Scott Mayerowitz has an ABC Travel piece tied to Spirit’s new charges for oversized carry-on bags going into effect.

I’m quoted in the piece saying, “This is the airline that’s famous for hating their customers,”

And of course I believe that — Ben Baldanza spurred the creation of the ‘cockroach’ movement (elite passengers so identifying themselves) after comments that passengers who always bought the cheap US Airways fares the company were offering were not necessarily loyal. And of course US Airways as a carrier was itself the cockroach that would not die, in part because of the loyalty of such unvalued customers.

Then as head of Spirit, Baldanza was famous for his ‘oops’ reply-all to staff that a complaining customer wasn’t worth an apology, treat them badly but they’ll be back for more cheap fares.

The carry-on fees are hardly even Spirit’s dumbest ones yet.

Plus Baldanza isn’t entirely wrong, either. He’s more customer friendly in the sense that he and his airline are more transparent in what they intend to offer than most. And he’s clearly differentiating his product.

Whenever Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary falls out of the news, he makes some blustery claims about charging to use the lavatories onboard. He’s not doing that really, just getting media attention, and focusing consumers on the lengths they’ll go to ‘be the cheapest’. It’s no surprise Baldanza has claimed that Spirit bookings have gone up since announcing the planned carry-on fees. (Of course it could also just be the peak summer travel season..)

The point that got lost in my quote above for the ABC piece is that while Spirit may not be the most customer friendly, they’re quite well known for the product they deliver, if a customer is unhappy they should just make a choice. I blame no one but the consumer for stories like this.

Spirit offers what it offers. Consumers that are happy with the tradeoff should fly them. Cosnumer who won’t be happy with their offering should book elsewhere. I know I do.

There’s certainly no reason to yell and scream at congressioanl hearings over the matter, outside of perhaps Ft. Laduerdale they’re hardly even a major player, and Ft. Lauderdale isn’t even the major airport in the area. There’s plenty of consumer choice, consumers should just… choose.

  1. Andrew said,

    I don’t care.

  2. SAN Greg said,

    I couldn’t agree more. Those who book with Spirit – caveat emptor!

  3. Should Tall People Be Entitled to Complimentary Upgrades, or Required to Stand During Flight? - View from the Wing said,

    [...] I’m second to no one in my belief that it’s just a downright silly decision to fly Spirit. I don’t [...]

  4. Add A Comment

home | top

View from the Wing is a project of Miles and Points Consulting, LLC. Some links to credit card and other products on this website will earn an affiliate commission, and this website has a financial relationship with several credit card issuing banks. All content unless otherwise noted or quoted is the author's own, and not provided or commissioned by any other entity. Opinions have not been reviewed, approved, endorsed, or likely even edited for typos and grammatical errors by any other entity. Occasionally a travel or other product provider may offer a complimentary item, most often that is the source of giveaways, but the author of this blog may also occasionally benefit from the blog's popularity and your travel experiences may differ This site is for entertainment purpose only. The owner of this site is not an investment advisor, financial planner, nor legal or tax professional and articles here are of an opinion and general nature and should not be relied upon for individual circumstances.

DISCLAIMER: This content is not provided or commissioned by American Express. Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of American Express, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by American Express. This site may be compensated through American Express Affiliate Program.