I know, I really shouldn’t read Chris Elliott’s stuff. But it’s kind of like looking at a car accident on the interstate during rush hour — you want to look away but you can’t…

Anyway, this is where Chris Elliott’s latest piece on hotel minibars comes in. Yes, he has a point — they’re overpriced, but they’re costly to operate and nobody is forcing you to consume anything from them. And as he points out, they never turn a profit. I’ll do everything I can to avoid consuming things from the minibar, but when I’m arriving in a foreign city with 100 degree temperatures in the middle of the night, I’d rather have the option to pay $6 for a cold drink than not have the option.

But Chris Elliott disagrees. They’re so overpriced that they should be banned by law:

What can be removed today can make an unwanted comeback tomorrow. No, they need to be banned, if not by company policy, then by law.

But Chris isn’t just concerned about the cost of the minibar contents, but also about your health:

Wouldn’t it be great if a full-service hotel chain bravely stepped forward — publicly and permanently — and said, “We’re done with minibars”?

If not, perhaps it’s time for the government to step in and encourage the hotel industry to do the right thing, if not because it’s good for customers’ wallets, then for their health. Despite a move by some hotels to add healthier options, most still stock junk food.

Despite the disappearance of some minibars, many resorts continue to market these snack traps as a “convenience.” But they’re no more a convenience than cigarette vending machines, which, thanks to strict federal laws, are now all but extinct. No two ways about it — these money-sucking iceboxes aren’t just bad for hotels, they’re bad for you.

Chris, if the whole “advocating” for consumers thing doesn’t work out, you have a bright future running for the mayor of New York!

  1. July 30th, 2013 at 6:15 pm

    BrewerSEA said,

    The article is a bit odd because the health concerns seem like an excuse not really linked with his actual complaints about minibars. I would leave the political digs elsewhere if I were you though. Do you really want to start an internet discussion about New York’s soda law on your blog?

  2. July 30th, 2013 at 6:19 pm

    Robert said,

    Good write up, stupidity should be called out for what it is.

  3. July 30th, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    TravelinWilly said,

    Trying to draw an analogy between minibars and cigarette machines is nonsensical and bizarre. It’s a silly article, and the pitch seems to be “Get rid of them because they’re a ripoff, but if that excuse doesn’t work, than use ‘health’ as a (fake) excuse, because I hate minibars.” Fortunately Mr. Elliott is not a lawyer. He’s hardly a writer.

    I’ve never had a problem with asking hotels to remove the the contents from minibars, and I’ve never been charged for the “privilege of emptying and restocking the minibar,” from the Waldorf Astoria in Chicago to the Four Seasons in Singapore just a week ago. They remove everything with a smile, and I can then use the fridge for items I enjoy that I can pick up easily while I’m out.

  4. July 30th, 2013 at 6:54 pm

    Dave said,

    My family recently stayed at the Radisson Blu Mall of America in Bloomington, MN. I was not impressed to see that there was no minibar in the Business Class room to which we were upgraded. Unlimited Nespresso, yes, but no minibar. There were even several stemmed glasses, but nothing to pour into them. Distressing.

  5. July 30th, 2013 at 7:07 pm

    viguera said,

    that’s pretty ridiculous and probably just Chris looking for filler as usual.

    chances are that ANY “healthy” options would require a significant amount of maintenance as the items would be perishable. Not to mention that this isn’t a school cafeteria selling soda and candy to kids and it needs to be replaced with apple slices and water… this is a hotel room (which kids can’t occupy on their own in the first place) selling goods to adults.

  6. July 30th, 2013 at 7:19 pm

    Gene said,

    Someone should send Chris Elliott a Royal Ambassador referral.

  7. July 30th, 2013 at 7:40 pm

    Joseph M said,

    Agree Chris Elliot is again being rediculous. Diasagree with your comparison with Mayor Bloomberg. Unnecessary.

  8. July 30th, 2013 at 7:46 pm

    Robert Hanson said,

    File this CE “piece” under Liberal Fascism Rears It’s Ugly Head Again….

    Brings to mind another question:

    Should articles by Chris Elliott be banned by law, to prevent their IQ debilitating effect?

  9. July 30th, 2013 at 7:50 pm

    Mark M said,

    Lucky – Cheers to you for stepping, albeit ever-so-slightly into the political/advocacy realm! (It helps that I agree with you.)

  10. July 30th, 2013 at 8:04 pm

    Ed C. said,

    More things that we need the gov’t to regulate? I’m down for some regulation as a NYCer but this would be too much (and not worth the $$$ to enforce it). Use the fix the MTA instead!!!

  11. July 30th, 2013 at 8:10 pm

    Rose said,

    Is there a reason that an outsized percentage of miles and points enthusiasts seem to be libertarians?

    For the record, I see no reason for a minibar ban, but neither do I have a problem with the government taking away our precious right to have 32 oz of sugar water all in the same cup instead of divided between two separate cups.

  12. July 30th, 2013 at 8:33 pm

    Brian L. said,

    Chris Elliott is a moron. I don’t take anything he says all that seriously. If you do the exact opposite of whatever he suggests, you’ll be right more often than not.

  13. July 30th, 2013 at 8:53 pm

    DeltaTraveler said,

    We don’t need our elected officials wasting time crafting and voting on legislation regarding mini bars. What a waste of time by Mr. Elliott to even consider it.

    We live in a free market society that allows me to eat and drink as I see fit. Including awesome $7 packages of gummy bears and assorted nuts.

  14. July 30th, 2013 at 9:15 pm

    Justin said,


    I’ll take a stab at it, because I’ve noticed it too… I think young-ish people with a DIY mentality, who pride themselves on thinking outside the box are naturally attracted to both classic liberalism and travel hacking. Plus government/bureaucracy and airline management have a lot in common, so it’s only natural that the enemies of both would seek similar enemies!

  15. July 30th, 2013 at 9:39 pm

    James K. said,

    His point is like saying that the government should ban restaurants in Times Square because they’re too expensive.

    I think most rational people figure out by age 12 that if you don’t want to pay an exorbitant price for food, you can go elsewhere.

  16. July 30th, 2013 at 9:52 pm

    Andrew B said,

    Lucky, I think you and I might differ a bit on politics, but I totally agree that a legal ban on hotel minibars is absurd. I can only hope he was kidding. The economy, education, health care, and a ton of other things need serious attention…and lawmakers should spend time banning minibars? WTF?

    Plus, this book I was reading not too long ago by a guy who worked in hospitality basically said that virtually any front desk person will reverse a minibar charge, no questions asked. (Although that doesn’t mean I’m bold enough to actually take something from the minibar and then try to get away with not paying for it.)

  17. July 30th, 2013 at 9:55 pm

    Kris said,

    How about we ban all soft drinks and alcohol, because those are the two main ingredients of the unhealthy enough to be banned minibars I see (and never use). While we’re at it, let’s ban all fast food, as it too can be seen as unhealthy by some, also, high end restaurants because they are too expensive.
    Let the market determine what food is good and bad for peoples’ health and wallet.

  18. July 30th, 2013 at 11:37 pm

    Haldami said,

    Wait, this isn’t view from the Wing? Almost had me fooled there for a min.

  19. July 31st, 2013 at 12:46 am

    thirteenright said,

    What about promoting/encouraging brands like Andaz that have complimentary mini-bars instead? This is the USA, if I want a 40oz soda or to pay $8 for a Kit Kat bar, isn’t that my perogative?

  20. July 31st, 2013 at 7:09 am

    Peetyrd said,

    How about food at stadiums/sporting events? Probably more expensive and equally unhealthy.

  21. July 31st, 2013 at 7:57 am

    Patrick said,

    Banning mini-bars? Methinks not! Let’s not forget about Andaz’s free minibar bar (alcohol not included) and Kimpton’s InTouch program where guests can raid the minibar and receive a $10 credit ($15 credit in NYC) to use toward munchies and drinks.

  22. July 31st, 2013 at 9:05 am

    gobluetwo said,

    Darn you Patrick for stealing my exact thoughts I was about to post about Andaz and Kimpton! I love that Andaz does daily refreshes when you partake of your freebies, and without a minibar, what would I raid at Kimptons?

  23. August 12th, 2013 at 3:07 pm

    Chris Elliott calls loyalty programs a scam... again - One Mile at a Time - One Mile at a Time said,

    [...] onto the interwebs today. I was hoping he’d take a break from his usual ridiculousness after arguing a couple of weeks ago that minibars should be banned by law, not just because they’re overpriced, but because [...]

  24. Add A Comment

home top

One Mile at a Time is owned by PointsPros, Inc. Some links to credit cards and other products on this website will earn an affiliate commission, and this website has a financial relationship with several credit card issuing banks. All content unless otherwise noted or quoted is the author's own, and not provided or commissioned by any other entity. This site is for entertainment purpose only. The owner of this site is not an investment advisor, financial planner, nor legal or tax professional and articles here are of an opinion and general nature and should not be relied upon for individual circumstances.

Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by the credit card issuer. Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of the credit card issuer, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the credit card issuer. This site may be compensated through the credit card issuer Affiliate Program.