Monthly Archive for November, 2009

Heading to the Airport! Follow the Adventures on Twitter!

My dear old dad is giving me a ride to SFO. I’ll be updating my crazy redeye adventures back to New York on Twitter.

Click here to see what’s happening on Twitter! I’ll keep the 140 characters or fewer updates scintillating and simultaneously nitpicky of United details ;)

Tomorrow’s (Monday’s) 6am ORD – LGA Flight Oversold

Well, well, well. As about which I wrote in my previous post, I had questioned whether my 6am O’Hare (ORD)  – La Guardia connection for tomorrow was actually oversold, or simply sold to capacity. I just gave a quick call over to the 1K desk to ask, the agent reported the flight is indeed oversold. When I tried to inquire by how many people (why not?), he responded as if I had just asked something inappropriate about his wife, and said, after a chuckle, “I cant tell you that.”

Muy interesante. I wouldn’t mind a bit of flying excitement tomorrow.

Return to NYC Migggghty Intriguing

As I look out the window of my house in San Francisco,  the sun shines brilliantly from a cloudless blue sky, casting long shadows on the houses and trees, and causing a slightly-dramatic lighting of one tower of the Golden Gate Bridge, against the dark hills of the Marin Headlands.

It’s always a bit sad to leave my favorite spot on Earth, and leave the family behind again to return to New York City, especially to those famous three hellish weeks before final exams. I must say, I miss ending a break from school just by heading across the bay to my apartment in Berkeley – leaving felt much less dramatic, and I could always catch a view of the glimmering lights of the city when I returned to my apartment on at night. It’s even harder to depart now with that pang of envy I feel that most of them get to stay behind in the Bay Area – my family in San Francisco, and one brother in Stanford – at least I can share the melancholy with my youngest brother, who heads back to college in Southern California and has become the second Roberge to leave the Bay Area behind.

Oh, well. My work is in New York City, now, and though I’d return to San Francisco and/or Berkeley to live/work/school tomorrow, my work is in New York.

In a few hours, I’ll start my trek back to the East Coast, begining with United’s most notorious redeye – the famous San Francisco – O’Hare (ORD) four-hour redeye that departs San Francisco at 11pm. I haven’t been on this redeye in about two and a half years – but, remember it vividly from my first mileage run, on a mistake Q/Y-Up fare to Saint Louis, on my first mileage run ever, back when I thought there was nothing more impressive on an airplane than a first class seat on a 777, and a lukewarm Heineken. I remember landing about at about 4.30am, and blearily making my way through a dark and quiet O’Hare airport for my United Express connection to Saint Louis. This time, I’m at the mercy of a student budget and the fact that the most cost effective option home put me on this redeye, with a 6am connection to La Guardia. Back, theoretically, in time for my 1pm organic chemistry class.

Making my sojourn even more enticing, though, are the potential VDB (voluntarily-denied-boarding – ya know, those who feverishly hope to offer their seat on an oversold or likewise crowded flight in exchange for travel credits – also known as a “bump.” An interesting side note, Oakland was known as “Bump City” in the 1960s, with a “bump” being a small rock of cocaine. I find many parallels in the rabid and addictive fashion many flyers, myself included, clamor for “bumps” [the flight type], and how much we’re willing to inconvenience/alter our already rough travel days for travel credits) opportunities. According to both United.com, and SeatCounter.com, my 6am ORD – LGA is down to zeroes – meaning, dear United isn’t selling any more seats, in any class of service, for that flight. Now – the zeroes, however, don’t guarantee a bump. United may not have actually oversold the flight, but simply sold it to capacity, to be safe, and not have to worry about finding extra seats, especially when the first five ORD – LGA, and ORD – EWR flights of the day aren’t taking any more buyers, either. 6am flights, though, run the risk for no-show passengers, either with sleeping through their alarm clocks, or late-landing redeyes. Regardless, I will definitely assess the situation in my half-asleep state at the gate tomorrow morning, just because, currently, the flight is in the best shape possible to have to look for volunteers. The SFO – ORD flight, though, is not in such lucrative shape, with SeatCounter showing 9+ more seats available in some of the higher fare buckets. Unless something goes awry with an earlier Chicago flight, or a similar hub-to-hub misconnect, I bet those seats will remain empty. And, yes, I’m not really counting on someone to buy nine Y-class tickets at the list minute. There does not seem to be any of the famous flight-delaying-caliber weather in O’Hare’s forecast, either.

Stay tuned. Let’s see if I might just be able to delay to the inevitable return to New York, and stop the onslaught of final exams just a bit longer. Here’s hoping, United.

A Successful, if Not Tumultuous, United Experiment

When I originally booked my ticket home from New York to San Francisco for Thanksgiving “break,” I scheduled my flight home for Wednesday, thinking, incorrectly, I had a biology exam on Tuesday.

After I realized that I actually had no bio exam (my fault), and that it was too late to change my ticket, I developed this rather radical scheme that I would try my hand at leaving a day earlier than my originally booked departure, a 6.00am JFK – SFO flight on Wednesday. I figured I could provide a compelling argument – mostly, based around the idea that I could act sufficiently politely and meekly enough and spin a convincing tale that I would like to assist dear United Airlines in removing one more passenger from the fray of Wednesday pre-Thanksgiving flying by simply allowing me to standby for a flight that Tuesday. A bit presumptuous, and tenuous of a plan, yes, but I figured I’d give it a try and see what would happen.

I queried the FlyerTalk community, my original post on the United forum soon being moved into a larger, consolidated “Standby the Day Before Flight” thread. Apparently, I would not be the first soul to try standing by the day before flight – and, apparently, the results were not good. Most people were met with requirements to pay a change fee, and denied travel otherwise. Yes, I thought, I’d be trying to expand boundaries a bit, but why not give it a try, I reasoned. Most people, though, remained skeptical. “Good luck,” someone on Twitter said. “You’ll probably need it.”

I stayed determined, though, to escape New York and return to San Francisco a day early. After an abbreviated week of an organic chemistry exam, and a 25 page biology lab report, I blearily made my way to JFK, and strode my way to the United counter. I made myself very clear, that my reservation had been booked for tomorrow, but if possible, I would like to travel today. The agent seemed unsure if she could confirm me on the flight, made a few calls, and said she could only place me on standby, the outcome I was expecting. Fine, I said. There were plenty of seats available (so much for the hellish Thanksgiving travel meme perpetrated by cable news and mainstream media). I took my departure management cards and headed through security, with about two hours to wait before my (hopeful) departure on the 5.16pm flight to San Francisco.

Exhausted, I zoned out by the gate, waiting for the gate agents to appear and ready for the fligh’s departure, and waited for the gate monitors to start displaying the flight information, at which point I could check my status on the standby list. About an hour before the flight, a gate agent walked to the desk, clad in a polyester vest, hair parted in the middle like a fault line, leading to an obvious crop circle of a bald spot. I kept my eyes trained on the agent, just to try to ascertain and discern his demeanor, and immediately, he placed a slab of wood with  “Position Closed” emblazoned on the front. Ah, I  nodded to myself. One of those types agents – immediately closing himself off to the potential for any passengers to ask a question. Something seemed a a bit ominous, but I soon reassured myself that I may board the flight when the monitors appeared with 14 seats remaining, and my name first on the standby list. Biz class, apparently, was full, but I really didn’t care – I just wanted a chance to head home early.

Soon, the agent removed his sign, and a few minutes later, he paged for me. Thinking he was about to issue my boarding pass, I headed to the podium.

“I don’t see your reservation,” he begins in a surly fashion. I quickly note his name, and the title, “Service Director” on his nametag. This was an inauspicious beginning to the conversation.

“Yeah, I’m actually traveling tomorrow, but standing by for a flight tonight,” I responded.

“So, your reservation is for tomorrow?”

“Yes,” I replied. “But, I am on standby for tonight.” I showed him my departure management card.

“You cannot standby for a flight a day early,” he responded coolly, and I felt a surge of blood rush in my ears and a charge of adrenaline as he brought the challenge.

“Why not,” I ask, raising the severity of my voice, and adding a hint of irritation. “I’m on the standby list for tonight. It says right here .  . .”

He continues with impeccable calmness, but injecting his sanguine cadence with condescension. “You cannot travel the day before your flight without paying the 150 dollar change fee.”

“But, I understand. I’m on the standby list. The check in agent put me on the list.”

“Yes, I understand that they may have put you on the list, but they should not have done that.”

I decided I would not recede. I had traveled too far to JFK, endured a hellish week, and saw 14 available seats, that I would buckle. I was determined to press my case. “I really don’t understand the problem. The agent legitimately put me on the list, and there are 14 seats left on this airplane. Really, what trouble is it?” I really failed to see any legitimacy in this argument, when an agent placed me on standby for tonight, and there were still 14 seats. Perhaps my reasoning is why I do not, and will never, work in some sort of business-related field, but I really saw no issue with my very-real and tangible department management cards, and putting me on a non-full airplane. He seemed querulous, as if he was simply nitpicking unnecessarily on United’s rules, and attempting to change the prior agent’s actions. “What really is the problem?” I ask, more loudly, more pressingly.

“It’s the same reason we don’t give out first class seats if they are empty . . . ” he tries.

“No,” I tersely interrupt. “That’s a completely irrelevant argument, and has nothing to do with me being on standby. I’m on standby right now, and you’re trying to change it. The check in agent legitimately placed me on the list.”

“And I will go get that employee in trouble for that,” he replies. “Because that is what you seem like you want me to do.”

I couldn’t believe his response – irrelevant, asinine, and stuffed with idiocy. This man was utterly bereft of any sort of etiquette – and instead, remained flippant and bellicose, trying to twist the situation to astonishingly idiotic territory.

I decided to match his condescension. “Sir, I don’t know why you feel the need to attack your own employees . . . ”

He interrupted. “You do not seem to be able to hear what I am saying. You will not get on this flight without paying the change fee.”

“But, I am on the standby list – what happens now?”

“I am not putting you on this flight unless you pay the 150 dollars.”

“Then,” I say flatly, “I want to speak to a supervisor. I want to speak to someone higher than a service director.”

“Sure,” he replies with false confidence.

“And, I am taking your name, and writing United.”

“Go ahead, take it,” he continues to challenge, still feeling the high of his power trip and probably thinking that his hairs style commanded some sort of respect. He radioed for the supervisor, and reported that she was in a meeting, and didn’t know where she would be coming down. I said I would wait.

I wait, and boarding begins. The Service Director still tries to remain nonchalant, and begins cheerfully boarding the flight. Eventually, the supervisor appears, shakes my hand, and introduces herself. Immediately, she appears to be one of the nicest people with whom I have ever spoken.

I begin to tell her the story – how I had appeared at the airport, asked to be placed on standby, the agent wouldn’t confirm me, but would place me on the list, and then I found myself in an altercation with a service director, who, I made sure to mention, was combative and rude.

She immediately apologized for the Service Director’s actions – “whatever the outcome,” she said, “it’s not okay for him to behave that way, and I will talk to him.” She looks up my reservation, and then calls the agent at check-in, who, I should mention, was simply wonderful, and extremely kind, and begins to hear the story. At no point, I was impressed to note, was the supervisor combative, make assumptions, dismissive, or try to strike down anyone’s tale – she calmly listened to the agent, who apparently wanted to talk with me on the phone. On the United podium phone, I was amused to note that I was actually using a United podium phone, the agent apologized profusely for the misunderstanding. I told her not to worry, at all, and that I understood the discrepancies, and was really only peeved at the foul attitude of the Service Director. After I hang up, the supervisor, still cool and kind, lets me know that I shouldn’t have been put on the standby list a day early, but then says that, as a person, she doesn’t want to renege on my flying standby.

She prints my boarding pass for the flight that evening. I don’t even care at all that I am in seat 20E. I’m pleased to be able to leave. I thank the supervisor, brightened by how proudly, professionally, and cordially someone could represent United, take responsibility, and simultaneously explain the rules without seeming punitive or didactic.

I thought about saying something snotty to the Service Director as he scanned my boarding pass, but decided not to engage him in his petty tactic of verbal combat.

I didn’t even acknowledge him as he scanned my boarding pass, and gave an almost sincere-sounding, “Have a nice flight, sir.”

Follow me, at 38,000 Feet!

I somehow got on United flight 863 from JFK to San Francisco this evening. I’ll have the full story (oh, it’s a good one) later tonight, but for now, simply wanted to sing the joys of this GoGo inflight wireless on the p.s. flights. Generally, it’s worked marvelously – but, I’m really not sure if I’d pay 12.95 per flight, in the future (UA was handing out freebie cards in the gate area).

Man, though, with in flight internet, I could really pass hours in seat 20E – well, actually, that’s what I’m doing right now.

Click here to see where I am!

All right – I confess – I am going to watch Harry Potter on the overhead monitor. Yup. I said it.

Bacterial Conjugation and Adventures on United Tomorrow

Stay tuned for a (potentially) crazy United feat tomorrow! I’ll have more details in the morning!

For now, I must return to finishing this lab report on bacterial conjugation – yes, it’s a whole lab about how bacteria have sex. Yes, bacteria actually have sex (well, sort of – they can transfer genetic material via a mating bridge).

When I’m out of that thrilling and highly erotic world, I’ll have a full rundown on tomorrow’s United adventure – that could either proceed really well – or turn horribly wrong, very quickly.

Stay tuned!

Slow Posting . . .

Apologies for the slow posts today and yesterday . . . I’m readying for my last set of exams before Thanksgiving break (whoooo!) and trying to write this horrendously long lab report. I’ll have something more substantive tomorrow.

In the meantime, let’s congratulate the California Golden Bears in upsetting the Cardinal of Leland Stanford Junior University in the Big Game today.

Rollllllll on you Bears!!! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr-ahhhhhh. Wish I could’ve been there. My brother, a recent Stanford alum and current student at the law school, called me reluctant congratulations.  Thanks for being a good sport ;) .

Perrin Post and BoardingArea Both Solve Your Frequent Flying Issues, and Hand Out Tickets to “Up in the Air”

Some of the higher-ups here at BoardingArea were nice enough to let me know that the eminent Wendy Perrin of Conde Nast’s The Perrin Post and the always munificent Randy Petersen, founder of FlyerTalk and other ventures, are joining forces not to only hand out ten pairs of passes to upcoming film Up in the Air, which stars exalted actor-humanitarian-liberal George Clooney as a rabid mileage runner and points collector, they’re looking to solve your frequent flyer problems, and reward folks who have the most mind-boggling mileage conundrums.

If you’re in the NYC area (or, even if you’re not), simply post your the frequent-flyer issue that plagues you the most in the comments area of this Perrin Post, and the man himself, Randy Petersen, plus, perhaps, the assistance of some of the BA folks, will parcel out answers to the great mysterious of miles and points in tutelage reminiscent of an exchange between Plato and Socrates – “But, what is Starnet Blocking – how can one really block a seat that only theoretically exists, and most likely can’t exist because a United Agent said so?” (Socrates was a 1K, with frequent flights from Crete to Mount Olympus, as detailed by this lethyokoi, with his going nuts when his upgrade failed to clear, and he had to pay six drachma for the processed nectar and ambrosia snackbox from the buy-on-board menu. The service was bad enough to induce someone to drink hemlock. At least he managed to steal packaged feta from the Red Carpet Club).

Anyway, make sure to enter by noon, Eastern Time, on Wednesday, November 25th! The ten most hilarious, stupefying, edifying, and downright craziest frequent flyer enigmas will win prize.  Now’s the time to ask that question that’s really been bothering you – and you’ve felt too ashamed to confide in a co-worker, significant other, or Mister Softee truck man. People care, and want to part with some nerdy-frequent-flyer-goodness movie action, as well.

Mileage Plus Now the Best Frequent Flyer Program of the Legacy Carriers? Uh, I’m Not so Sure

With United’s announcement yesterday of how they plan to continue to allow 1K Mileage Plus members to earn confirmed regional upgrades (CR-1s), it’s pretty much been a ticker-tap parade and a scene reminiscent of the 1960s for the airlines top-tier elites, with flowers, cheesecloth shirts, tambourines, a muddy field, and psychoactive drugs. When United announced its new “Unlimited Domestic Upgrade” program that is to premier midway through 2010, they planned to place all elite members in an electronic lottery for seats at the front of the airplane at the time of ticket purchase, and eliminate all upgrade instruments except for systemwide upgrades (SWUs). Passengers could also choose to upgrade with an extortionist fee, euphemistically deemed a “co-pay,” and part with thousands of miles for a confirmed upgrade. Now, United has changed, and confirmed that 1Ks and Global Service members (all of whom are 1Ks), will continue to earn two CR-1s, maximum, per quarter, for 10,000 miles flown.

Top-tier Mileage Plus members have exalted in universal celebration, and launched a veritable lovefest, heaping adulation, praise, laurels, and various keys to various cities on the airline, praising them for actually listening to their customers. Frequent flyers are professing their love for United with the fervency and poignancy of a Shakespearean sonnet. And, many are proudly proclaiming, in their throes of passion, that with the return of confirmed regional upgrades, United now features the best frequent flyer program among all the legacy carriers for top tier elites.

I’m really not so sure.

First, I applaud United for returning CR-1s to the mix for 1Ks. I’m please I’ll have a method to upgrade on Premium Service (p.s.) flights from NYC to San Francisco, which United previously exempted from their unlimited domestic upgrade fray, thereby forcing members to either burn an SWU or miles and cash to move forward a cabin. Moreover, I always enjoyed being able to upgrade mileage runs all the way to Hawaii from New York, eking out close to 6,000 miles worth of upgrade for one instrument. So, yes, United, returning CR-1s is most appreciated, but I’m not going to go swallow a tab of acid and dance in the streets in celebration with someone strums a sytar.

The program still remains besmirched by Starnet Blocking. As about which I’ve written before, Starnet Blocking is United’s insidious and cowardly practice of actively blocking fancy award seats on Star Alliance partner airlines from mileage redemption. There exist several tools to fully ascertain partner award availability, and United often will simply say they cannot see the flight, period, or that particular airline does not operate that route (Such as Thai Airways from Bangkok, Thailand, to Singapore). That, to me, is treating your customers as fools, when they can easily see that the award availability exists.

Some flyers, though, really fail to see the gravity of Starnet blocking. I love the attitude on FlyerTalk of the four or five people who act completely bewildered as to why blocking is such a prominent issue with MP members, with the, “Wait, I’ve never been affected by *net blocking – how could anyone else possibly be affected by *net blocking if it hasn’t happened to me?” I would hazard a guess that it’s a major gripe for 90 – 95% of people attempting to book international first/biz class awards with Mileage Plus miles.

I’ve only ever had one award trip where I have called MP, and each flight I requested was deemed available. Sure, with MP, it’s often not too, too difficult to book a trip that’s “good enough,” even with blocking, but – why must we remain complacent, and only book trips that are “good enough?” Why compromise – they’re our miles, we use the ANA tool to confirm flight availability, we know the flight is available. It’s a simple idea – but, one, that until Mileage Plus actually recognizes its cogency, and stops hiding behind cheapness as its defense, Mileage Plus will never, ever be the best frequent flyer program.

I remain puzzled, too, why United, and many, many of its elites, are citing this change with CR-1s as a glorious day, and proof that the airline is listening to feedback. How little have we come to expect from airlines when we celebrate the return of benefit that United spins as an actual change, but in reality, reflects the current system? In a larger context, I think it’s a slimy move. The airline is giving a benefit back that A) they never took away, officially, B) even without CR-1s, it’s not like the idea of upgrading suddenly disappeared on United, and C) isn’t really causing them any extra effort or trouble to return – the CR-1 upgrade system has been in place for eons. But – somehow, people are going nuts over the announcement. I think that UA management is hoping that with this recent lovefest for UA (again, I don’t mind keeping CR-1s!), that people will somehow push Starnet to the aft of their mind. Or – in typical UA fashion, they can use it as a defense, even though the items are completely unrelated – “We returned CR-1s, therefore, we don’t have to lift *net blocking.” While I generally like the move, it certainly doesn’t render Mileage Plus a superior program to American Executive Platinum. From what I’ve heard, ExPlats are upgraded almost every flight on the JFK – SFO/LAX transcons, the equivalent of United’s p.s. service. American does not engage in any partner award blocking, either.

If UA really “listens” to customers, they would lift Starnet blocking. I don’t think it was really too difficult for them to keep a benefit that already existed. Good for all the people who can use CR-1s – I am one of them, but I think we need to ration our praise, and be less effusive. United has really not improved – they’ve simply spun a gimmick as evidence of real change, and listening to customer feedback.

How about, instead of accepting what UA has already given us as some sort of revolution, let’s push the airline to go further. Let’s get them to listen to real complaints of those who provide revenue, earn miles, and can’t use them. A true reward for loyalty, indeed.

Figuring Out This New Interface!

Hello, everyone – in my first official post on BoardingArea.com!

I’m still figuring out the new interface, and how to update some of the internal tool settings. I’m also trying to figure out how to make the text a touch larger on the side of the page.

Many thanks, though, to the BoardingArea team who made it all happen – Randy, Mikel, and Tim, who worked some sort of magic to allow my domain to redirect from the old blog. Most appreciated!

United to Offer 1K and Global Service Members Red Carpet Club Access on p.s. Flights?

There has been no official United announcement, but via this FlyerTalk thread, according to several FlyerTalkers’ conversations with United employees at p.s. cities (New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco), the airline will begin to offer Red Carpet Club (RCC) access to 1K and Global Service Mileage Plus members booked in business class or tickets upgraded to business class. Currently, only passengers booked in p.s. first class have RCC access, and also have International First Class lounge access.

A nice enhancement, if true – which, according to multiple UA employees, the change is certainly imminent. We’ll have to wait and see if 1K (and Global Service members!) in Economy class will obtain RCC access, as well.

I do worry, though, as with all United announcements, of what passengers must relinquish in exchange for the enhancement. United works similar to the law of conservation of energy, except with enhancements: “The number of enhancements in the universe is constant, and enhancements can neither be created, nor destroyed.” Like a change in energy, if United adds something somewhere, that energy has to come from someplace – usually equating to a removal of benefits elsewhere. They never really give anything away for free. Sadly, I’m a bit worried that this change might be the consolation of United removing the ability to readily upgrade on p.s. flights next year, except with a Systemwide Upgrade, or miles and a co-pay. For those that are intrepid enough to upgrade under the new draconian price schemes, access to the RCC might be the consolation prize.

We’ll see – but, again, if that’s the peace offering for losing p.s. upgrades – well, I think UA could offer something better for such a grave change.