book a United flight more than 337 days out from travel.

Conversely, you cannot use United miles to book an Air China flight more than 337 days out, even though Air China has already had its schedules loaded for 18 days — because United’s systems go out only 337 days.

The lone exception to this rule I can think of is Alaska Airlines. Even though Alaska loads its schedules 331 days out, you can use Alaska Airlines miles to book partner flights whenever those partner flights are loaded. You can’t include Alaska Airlines flights in the itinerary until 331 days out, of course, so if you book a Qantas or Cathay Pacific flight immediately upon schedule opening you’ll have to call back later when the Alaska schedules open to add any domestic feeder flights to your award.

The U.S. Senate is sometimes called the “world’s greatest deliberative body.”

The Senate of the United States was formed on the example of the ancient Roman Senate. The name is derived from the senatus, Latin for council of elders

In this grand tradition, Senator Chuck Schumer wants airlines to reverse their recent increases in change fees on non-refundable tickets.

The New York Democrat said on Sunday that higher fees recently implemented by Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, American Airlines, and U.S. Airways make it difficult for families on budgets to travel, according to the Associated Press.

The four carriers recently raised fees on ticket changes from $150 to $200

The distinguished Senator Schumer’s Wikipedia entry describes his political style,

Schumer’s propensity for publicity is the subject of a running joke among many commentators. He has been described as an “incorrigible publicity hound”.[19] Bob Dole once quipped that “the most dangerous place in Washington is between Charles Schumer and a television camera”,[20] while Barack Obama joked that Schumer brought along the press to a banquet as his “loved ones”

But is it fair to say that the airlines are making travel unaffordable?

In inflation-adjusted 2000 dollars, the average airfare in 1979 was $442.88. In those same 2000 dollars, the average airfare plus related fees in 2011 was $279.60.

What’s more, the average trip distance has increased over 33 years from 1947 miles roundtrip to 2351 miles roundtrip.

The inflation adjusted cost per mile (fare plus fees) was 23 cents in 1979 and 12 cents in 2011.

I had this exchange on Twitter about Senator Schumer’s call for rolling back change fees.

Do you really trust Chuck Schumer to make your travel fantasies come true?

In response to my post the other day on Washington DC’s taxi protection racket cracking down on Uber again, I got a nastygram from the DC Taxicab Commission’s public information officer.

Her argument is essentially that they aren’t forcing Uber to go out of business here, since they could always just comply with the new rules.

But nowhere has she or anyone else explained the consumer harm that supposedly follows from Uber being allowed to run its business (which is why the much more likely explanation is that the taxi commission is backing entrenched interests, as they’ve done before — with a string of federal convictions to show for it).

It turns out, of course, that the DC taxi commission’s valiant efforts to protect consumers are occurring despite never having actually received a complaint from any consumer.

The note I received, though, was incredibly telling about where the DC government is coming from in all of this.

Ironically, regulators in DC have had the farthest to go to clean up the taxi industry because of the legacy of a deregulated, open-entry system which was the most atrocious in the US. Uber represents just the cutting edge of an attempt to deregulate yet again — with the same disastrous consequences. The city needs to stand up to Uber and its thuggish ways if they are to achieve a modern, integrated, and well-governed cab industry.

They believe that DC has had the farthest to go to clean up the industry because it used to be possible for anyone who could meet safety standards to start a business… rather than because it was about the dirtiest, most crooked agency in local government anywhere in the country?

There are only two real game changing innovations in rental cars that I can think of in my lifetime. One is keeping your information on file so that you can be pre-assigned a car and take off by showing just your driver’s license. The other is picking your own car.

Avis recently has been experimenting with the pick your own car concept in some locations. The pioneer in the space, of course, is National with its Emerald Aisle. I love National’s “Go Like a Pro” slogan because their Emerald Aisle concept, to me, is the perfect frequent business renter feature.

But there are really only five major travel stories that resonate with the public, and one of them is “summer travel.” So I don’t blame National one bit for looking to catch a little bit of attention with summer.

National Car Rental wants to help you get out of the office and enjoy what summer has to offer. So they asked me if I’d help them with a giveaway here on the blog. And since I don’t take anything myself when I do those, I have two of National’s “Summer On-The-Go” Prize Packs:


  • Package one: Apple iPod Touch, $250 AMEX Gift Card, National-branded swag
  • Package two: Apple iPod Touch, $50 iTunes Gift Card, National-branded swag

Since National – whose image is primarily as a business travel rental company – wants to blur the line between business and leisure travel this summer, here’s what we’re going to do.

There are several ways you can leverage your business travel to add a leisure component, from renting a car and getting out of the city you’re visiting (Heading to Austin? Drive to Lockhart for Barbecue!) to doing meetings offsite maybe outside in a park or a restaurant on the water or other scenic location, or even extending a business trip to give yourself a day or a weekend in a new location.

Entering is simple:

  1. Take a picture of yourself adding leisure to a business trip or business meeting.
  2. Follow @garyleff on Twitter and tweet the photo, mentioning @garyleff and #SummerOnTheGo. Do this no later than Friday, May 24 at 8pm Eastern/5pm Pacific.
  3. I will draw the winners at random early next week from those that meet these guidelines and direct message the winner for an email address so we can get the prize out.

The fine print: the contest is open to US residents only (talk to the lawyers on this, sorry!). I’m the final arbiter in all matters related to this contest and in all matters of interpretation. There is no appeal. I’m doing this because there’s an opportunity to send out some cool prizes from a brand I like, and not taking anything from them in return, so please don’t give me a hard time in the process.

Any questions? Ask away. And remember that while you can share your thoughts here, or post your photos on instagram, only twitter entries count this time.

A couple of years ago the story went ’round about Rabbi Binyomin Ginsberg, a Northwest Airlines Platinum elite who apparently complained too much and had his frequent flyer account shut down. He lost hundreds of thousands of miles (and his elite status) in the process.

Ginsburg sued. His complaint was dismissed in federal district court on the basis that state law can’t be used to address airline price, route or service issues since those are pre-empted by the federal Airline Deregulation Act.

A 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling disagreed, and now the Supreme Court will hear the issue. The Supreme Court’s docket is here.

I admit I’m a bit surprised by the Supreme Court’s willingness to take this case, although I have not yet read the 9th Circuit’s decision (but I have read the petitioner’s brief to the Court).

Delta argues that the 9th Circuit’s ruling is inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent as recognized in other circuits.

The issue here at this point is whether the District Court was correct to throw out the case as being precluded by the deregulation act which forbids certain kinds of state regulation of airlines.

Under the Court’s American Airlines vs Wolens decision, a suit for breach of contract by a frequent flyer program shouldn’t be pre-empted by federal law. However, in my rudimentary understanding, a claim created by state law (in this instance, an implied covenant of good faith in Minnesota law) would be barred.

The airline’s claim that they terminated the Rabbi’s membership over complaints related to service doesn’t mean that suing over alleged breach of contract by the mileage program means the state law addressing breach of contract is in fact impermissibly regulating service. But the Rabbi’s claim of breach of contract was thrown out by the District court and is not at issue here.

What’s being considered is not what’s in the Northwest Worldperks contract (I haven’t re-read it, but I’m confident it would have permitted changing of terms and termination of membership). What’s being considered is whether, aside from the contract, this is ‘fair’ under state law.

If the terms of the frequent flyer program are considered pricing and service under the Airline Deregulation Act, as Delta contends Wolens clearly says they are, then the Rabbi’s claim under Minnesota state law is pre-empted. If the terms of the frequent flyer program are entirely apart from the basics of operating an airline (the airline service, ticket pricing) as the 9th Circuit believes, the claim should be allowed.

In some manner it comes down to whether operating a frequent flyer program is part of operating an airline, with the miles a rebate for ticket purchases (and thus part of its pricing) or whether operating such a program is in effect a side business distinct from the operations of an airline.

And even if a frequent flyer program was primarily about flying when Wolens was decided, it might no longer be so now that a majority of miles are earned via financial services activities rather than flying.

I’m not especially sympathetic with the Rabbi whose couple dozen complaints seem a bit much, and I do not blame the airline for firing him as a customer. It seems to me that this ought to be a two-way decision, the Rabbi could choose not to fly an airline any longer if it wasn’t providing him the service he expects and an airline ought to be able to choose not to sell tickets to someone that it finds is too costly to satisfy.

On the other hand I do think that confiscating earned-miles is extreme, and I’d certainly seek redress of that myself if I could.

While I don’t think the Rabbi’s desire for a class action lawsuit makes sense, I also think there’s an important principle in Supreme Court jurisprudence potentially at issue and I’d hate to see Wolens narrowed or even interpreted in a time capsule, as though frequent flyer programs are what they were 18 years ago when the case was decided. Delta (which took over Northwest) is represented in the case by former Solicitor General Paul Clement, a real legal heavyweight.

The case will bear watching, entirely apart from the specifics of a kvetching Rabbi.

Do any of lawyers among my readership care to weigh in, especially to contradict or correct my read of the case?

(HT: LarryInNYC on Milepoint)

A year ago I broke down the deficiencies in the Marriott Rewards elite program. Some of those have since been corrected, at least a little bit.

Marriott Gold status comes after 50 nights, which is average for top tier status with other chains. Platinum takes a whopping 75 nights. One would expect superior or at least industry average benefits at that level.

And yet late checkout is on request only, day of departure (rather than guaranteed). Resorts are excluded — but since it isn’t guaranteed, why exclude resorts? Other chains exclude resorts from their guarantee, but will generally oblige subject to availability which is all Marriott is offering anyway.

Marriott’s breakfast benefit has also been weaker than the competition’s — free breakfast in the US and Canada has been guaranteed Monday – Friday only, with resorts excluded (although some properties extend it as a courtesy on the weekends anyway).


    Marriott Boca Raton goes above and beyond, offering restaurant buffet breakfast when their club lounge is closed

Now the great weekend fast appears to be ending. Nancy Trejos reports in USA Today,

Starting June 22, Marriott Rewards Gold and Platinum Elite members plus a guest will get free continental breakfast seven days a week in the lounge or restaurant of participating hotels in the U.S. and Canada, the company will announce Tuesday.

If you’d rather not claim your muffin in the morning, you can opt for an additional 750 rewards points, instead.

Presumably the resort exclusion will continue to apply. And Marriott Courtyard properties apparently will not begin offering breakfast to elites, either.

The piece does make it sound as though Marriott is doing something industry-leading, mentioning only Starwood’s offering of free breakfast as a choice to Platinums. Starwood Platinums choose between their check-in points amenity and breakfast, while Marriott Rewards is offering points in lieu of breakfast but not as a substitute for the check-in amenity.

Unmentioned is that Hilton offers breakfast as a benefit to Gold and Diamond members, and Hyatt offers full breakfast (not just continental breakfast) to Diamonds when there’s no club lounge available.

Last month I surveyed which chains offer the most generous elite breakfast benefits. And while the option to take points instead of breakfast when there’s no lounge available on the weekends will be nice, Marriott will still lag Hyatt, Starwood, and Hilton due to the (presumably continued) resort exclusion.

« previous home | top

View from the Wing is a project of Miles and Points Consulting, LLC. Some links to credit card and other products on this website will earn an affiliate commission, and this website has a financial relationship with several credit card issuing banks. All content unless otherwise noted or quoted is the author's own, and not provided or commissioned by any other entity. Opinions have not been reviewed, approved, endorsed, or likely even edited for typos and grammatical errors by any other entity. Occasionally a travel or other product provider may offer a complimentary item, most often that is the source of giveaways, but the author of this blog may also occasionally benefit from the blog's popularity and your travel experiences may differ This site is for entertainment purpose only. The owner of this site is not an investment advisor, financial planner, nor legal or tax professional and articles here are of an opinion and general nature and should not be relied upon for individual circumstances.

Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by the credit card issuer. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of the credit card issuer, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the credit card issuer. This site may be compensated through the credit card issuer Affiliate Program.