Miles and points were once seen as a reward for loyalty, a customer to be treated better and more flexibly when reaping the fruits of travels. In recent times though airlines have become more draconian with change fees and some have sought to gouge customers with accumulated miles for cash co-pays when booking awards under the guide of ‘fuel surcharges’.

Instead of offering ‘free’ travel the notion is that miles cover just the ‘fare’ and not add-ons.

Only a few airlines in the US, and for travel on a few partner carriers, impose these fuel surcharges on customers booking award tickets. But they’ve been a specter haunting programs for some years – a risk of future devaluations.

But the very existence of fuel surcharges is an historical and technological accident. And recent program devaluations actually make it less likely that will see the spread of fuel surcharges in the US any time soon.

What are fuel surcharges?

First of all, understand what “fuel surcharges” are. They’re generally a fixed amount of money added to a fare. The amount will usually be the same across all fares for a given city pair. In other words, all “New York – London” fares that an airline publishes will add the same amount for fuel surcharge.

There are some exceptions to this. An airline may file a different fuel surcharge amount for premium cabins (so a business class ticket might have a higher fuel surcharge than a coach one). And it is possible to file discounted fares that do not incur fuel surcharges or that have lower ones.

But in general, each route can have a fuel surcharge and it’ll be a constant amount added onto all fares for that route.

Here’s a fare breakdown for a random set of dates in September flying British Airways roundtrip economy between San Francisco and London Heathrow.

The fare is $598 ($284.50 outbound plus $313.50 return). The fuel surcharge is $458. The rest of the taxes and fees total $220.10.

Why do airlines impose fuel surcharges?

Once we establish that, it’s easy to understand why fuel surcharges are useful to airlines. Fuel surcharges have nothing to do with the price of fuel.

It makes no logical sense for ‘fuel’ to be broken out separately from the rest of the cost of transportation. It’s one of the cost factors in providing transportation. You cannot buy transportation with the option of taking the fuel or not. Fuel surcharges are, fundamentally, part of the cost of transportation.

Fuel surcharges are an easy, efficient way for airlines to alter their airfares across a given market. They can change one number — the fuel surcharge — and raise or lower (almost) all prices in the market at once.

That’s a whole lot easier than changing the price of every single fare in the market.

For paid tickets, fuel surcharges don’t really matter. They’re displayed as part of the ticket price. They don’t really increase the amount most consumers pay. (They may raise the price paid on some contract fares, where a base fare is negotiated but the surcharges may be on top, that doesn’t touch most consumers but it’s another reason airlines like fuel surcharges.)

How do fuel surcharges influence the cost of award tickets?

This becomes a much bigger deal for award tickets than for paid tickets. It’s almost an historical accident. Airlines use the tool to quickly and efficiently alter all fares in a given market. And as a byproduct they’ve figured out a way to extract cash from their frequent flyers for ostensibly “free” tickets.

Most European and Asian airlines say, effectively, that miles cover the cost of the airfare but not the taxes and fees that are part of the ticket.

So when you redeem your miles, the fare is covered by the fuel surcharges are not. All of a sudden instead of collecting perhaps $50 – $200 in airport taxes in government fees, an airline might collect nearly $1000 total in taxes, government fees, and fuel surcharges.

In our San Francisco – London example above, the fare is $598 and the taxes and fees are $678.10. An airline adding fuel surcharges onto the cost of an award would require the person redeeming miles to come out of pocket $678.10 (not including any telephone booking fee). That’s 53% of the cost of just buying the coach ticket even though one is using miles..

One implication of programs that add furl surcharges to award tickets is that coach awards almost never make sense — a fuel surcharge often represents a substantial portion of the total ticket cost, sometimes even the majority. So you’re spending miles and still coming out of pocket half or more of the cost of a paid ticket, not earning miles and status, and are constrained by award availability.

I’ve even seen cases where discounted fares exist in a market that have lower fuel surcharges — and it is less expensive to buy that ticket than it is to redeem miles (using miles could mean spending more cash rather than less).

Fuel Surcharges on Award Tickets Aren’t Common Amongst US Airlines

United and US Airways do not add fuel surcharges to awards. US Airways isn’t relevant as it will be going away, with the Dividend Miles program folded into American AAdvantage with the merger.

There are currently some fuel surcharges imposed by US airlines:

  • Currently American adds full fuel surcharges to award tickets on British Airways, which is their primary transatlantic partner. All of BA’s partners (including Alaska Airlines) add fuel surcharges onto BA awards. American also adds very modest fuel surcharges onto Iberia awards (Iberia is owned by the parent company of British Airways). But there are no fees on other partners.

  • Delta has an international origination surcharge on trips that begin in Europe that functions like a fuel surcharge. European carriers have them, so Delta can gouge their European members who have (more or less) nowhere else to go. Delta also adds fuel surcharges to awards on certain partner airlines, regardless of where the trip originates – like Air Tahiti Nui and China Southern. But there are no fees on the bulk of airline partners for awards departing North America.

Why Fuel Surcharges Won’t Become More Widespread in the US

While many fear higher costs as a result of less competition, and one way passenger costs can go up is the imposition of fuel surcharges (extracting cash from members trying to use their miles), United’s pending devaluation of miles actually makes it highly unlikely that US-based frequent flyer programs will impose fuel surcharges on an increasing number of awards.

Meanwhile, though fuel surcharges have been increasing worldwide over the course of the past decade – they’re charged by most European and Asia Pacific airline programs and by our neighbors to the North (though not common in South America) – the trend may have been pushed too far. Air France and Virgin Atlantic has capped their fuel surcharges on economy awards (adding these to coach awards undermines the very purpose of redeeming points for that class of service). British Airways still limits fuel surcharges on short haul flights within Europe for active members of their progam.

World trends, and United’s moves, will help hold that fuel surcharge demon at bay. But it’s United’s move that’s most interesting.

By increasing award costs by in some cases over 80%, they make it unthinkable that they will also add cash costs of as much as $500 each way to award tickets. And by United not adding such fees, in order to remain competitive American and Delta will limit theirs as well.

And relatedly, because American already imposes fuel surcharges on their primary transatlantic partner, their awards are already viewed as expensive and that limits their ability to match the sorts of award prices increases that Untied is pushing through February 1.


  1. tassojunior said,

    knock wood

  2. chitownflyer said,

    Gary, you underestimate UA’s plan to get every single dollar out of their customers. I fully expect the next attempt at increased revenue to be the imposition of massive fuel surcharges on United and Star awards. The operational model of the current management is to reduce costs and elite benefits, and impose fees in order to increase profits. However, UA is driving away its elites and even infrequent customers in droves. This perpetuates the cycle, and management implements more cuts and fees, and more customers leave.

  3. Nick said,

    This is the main issue that has kept me from switching to AA. With Aa, If you want to go to certain destinations like Africa, BA is unavoidable and I would feel like a chump paying those kind of fees, even on business awards.

  4. Scott said,

    Also I believe airlines like fuel surcharges because they are neither taxable nor commissionable

  5. Ryan E said,

    I sure hope you’re right Gary. Though I’m admittedly a pessimist at heart, I think chitownflyer could be right that we’re underestimating UA’s (and DL and AA for that matter) hunger for more. My bet would be that surcharges come about for some partner redemptions first – perhaps own-metal redemptions would be much later to see YQ added.

    Domestic airlines would have an easier time adding surcharges for partners. All they have to do is excuse it by saying what AA already has for BA, i.e. “due to [partner airline] requirements, we have to collect this”.

    Actually I think AA would have the easiest time doing this, since BA redemptions already incur it. Sort of like you have customers already accustomed to it on one partner. Maybe they slip in one other partner next, then gradually add more.

    While I would agree that adding YQ on top of UA’s recent huge devals should be unthinkable…who knows with Smisek’s crew.

    Again, I hope you’re right and you have some logical reasons why it should be…let’s hope the airline bean counters have the same logic!

  6. jfhscott said,

    I certainly hope you are correct.

    And the domestic airlines wold be foolish, at a minimum, to add YQ to awards on their own metal. That would terribly undermine consumer acceptance of the loyalty program. 98% of the public may be duped into AA saying, essentially “YQ is unique to BA” when it actually exists with AA paying for it on all other partners. But they would kill the goose that lays the golden egg if they start charging on their own metal. I for one would cut up my cards and opt for a 2% card in a heartbeat.

  7. Joey said,

    Has BA always charged fuel surcharges on its award tickets? If not, what were people’s reactions after BA started charging YQ? I’m asking because it seems almost inevitable for AA/DL/UA to start charging YQ on its award tickets. They may be sneaky about it and offer to pay YQ through miles as well similar to how Emirates currently does it for its own skywards members.

  8. Tom said,

    Honestly, I don’t mind a reasonable YQ or co-pay on award tickets IF it means miles needed don’t go to the moon. I’ll pay 125,000 miles + $500 to go F to Europe on AA, but not 200,000 miles +$500. Another option I wouldn’t object to, at least on AA, would be for AAnytime awards to stay at 2x miles, but include YQ. If that means no triple mileage awards, I could live with it. Acquiring miles is easy, but not THAT easy. A little cash, though, is not that bad. I would encourage all airlines to quit being so damn rigid and stingy. Give people options!!!

  9. Andrew C said,

    >> they make it unthinkable that they will also add cash costs of as much as $500 each way to award tickets

    Are we talking about the same COdbaUA?

  10. CW said,

    So after that long lead-in, the final logic is “It just can’t get any worse!”

    It can’t, right???!

  11. DBest said,

    It didn’t seem to deter Aeroplan, and they started with just AC metal. Granted, they have somewhat of a captive market, but with only 3 legacies left, an oligopoly is just as bad.

  12. Josh said,

    I will proofread your articles for free if I can read them before they are published.
    All the errors are so distracting.

  13. jamesb2147 said,

    Gary, I *think* I’m getting what you’re trying to say. If I’m correct, you should probably update your article.

    United is updating their award chart, massively increasing the cost of awards *on partners*. Basically, it reads to me like United *is* starting to charge fuel surcharges on partner awards, but that they’re collecting that surcharge via miles. So, it wouldn’t make sense for them to collect those via miles (astronomical award prices) and cash. This theory doesn’t preclude United charging fuel surcharges for awards on its own flights someday, but it makes it very unlikely that it will collect surcharges on partner awards.

    Does that sound about right?

  14. chitownflyer said,

    Gary, I do hope I am wrong in regards to United implementing fuel surcharges, but they are now out to get every single dollar possible. I think they would first implement fuel surcharges on Star carrier awards and claim the Star carriers are responsible for this. Then they will levy YQ on United awards, but the amounts will be lower than they are on the Star carriers in order to provide the incentive for United only metal award redemptions.

  15. Add A Comment

home | top

View from the Wing is a project of Miles and Points Consulting, LLC. Some links to credit card and other products on this website will earn an affiliate commission, and this website has a financial relationship with several credit card issuing banks. All content unless otherwise noted or quoted is the author's own, and not provided or commissioned by any other entity. Opinions have not been reviewed, approved, endorsed, or likely even edited for typos and grammatical errors by any other entity. Occasionally a travel or other product provider may offer a complimentary item, most often that is the source of giveaways, but the author of this blog may also occasionally benefit from the blog's popularity and your travel experiences may differ This site is for entertainment purpose only. The owner of this site is not an investment advisor, financial planner, nor legal or tax professional and articles here are of an opinion and general nature and should not be relied upon for individual circumstances.

Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by the credit card issuer. Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of the credit card issuer, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the credit card issuer. This site may be compensated through the credit card issuer Affiliate Program