News and notes from around the interweb:

  • Earlier in the week I wrote about a blogger declining a pilot’s offer to join the mile high club. Now one accidentally joins?

  • Free $45 on-demand car service credit. That’s more than a free ride for most trips, and may be as much as three free rides depending on distance. Turns out the promotion does indeed run through July 7 (at least as long as the $25 Amazon Local component doesn’t get pulled first).

  • On the subject of car service discounts, Online Travel Review says Groundlink will give you 15% off with promo code BLOG15.

  • Garuda Indonesia is slated to join Skyteam and now will be adding a first class product with ‘chef on board’ service. Should be an interesting option for redeeming Chase points transferred to Korean Air.

  • Terry Maxon reviews the arguments over whether the government should extract a pound of flesh — in the form of slots at Washington’s National airport — as part of not blocking the merger between US Airways and American.

    You can join the 30,000+ people who see these deals and analysis every day — sign up to receive posts by email (just one e-mail per day) or subscribe to the RSS feed. It’s free. Don’t miss out!

  1. liucoke said,

    Using the R-word in DCA’s name like the author does (gratuitously!) is a sign that he’s never lived here, and probably shouldn’t be recommending policy on our airport.

    As someone who uses National almost exclusively for domestic travel, I’m happy to put up with a layover in Chicago or Dallas when I have to fly to some backwater rather than paying higher prices across the board because US has reduced competition.

  2. Gary said,

    @liucoke – I always refer to “National airport” and never “Reagan National” … I vastly prefer using National even with a connection over Dulles. I’d rather keep the route network that exists than redistribute slots and have more duplicative flights inside the 1250 mile perimeter in which flights are permitted without a federal exemption.

  3. Rob said,


    You see “duplicative flights”. I see more competition and more capacity — and therefore lower prices and more availability — on routes that large numbers of people want to fly. That seems like a very good deal, even though it means losing some non-stops to places a small group of people want to go. I suspect that the relevant antitrust agency’s economists will see it the same way.

    The worry, of course, is that the small group that would lose service includes some congressmen. And I can easily see them pushing for keeping the status quo because it’s good for them, even though it’s bad for the vast majority of people.

  4. Gary said,

    @Rob yes more capacity likely drives down price on a given route. But it also means fewer destinations given DCA’s slot restrictions. You have the option of lower prices now via competition from alternate airports, you can go out to Dulles or BWI of course. Slot restrictions mean higher prices and fewer choices, and are the real root of the issue/tradeoff rather than redistribution of those slots of course..

  5. Add A Comment

home | top

View from the Wing is a project of Miles and Points Consulting, LLC. Some links to credit card and other products on this website will earn an affiliate commission, and this website has a financial relationship with several credit card issuing banks. All content unless otherwise noted or quoted is the author's own, and not provided or commissioned by any other entity. Opinions have not been reviewed, approved, endorsed, or likely even edited for typos and grammatical errors by any other entity. Occasionally a travel or other product provider may offer a complimentary item, most often that is the source of giveaways, but the author of this blog may also occasionally benefit from the blog's popularity and your travel experiences may differ This site is for entertainment purpose only. The owner of this site is not an investment advisor, financial planner, nor legal or tax professional and articles here are of an opinion and general nature and should not be relied upon for individual circumstances.

Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by the credit card issuer. Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of the credit card issuer, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the credit card issuer. This site may be compensated through the credit card issuer Affiliate Program